Cargando…

Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review

Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavrić Lovrec, Vida, Cokan, Andrej, Lukman, Lara, Arko, Darja, Takač, Iztok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247
_version_ 1783374665926836224
author Gavrić Lovrec, Vida
Cokan, Andrej
Lukman, Lara
Arko, Darja
Takač, Iztok
author_facet Gavrić Lovrec, Vida
Cokan, Andrej
Lukman, Lara
Arko, Darja
Takač, Iztok
author_sort Gavrić Lovrec, Vida
collection PubMed
description Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6259383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62593832018-11-30 Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review Gavrić Lovrec, Vida Cokan, Andrej Lukman, Lara Arko, Darja Takač, Iztok J Int Med Res Case Reports Although the incidence of retained surgical items (RSIs) is low, it is nevertheless an important preventable cause of patient injury that can ultimately lead to the patient's death and to subsequent high medical and legal costs. Unintentional RSI is the cause of 70% of re-interventions, with a morbidity of 80% and mortality of 35%. The most common RSIs are sponges or gauze (gossypiboma or textiloma), while retained surgical instruments and needles are rare. Perioperative counting of equipment and materials is the most common method of screening for RSIs, while a diagnosis can later be confirmed by the clinical appearance and by imaging studies. We present a rare case of a 43-year-old patient who was admitted to our hospital because of two retained needles following a cesarean section, despite several subsequent laparotomies. One needle had been removed previously, but in addition to the remaining needle, we also removed a retained gauze. The diagnosis of RSIs is extremely important, and safe surgical practices including the addition of new imaging technologies should be encouraged to detect RSIs. SAGE Publications 2018-09-17 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6259383/ /pubmed/30222013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Case Reports
Gavrić Lovrec, Vida
Cokan, Andrej
Lukman, Lara
Arko, Darja
Takač, Iztok
Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title_full Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title_fullStr Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title_short Retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
title_sort retained surgical needle and gauze after cesarean section and adnexectomy: a case report and literature review
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518788247
work_keys_str_mv AT gavriclovrecvida retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview
AT cokanandrej retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview
AT lukmanlara retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview
AT arkodarja retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview
AT takaciztok retainedsurgicalneedleandgauzeaftercesareansectionandadnexectomyacasereportandliteraturereview