Cargando…

A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Tongxin, Sun, Quanquan, Chen, Jing, Wang, Fangzheng, Li, Bin, Qin, Weifeng, Ye, Zhimin, Hu, Fujun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538570
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233
_version_ 1783374749276045312
author Liu, Tongxin
Sun, Quanquan
Chen, Jing
Wang, Fangzheng
Li, Bin
Qin, Weifeng
Ye, Zhimin
Hu, Fujun
author_facet Liu, Tongxin
Sun, Quanquan
Chen, Jing
Wang, Fangzheng
Li, Bin
Qin, Weifeng
Ye, Zhimin
Hu, Fujun
author_sort Liu, Tongxin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in our hospital who received NACT with GEM or docetaxel plus CDDP combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients treated with GEM plus CDDP (GP) combined with CCRT were matched with 52 patients who received docetaxel plus CDDP (TP) combined with CCRT. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range, 14–72 months), the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 78.8%, 66.0%, 81.0% and 75.9%, respectively, in the GP group and 79.4%, 60.5%, 79.6% and 73.6%, respectively, in the TP group. No statistically significant survival differences were found between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, T3–4 and N2–3 were prognostic factors for poor 5-year PFS and DMFS (all P-values <0.05). Patients in the TP group experienced less grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia but more grade 3–4 leucopenia and neutropenia than those in the GP group (all P-values <0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other toxicities (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSION: NACT with GP or TP regimen achieved comparable clinical outcome with acceptable toxicities. Both regimens might be a treatment option for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62601242018-12-11 A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis Liu, Tongxin Sun, Quanquan Chen, Jing Wang, Fangzheng Li, Bin Qin, Weifeng Ye, Zhimin Hu, Fujun Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with gemcitabine (GEM) vs docetaxel plus cisplatin (CDDP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 222 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC between February 2012 and May 2014 in our hospital who received NACT with GEM or docetaxel plus CDDP combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-two patients treated with GEM plus CDDP (GP) combined with CCRT were matched with 52 patients who received docetaxel plus CDDP (TP) combined with CCRT. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 60 months (range, 14–72 months), the 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), local relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 78.8%, 66.0%, 81.0% and 75.9%, respectively, in the GP group and 79.4%, 60.5%, 79.6% and 73.6%, respectively, in the TP group. No statistically significant survival differences were found between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, T3–4 and N2–3 were prognostic factors for poor 5-year PFS and DMFS (all P-values <0.05). Patients in the TP group experienced less grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia but more grade 3–4 leucopenia and neutropenia than those in the GP group (all P-values <0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in other toxicities (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSION: NACT with GP or TP regimen achieved comparable clinical outcome with acceptable toxicities. Both regimens might be a treatment option for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6260124/ /pubmed/30538570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233 Text en © 2018 Liu et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Tongxin
Sun, Quanquan
Chen, Jing
Wang, Fangzheng
Li, Bin
Qin, Weifeng
Ye, Zhimin
Hu, Fujun
A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_short A comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_sort comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538570
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S186233
work_keys_str_mv AT liutongxin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sunquanquan acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenjing acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wangfangzheng acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT libin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT qinweifeng acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yezhimin acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT hufujun acomparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liutongxin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sunquanquan comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenjing comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wangfangzheng comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT libin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT qinweifeng comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yezhimin comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT hufujun comparisonofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithgemcitabineversusdocetaxelpluscisplatininlocoregionallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis