Cargando…

A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)

OBJECTIVE: Up to 87% of uterine leiomyosarcomas have estrogen receptor positivity. There are no effective adjuvant therapies for LMS. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of letrozole in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The primary endpoint of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slomovitz, Brian M., Taub, Michael C., Huang, Marilyn, Levenback, Charles, Coleman, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.11.001
_version_ 1783374781192601600
author Slomovitz, Brian M.
Taub, Michael C.
Huang, Marilyn
Levenback, Charles
Coleman, Robert L.
author_facet Slomovitz, Brian M.
Taub, Michael C.
Huang, Marilyn
Levenback, Charles
Coleman, Robert L.
author_sort Slomovitz, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Up to 87% of uterine leiomyosarcomas have estrogen receptor positivity. There are no effective adjuvant therapies for LMS. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of letrozole in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The primary endpoint of this study was a reduction in the recurrence rate for patients with this disease. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, phase II study of letrozole (experimental arm) administered orally on a daily basis vs. observation (control) in patients with newly diagnosed early stage uLMS. Patient enrollment was to be open to any individual with newly diagnosed uLMS seen in the Gynecologic Oncology Center at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Hormone receptor positivity using CLIA approved lab testing was an eligibility requirement. No prior therapy was allowed. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomized. Four patients were in the experimental arm and five patients were in the observation arm. No patients had prior therapy. The median duration of protocol treatment was 43.9 months (range, 6.5–70.2). The median PFS for the experimental arm was not reached (NR) compared to 17.3 months. The percent progression free at 12 and 24 months was 100% for patients receiving letrozole compared to 80% at 12 months and 40% at 24 months for patients in the observation arm. CONCLUSIONS: While no definitive conclusions can be made due to early study closure, these early observations warrant further investigation. We desperately need an effective adjuvant therapy for women with early stage uLMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62603882018-12-05 A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) Slomovitz, Brian M. Taub, Michael C. Huang, Marilyn Levenback, Charles Coleman, Robert L. Gynecol Oncol Rep Case Series OBJECTIVE: Up to 87% of uterine leiomyosarcomas have estrogen receptor positivity. There are no effective adjuvant therapies for LMS. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of letrozole in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). The primary endpoint of this study was a reduction in the recurrence rate for patients with this disease. METHODS: We performed a randomized, open-label, phase II study of letrozole (experimental arm) administered orally on a daily basis vs. observation (control) in patients with newly diagnosed early stage uLMS. Patient enrollment was to be open to any individual with newly diagnosed uLMS seen in the Gynecologic Oncology Center at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Hormone receptor positivity using CLIA approved lab testing was an eligibility requirement. No prior therapy was allowed. RESULTS: Nine patients were randomized. Four patients were in the experimental arm and five patients were in the observation arm. No patients had prior therapy. The median duration of protocol treatment was 43.9 months (range, 6.5–70.2). The median PFS for the experimental arm was not reached (NR) compared to 17.3 months. The percent progression free at 12 and 24 months was 100% for patients receiving letrozole compared to 80% at 12 months and 40% at 24 months for patients in the observation arm. CONCLUSIONS: While no definitive conclusions can be made due to early study closure, these early observations warrant further investigation. We desperately need an effective adjuvant therapy for women with early stage uLMS. Elsevier 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6260388/ /pubmed/30519622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.11.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Slomovitz, Brian M.
Taub, Michael C.
Huang, Marilyn
Levenback, Charles
Coleman, Robert L.
A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title_full A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title_fullStr A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title_full_unstemmed A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title_short A randomized phase II study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS)
title_sort randomized phase ii study of letrozole vs. observation in patients with newly diagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma (ulms)
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT slomovitzbrianm arandomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT taubmichaelc arandomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT huangmarilyn arandomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT levenbackcharles arandomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT colemanrobertl arandomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT slomovitzbrianm randomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT taubmichaelc randomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT huangmarilyn randomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT levenbackcharles randomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms
AT colemanrobertl randomizedphaseiistudyofletrozolevsobservationinpatientswithnewlydiagnoseduterineleiomyosarcomaulms