Cargando…
Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting
BACKGROUND: Experience of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is associated with mental illness. Advocacy has little effect on mental health outcomes of female DVA survivors and there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this population. OBJECTIVE: To test effectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205485 |
_version_ | 1783374509534871552 |
---|---|
author | Ferrari, Giulia Feder, Gene Agnew-Davies, Roxane Bailey, Jayne E. Hollinghurst, Sandra Howard, Louise Howarth, Emma Sardinha, Lynnmarie Sharp, Debbie Peters, Tim J. |
author_facet | Ferrari, Giulia Feder, Gene Agnew-Davies, Roxane Bailey, Jayne E. Hollinghurst, Sandra Howard, Louise Howarth, Emma Sardinha, Lynnmarie Sharp, Debbie Peters, Tim J. |
author_sort | Ferrari, Giulia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Experience of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is associated with mental illness. Advocacy has little effect on mental health outcomes of female DVA survivors and there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this population. OBJECTIVE: To test effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered by advocates to DVA survivors. DESIGN, MASKING, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic parallel group individually randomized controlled trial of normal DVA advocacy vs. advocacy + psychological intervention. Statistician and researchers blinded to group assignment. Setting: specialist DVA agencies; two UK cities. Participants: Women aged 16 years and older accessing DVA services. INTERVENTION: Eight specialist psychological advocacy (SPA) sessions with two follow up sessions. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes at 12 months: depression symptoms (PHQ-9) and psychological distress (CORE-OM). Primary analysis: intention to treat linear (logistic) regression model for continuous (binary) outcomes. RESULTS: 263 women recruited (78 in shelter/refuge, 185 in community), 2 withdrew (1 community, control group; 1 intervention, refuge group), 1 was excluded from the study for protocol violation (community, control group), 130 in intervention and 130 in control groups. Recruitment ended June 2013. 12-month follow up: 64%. At 12-month follow up greater improvement in mental health of women in the intervention group. Difference in average CORE-OM score between intervention and control groups: -3.3 points (95% CI -5.5 to -1.2). Difference in average PHQ-9 score between intervention and control group: -2.2 (95% CI -4.1 to -0.3). At 12 months, 35% of the intervention group and 55% of the control group were above the CORE-OM -2clinical threshold (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.64); 29% of the intervention group and 46% of the control group were above the PHQ-9 clinical threshold (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81), LIMITATIONS: 64% retention at 12 months CONCLUSIONS: An eight-session psychological intervention delivered by DVA advocates produced clinically relevant improvement in mental health outcomes compared with normal advocacy care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN58561170 Original Research 3675/3750 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6258512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62585122018-12-06 Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting Ferrari, Giulia Feder, Gene Agnew-Davies, Roxane Bailey, Jayne E. Hollinghurst, Sandra Howard, Louise Howarth, Emma Sardinha, Lynnmarie Sharp, Debbie Peters, Tim J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Experience of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) is associated with mental illness. Advocacy has little effect on mental health outcomes of female DVA survivors and there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this population. OBJECTIVE: To test effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered by advocates to DVA survivors. DESIGN, MASKING, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic parallel group individually randomized controlled trial of normal DVA advocacy vs. advocacy + psychological intervention. Statistician and researchers blinded to group assignment. Setting: specialist DVA agencies; two UK cities. Participants: Women aged 16 years and older accessing DVA services. INTERVENTION: Eight specialist psychological advocacy (SPA) sessions with two follow up sessions. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes at 12 months: depression symptoms (PHQ-9) and psychological distress (CORE-OM). Primary analysis: intention to treat linear (logistic) regression model for continuous (binary) outcomes. RESULTS: 263 women recruited (78 in shelter/refuge, 185 in community), 2 withdrew (1 community, control group; 1 intervention, refuge group), 1 was excluded from the study for protocol violation (community, control group), 130 in intervention and 130 in control groups. Recruitment ended June 2013. 12-month follow up: 64%. At 12-month follow up greater improvement in mental health of women in the intervention group. Difference in average CORE-OM score between intervention and control groups: -3.3 points (95% CI -5.5 to -1.2). Difference in average PHQ-9 score between intervention and control group: -2.2 (95% CI -4.1 to -0.3). At 12 months, 35% of the intervention group and 55% of the control group were above the CORE-OM -2clinical threshold (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.64); 29% of the intervention group and 46% of the control group were above the PHQ-9 clinical threshold (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81), LIMITATIONS: 64% retention at 12 months CONCLUSIONS: An eight-session psychological intervention delivered by DVA advocates produced clinically relevant improvement in mental health outcomes compared with normal advocacy care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN58561170 Original Research 3675/3750 Public Library of Science 2018-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6258512/ /pubmed/30481183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205485 Text en © 2018 Ferrari et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferrari, Giulia Feder, Gene Agnew-Davies, Roxane Bailey, Jayne E. Hollinghurst, Sandra Howard, Louise Howarth, Emma Sardinha, Lynnmarie Sharp, Debbie Peters, Tim J. Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title | Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title_full | Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title_fullStr | Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title_short | Psychological advocacy towards healing (PATH): A randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
title_sort | psychological advocacy towards healing (path): a randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention in a domestic violence service setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrarigiulia psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT federgene psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT agnewdaviesroxane psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT baileyjaynee psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT hollinghurstsandra psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT howardlouise psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT howarthemma psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT sardinhalynnmarie psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT sharpdebbie psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting AT peterstimj psychologicaladvocacytowardshealingpatharandomizedcontrolledtrialofapsychologicalinterventioninadomesticviolenceservicesetting |