Cargando…
A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233 |
_version_ | 1783374749276045312 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Tongxin Sun, Quanquan Chen, Jing Wang, Fangzheng Li, Bin Qin, Weifeng Ye, Zhimin Hu, Fujun |
author_facet | Liu, Tongxin Sun, Quanquan Chen, Jing Wang, Fangzheng Li, Bin Qin, Weifeng Ye, Zhimin Hu, Fujun |
author_sort | Liu, Tongxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in our hospital who received NACT with GEM or docetaxel plus CDDP combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients treated with GEM plus CDDP (GP) combined with CCRT were matched with 52 patients who received docetaxel plus CDDP (TP) combined with CCRT. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range, 14–72 months), the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 78.8%, 66.0%, 81.0% and 75.9%, respectively, in the GP group and 79.4%, 60.5%, 79.6% and 73.6%, respectively, in the TP group. No statistically significant survival differences were found between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, T3–4 and N2–3 were prognostic factors for poor 5-year PFS and DMFS (all P-values <0.05). Patients in the TP group experienced less grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia but more grade 3–4 leucopenia and neutropenia than those in the GP group (all P-values <0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other toxicities (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSION: NACT with GP or TP regimen achieved comparable clinical outcome with acceptable toxicities. Both regimens might be a treatment option for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6260124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62601242018-12-11 A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis Liu, Tongxin Sun, Quanquan Chen, Jing Wang, Fangzheng Li, Bin Qin, Weifeng Ye, Zhimin Hu, Fujun Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in our hospital who received NACT with GEM or docetaxel plus CDDP combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients treated with GEM plus CDDP (GP) combined with CCRT were matched with 52 patients who received docetaxel plus CDDP (TP) combined with CCRT. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range, 14–72 months), the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 78.8%, 66.0%, 81.0% and 75.9%, respectively, in the GP group and 79.4%, 60.5%, 79.6% and 73.6%, respectively, in the TP group. No statistically significant survival differences were found between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, T3–4 and N2–3 were prognostic factors for poor 5-year PFS and DMFS (all P-values <0.05). Patients in the TP group experienced less grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia but more grade 3–4 leucopenia and neutropenia than those in the GP group (all P-values <0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other toxicities (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSION: NACT with GP or TP regimen achieved comparable clinical outcome with acceptable toxicities. Both regimens might be a treatment option for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6260124/ /pubmed/30538570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233 Text en © 2018 Liu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Liu, Tongxin Sun, Quanquan Chen, Jing Wang, Fangzheng Li, Bin Qin, Weifeng Ye, Zhimin Hu, Fujun A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title | A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title_full | A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title_short | A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
title_sort | comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liutongxin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT sunquanquan acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT chenjing acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT wangfangzheng acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT libin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT qinweifeng acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yezhimin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT hufujun acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT liutongxin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT sunquanquan comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT chenjing comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT wangfangzheng comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT libin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT qinweifeng comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yezhimin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT hufujun comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis |