Cargando…

Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To improve quality of life (QOL) in patients at risk for post–intensive care syndrome (PICS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method, prospective, observational, pre-post interventional study in an adult medical and mixed medical/surgical/transplant intensive care unit (ICU) at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniels, Lisa M., Johnson, Andrea B., Cornelius, Patrick J., Bowron, Catherine, Lehnertz, Andrea, Moore, Mitch, Shen, YongChun, Schulte, Philip J., Pendegraft, Richard S., Hall, Kristin R., Bauer, Philippe R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.10.001
_version_ 1783374806101524480
author Daniels, Lisa M.
Johnson, Andrea B.
Cornelius, Patrick J.
Bowron, Catherine
Lehnertz, Andrea
Moore, Mitch
Shen, YongChun
Schulte, Philip J.
Pendegraft, Richard S.
Hall, Kristin R.
Bauer, Philippe R.
author_facet Daniels, Lisa M.
Johnson, Andrea B.
Cornelius, Patrick J.
Bowron, Catherine
Lehnertz, Andrea
Moore, Mitch
Shen, YongChun
Schulte, Philip J.
Pendegraft, Richard S.
Hall, Kristin R.
Bauer, Philippe R.
author_sort Daniels, Lisa M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To improve quality of life (QOL) in patients at risk for post–intensive care syndrome (PICS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method, prospective, observational, pre-post interventional study in an adult medical and mixed medical/surgical/transplant intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic hospital. Preintervention included patients admitted from October 1 through October 31, 2016, and postintervention included patients admitted from January 15 through February 14, 2017. First, a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders identified barriers associated with decreased QOL in patients at risk for PICS. Next, interventions were designed and implemented. The effect of interventions was assessed using a mixed-method analysis. The qualitative analysis used a modified grounded theory approach. The quantitative analysis included assessment of preexisting symptoms and risk factors associated with PICS. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36), which surveys physical and mental composite scores, was used to assess QOL. RESULTS: Barriers identified were lack of awareness and understanding of PICS. Interventions included educational videos, paper and online education and treatment materials, and online and in-person support groups for education and treatment. After interventions, the qualitative analysis found that patients who participated in the interventions after hospital discharge showed improved QOL, whereas education during hospitalization alone was not effective. The quantitative analysis did not find improvement in QOL, as defined by SF-36 physical or mental composite scores. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeted to patients after hospitalization may offer subjective improvement in QOL for those at risk for PICS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62604972018-12-17 Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome Daniels, Lisa M. Johnson, Andrea B. Cornelius, Patrick J. Bowron, Catherine Lehnertz, Andrea Moore, Mitch Shen, YongChun Schulte, Philip J. Pendegraft, Richard S. Hall, Kristin R. Bauer, Philippe R. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To improve quality of life (QOL) in patients at risk for post–intensive care syndrome (PICS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method, prospective, observational, pre-post interventional study in an adult medical and mixed medical/surgical/transplant intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic hospital. Preintervention included patients admitted from October 1 through October 31, 2016, and postintervention included patients admitted from January 15 through February 14, 2017. First, a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders identified barriers associated with decreased QOL in patients at risk for PICS. Next, interventions were designed and implemented. The effect of interventions was assessed using a mixed-method analysis. The qualitative analysis used a modified grounded theory approach. The quantitative analysis included assessment of preexisting symptoms and risk factors associated with PICS. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36), which surveys physical and mental composite scores, was used to assess QOL. RESULTS: Barriers identified were lack of awareness and understanding of PICS. Interventions included educational videos, paper and online education and treatment materials, and online and in-person support groups for education and treatment. After interventions, the qualitative analysis found that patients who participated in the interventions after hospital discharge showed improved QOL, whereas education during hospitalization alone was not effective. The quantitative analysis did not find improvement in QOL, as defined by SF-36 physical or mental composite scores. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeted to patients after hospitalization may offer subjective improvement in QOL for those at risk for PICS. Elsevier 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6260497/ /pubmed/30560238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.10.001 Text en © 2018 THE AUTHORS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Daniels, Lisa M.
Johnson, Andrea B.
Cornelius, Patrick J.
Bowron, Catherine
Lehnertz, Andrea
Moore, Mitch
Shen, YongChun
Schulte, Philip J.
Pendegraft, Richard S.
Hall, Kristin R.
Bauer, Philippe R.
Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title_full Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title_fullStr Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title_short Improving Quality of Life in Patients at Risk for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome
title_sort improving quality of life in patients at risk for post–intensive care syndrome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT danielslisam improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT johnsonandreab improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT corneliuspatrickj improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT bowroncatherine improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT lehnertzandrea improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT mooremitch improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT shenyongchun improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT schultephilipj improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT pendegraftrichards improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT hallkristinr improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome
AT bauerphilipper improvingqualityoflifeinpatientsatriskforpostintensivecaresyndrome