Cargando…

Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues

BACKGROUND: Animal skin and gut microbiomes are important components of host fitness. However, the processes that shape the microbiomes of wildlife are poorly understood, particularly with regard to exposure to environmental contaminants. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to quantify how exposure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lavrinienko, Anton, Tukalenko, Eugene, Mappes, Tapio, Watts, Phillip C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0595-0
_version_ 1783374484274675712
author Lavrinienko, Anton
Tukalenko, Eugene
Mappes, Tapio
Watts, Phillip C.
author_facet Lavrinienko, Anton
Tukalenko, Eugene
Mappes, Tapio
Watts, Phillip C.
author_sort Lavrinienko, Anton
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Animal skin and gut microbiomes are important components of host fitness. However, the processes that shape the microbiomes of wildlife are poorly understood, particularly with regard to exposure to environmental contaminants. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to quantify how exposure to radionuclides impacts the skin and gut microbiota of a small mammal, the bank vole Myodes glareolus, inhabiting areas within and outside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), Ukraine. RESULTS: Skin microbiomes of male bank voles were more diverse than females. However, the most pronounced differences in skin microbiomes occurred at a larger spatial scale, with higher alpha diversity in the skin microbiomes of bank voles from areas within the CEZ, whether contaminated by radionuclides or not, than in the skin microbiomes of animals from uncontaminated locations outside the CEZ, near Kyiv. Similarly, irrespective of the level of radionuclide contamination, skin microbiome communities (beta diversity) showed greater similarities within the CEZ, than to the areas near Kyiv. Hence, bank vole skin microbiome communities are structured more by geography than the level of soil radionuclides. This pattern presents a contrast with bank vole gut microbiota, where microbiomes could be strikingly similar among distant (~ 80 km of separation), uncontaminated locations, and where differences in microbiome community structure were associated with the level of radioactivity. We also found that the level of (dis)similarity between the skin and gut microbiome communities from the same individuals was contingent on the potential for exposure to radionuclides. CONCLUSIONS: Bank vole skin and gut microbiomes have distinct responses to similar environmental cues and thus are structured at different spatial scales. Our study shows how exposure to environmental pollution can affect the relationship between a mammalian host’s skin and gut microbial communities, potentially homogenising the microbiomes in habitats affected by pollution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0595-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6258405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62584052018-11-29 Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues Lavrinienko, Anton Tukalenko, Eugene Mappes, Tapio Watts, Phillip C. Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Animal skin and gut microbiomes are important components of host fitness. However, the processes that shape the microbiomes of wildlife are poorly understood, particularly with regard to exposure to environmental contaminants. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to quantify how exposure to radionuclides impacts the skin and gut microbiota of a small mammal, the bank vole Myodes glareolus, inhabiting areas within and outside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), Ukraine. RESULTS: Skin microbiomes of male bank voles were more diverse than females. However, the most pronounced differences in skin microbiomes occurred at a larger spatial scale, with higher alpha diversity in the skin microbiomes of bank voles from areas within the CEZ, whether contaminated by radionuclides or not, than in the skin microbiomes of animals from uncontaminated locations outside the CEZ, near Kyiv. Similarly, irrespective of the level of radionuclide contamination, skin microbiome communities (beta diversity) showed greater similarities within the CEZ, than to the areas near Kyiv. Hence, bank vole skin microbiome communities are structured more by geography than the level of soil radionuclides. This pattern presents a contrast with bank vole gut microbiota, where microbiomes could be strikingly similar among distant (~ 80 km of separation), uncontaminated locations, and where differences in microbiome community structure were associated with the level of radioactivity. We also found that the level of (dis)similarity between the skin and gut microbiome communities from the same individuals was contingent on the potential for exposure to radionuclides. CONCLUSIONS: Bank vole skin and gut microbiomes have distinct responses to similar environmental cues and thus are structured at different spatial scales. Our study shows how exposure to environmental pollution can affect the relationship between a mammalian host’s skin and gut microbial communities, potentially homogenising the microbiomes in habitats affected by pollution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-018-0595-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6258405/ /pubmed/30477569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0595-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lavrinienko, Anton
Tukalenko, Eugene
Mappes, Tapio
Watts, Phillip C.
Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title_full Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title_fullStr Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title_full_unstemmed Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title_short Skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
title_sort skin and gut microbiomes of a wild mammal respond to different environmental cues
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0595-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lavrinienkoanton skinandgutmicrobiomesofawildmammalrespondtodifferentenvironmentalcues
AT tukalenkoeugene skinandgutmicrobiomesofawildmammalrespondtodifferentenvironmentalcues
AT mappestapio skinandgutmicrobiomesofawildmammalrespondtodifferentenvironmentalcues
AT wattsphillipc skinandgutmicrobiomesofawildmammalrespondtodifferentenvironmentalcues