Cargando…
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study)
BACKGROUND: Lung dysfunction commonly occurs after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Randomized evidence suggests that the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) in major abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Appropriate lung recruitment and a correctly set po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3046-0 |
_version_ | 1783374486365536256 |
---|---|
author | Bignami, Elena Spadaro, Savino Saglietti, Francesco Di Lullo, Antonio Corte, Francesca Dalla Guarnieri, Marcello de Simone, Giulio Giambuzzi, Ilaria Zangrillo, Alberto Volta, Carlo Alberto |
author_facet | Bignami, Elena Spadaro, Savino Saglietti, Francesco Di Lullo, Antonio Corte, Francesca Dalla Guarnieri, Marcello de Simone, Giulio Giambuzzi, Ilaria Zangrillo, Alberto Volta, Carlo Alberto |
author_sort | Bignami, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lung dysfunction commonly occurs after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Randomized evidence suggests that the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) in major abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Appropriate lung recruitment and a correctly set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level may prevent EFL. According to the available data in the literature, an adequate ventilation strategy during cardiac surgery is not provided. The aim of this study is to assess whether a mechanical ventilation strategy based on optimal lung recruitment with a best PEEP before and after CPB and with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during CPB would reduce the incidence of respiratory complications after cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a single-center, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, high-risk adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either a best PEEP (calculated with a PEEP test) or zero PEEP before and after CPB and CPAP (equal to the best PEEP) or no ventilation (patient disconnected from the circuit) during CPB. The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint of the incidence of EFL after the weaning from CPB and postoperative pulmonary complications. DISCUSSION: This study will help to establish a correct ventilatory strategy before, after, and during CPB. The main purpose is to establish if a ventilation based on a simple and feasible respiratory test may preserve lung function in cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02633423. Registered on 6 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3046-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6258414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62584142018-11-29 Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) Bignami, Elena Spadaro, Savino Saglietti, Francesco Di Lullo, Antonio Corte, Francesca Dalla Guarnieri, Marcello de Simone, Giulio Giambuzzi, Ilaria Zangrillo, Alberto Volta, Carlo Alberto Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Lung dysfunction commonly occurs after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Randomized evidence suggests that the presence of expiratory flow limitation (EFL) in major abdominal surgery is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Appropriate lung recruitment and a correctly set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level may prevent EFL. According to the available data in the literature, an adequate ventilation strategy during cardiac surgery is not provided. The aim of this study is to assess whether a mechanical ventilation strategy based on optimal lung recruitment with a best PEEP before and after CPB and with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during CPB would reduce the incidence of respiratory complications after cardiac surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a single-center, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, high-risk adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either a best PEEP (calculated with a PEEP test) or zero PEEP before and after CPB and CPAP (equal to the best PEEP) or no ventilation (patient disconnected from the circuit) during CPB. The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint of the incidence of EFL after the weaning from CPB and postoperative pulmonary complications. DISCUSSION: This study will help to establish a correct ventilatory strategy before, after, and during CPB. The main purpose is to establish if a ventilation based on a simple and feasible respiratory test may preserve lung function in cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02633423. Registered on 6 December 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3046-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6258414/ /pubmed/30477541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3046-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bignami, Elena Spadaro, Savino Saglietti, Francesco Di Lullo, Antonio Corte, Francesca Dalla Guarnieri, Marcello de Simone, Giulio Giambuzzi, Ilaria Zangrillo, Alberto Volta, Carlo Alberto Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title_full | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title_fullStr | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title_short | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (EFLcore study) |
title_sort | positive end-expiratory pressure (peep) level to prevent expiratory flow limitation during cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (eflcore study) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3046-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bignamielena positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT spadarosavino positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT sagliettifrancesco positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT dilulloantonio positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT cortefrancescadalla positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT guarnierimarcello positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT desimonegiulio positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT giambuzziilaria positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT zangrilloalberto positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy AT voltacarloalberto positiveendexpiratorypressurepeepleveltopreventexpiratoryflowlimitationduringcardiacsurgerystudyprotocolforarandomizedclinicaltrialeflcorestudy |