Cargando…

Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, the new NHS contract for primary care mandates that practices use the Electronic Frailty Index (EFI) to screen for frailty and apply clinical judgment, based on knowledge of the patient, to decide whether they have a diagnosis of frailty. EFI has not yet been valid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attwood, David, Stevens, Kara, Jones, Lindsay, Harris, Lucinda, Roberts, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598948
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_18
_version_ 1783374703018115072
author Attwood, David
Stevens, Kara
Jones, Lindsay
Harris, Lucinda
Roberts, Fiona
author_facet Attwood, David
Stevens, Kara
Jones, Lindsay
Harris, Lucinda
Roberts, Fiona
author_sort Attwood, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, the new NHS contract for primary care mandates that practices use the Electronic Frailty Index (EFI) to screen for frailty and apply clinical judgment, based on knowledge of the patient, to decide whether they have a diagnosis of frailty. EFI has not yet been validated for this purpose. Many primary care clinicians would agree that although not formally investigated, there seems to be a strong association between being housebound or in institutional care and having a diagnosis of frailty. Although being housebound or in institutional care is not commonly coded in primary care computer record systems (IT), this cohort of patients do require home visits if they become unwell. Home visits are coded and it is simple to run a search on primary care IT to generate a list of older people who have received a home over given period. AIM: This study assessed whether being housebound and requiring home visits could form a new screening tool for frailty. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study from 1/3/15 to 29/2/16. Primary care, South Devon. METHOD: Medical records of 154 patients over 65 years of age were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: a group (n = 82) that had received a home visit and a second group consisting of a randomized sample of patients (n = 72) with similar baseline characteristics who had not. Patient records were analyzed by two clinicians to determine whether a frailty syndrome was present. Researchers were blinded to each other's results. An arbitrator determined the frailty status on disagreement. RESULTS: Home visits have a sensitivity of 87.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 74.35%–95.17%] and specificity of 61.68% (95% CI: 51.78%–70.92%). For frailty, Cohen's Kappa showed fair interobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that home visits are a good screen for frailty; the data are easy to retrieve from primary care IT and could be used as a valid screening tool to assist with identifying frailty in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6259543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62595432018-12-31 Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study Attwood, David Stevens, Kara Jones, Lindsay Harris, Lucinda Roberts, Fiona J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, the new NHS contract for primary care mandates that practices use the Electronic Frailty Index (EFI) to screen for frailty and apply clinical judgment, based on knowledge of the patient, to decide whether they have a diagnosis of frailty. EFI has not yet been validated for this purpose. Many primary care clinicians would agree that although not formally investigated, there seems to be a strong association between being housebound or in institutional care and having a diagnosis of frailty. Although being housebound or in institutional care is not commonly coded in primary care computer record systems (IT), this cohort of patients do require home visits if they become unwell. Home visits are coded and it is simple to run a search on primary care IT to generate a list of older people who have received a home over given period. AIM: This study assessed whether being housebound and requiring home visits could form a new screening tool for frailty. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study from 1/3/15 to 29/2/16. Primary care, South Devon. METHOD: Medical records of 154 patients over 65 years of age were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: a group (n = 82) that had received a home visit and a second group consisting of a randomized sample of patients (n = 72) with similar baseline characteristics who had not. Patient records were analyzed by two clinicians to determine whether a frailty syndrome was present. Researchers were blinded to each other's results. An arbitrator determined the frailty status on disagreement. RESULTS: Home visits have a sensitivity of 87.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 74.35%–95.17%] and specificity of 61.68% (95% CI: 51.78%–70.92%). For frailty, Cohen's Kappa showed fair interobserver reliability. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that home visits are a good screen for frailty; the data are easy to retrieve from primary care IT and could be used as a valid screening tool to assist with identifying frailty in primary care. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6259543/ /pubmed/30598948 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Attwood, David
Stevens, Kara
Jones, Lindsay
Harris, Lucinda
Roberts, Fiona
Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title_full Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title_fullStr Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title_short Home visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study
title_sort home visits: a new screening tool for frailty? a retrospective exploratory study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598948
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_18
work_keys_str_mv AT attwooddavid homevisitsanewscreeningtoolforfrailtyaretrospectiveexploratorystudy
AT stevenskara homevisitsanewscreeningtoolforfrailtyaretrospectiveexploratorystudy
AT joneslindsay homevisitsanewscreeningtoolforfrailtyaretrospectiveexploratorystudy
AT harrislucinda homevisitsanewscreeningtoolforfrailtyaretrospectiveexploratorystudy
AT robertsfiona homevisitsanewscreeningtoolforfrailtyaretrospectiveexploratorystudy