Cargando…
Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247 |
_version_ | 1783374665926836224 |
---|---|
author | Gavrić Lovrec, Vida Cokan, Andrej Lukman, Lara Arko, Darja Takač, Iztok |
author_facet | Gavrić Lovrec, Vida Cokan, Andrej Lukman, Lara Arko, Darja Takač, Iztok |
author_sort | Gavrić Lovrec, Vida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6259383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62593832018-11-30 Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review Gavrić Lovrec, Vida Cokan, Andrej Lukman, Lara Arko, Darja Takač, Iztok J Int Med Res Case Reports Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs. SAGE Publications 2018-09-17 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6259383/ /pubmed/30222013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Case Reports Gavrić Lovrec, Vida Cokan, Andrej Lukman, Lara Arko, Darja Takač, Iztok Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title | Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title_full | Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title_fullStr | Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title_short | Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
title_sort | retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review |
topic | Case Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gavriclovrecvida retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview AT cokanandrej retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview AT lukmanlara retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview AT arkodarja retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview AT takaciztok retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview |