Cargando…

Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Successfully transitioning patients from hospital to home is a complex, often uncertain task. Despite significant efforts to improve the effectiveness of care transitions, they remain a challenge across health care systems. The lens of complex adaptive systems (CAS) provides a theoretica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penney, Lauren S., Nahid, Musarrat, Leykum, Luci K., Lanham, Holly Jordan, Noël, Polly H., Finley, Erin P., Pugh, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7
_version_ 1783374823159758848
author Penney, Lauren S.
Nahid, Musarrat
Leykum, Luci K.
Lanham, Holly Jordan
Noël, Polly H.
Finley, Erin P.
Pugh, Jacqueline
author_facet Penney, Lauren S.
Nahid, Musarrat
Leykum, Luci K.
Lanham, Holly Jordan
Noël, Polly H.
Finley, Erin P.
Pugh, Jacqueline
author_sort Penney, Lauren S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successfully transitioning patients from hospital to home is a complex, often uncertain task. Despite significant efforts to improve the effectiveness of care transitions, they remain a challenge across health care systems. The lens of complex adaptive systems (CAS) provides a theoretical approach for studying care transition interventions, with potential implications for intervention effectiveness. The aim of this study is to examine whether care transition interventions that are congruent with the complexity of the processes and conditions they are trying to improve will have better outcomes. METHODS: We identified a convenience sample of high-quality care transition intervention studies included in a care transition synthesis report by Kansagara and colleagues. After excluding studies that did not meet our criteria, we scored each study based on (1) the presence or absence of 5 CAS characteristics (learning, interconnections, self-organization, co-evolution, and emergence), as well as system-level interdependencies (resources and processes) in the intervention design, and (2) scored study readmission-related outcomes for effectiveness. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 154 reviewed articles met our inclusion criteria; these studies reported on 46 interventions. Nearly all the interventions involved a change in interconnections between people compared with care as usual (96% of interventions), and added resources (98%) and processes (98%). Most contained elements impacting learning (67%) and self-organization (69%). No intervention reflected either co-evolution or emergence. Almost 40% of interventions were rated as effective in terms of impact on hospital readmissions. Chi square testing for an association between outcomes and CAS characteristics was not significant for learning or self-organization, however interventions rated as effective were significantly more likely to have both of these characteristics (78%) than interventions rated as having no effect (32%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with components that influenced learning and self-organization were associated with a significant improvement in hospital readmissions-related outcomes. Learning alone might be necessary but not be sufficient for improving transitions. However, building self-organization into the intervention might help people effectively respond to problems and adapt in uncertain situations to reduce the likelihood of readmission. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62605702018-11-30 Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review Penney, Lauren S. Nahid, Musarrat Leykum, Luci K. Lanham, Holly Jordan Noël, Polly H. Finley, Erin P. Pugh, Jacqueline BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Successfully transitioning patients from hospital to home is a complex, often uncertain task. Despite significant efforts to improve the effectiveness of care transitions, they remain a challenge across health care systems. The lens of complex adaptive systems (CAS) provides a theoretical approach for studying care transition interventions, with potential implications for intervention effectiveness. The aim of this study is to examine whether care transition interventions that are congruent with the complexity of the processes and conditions they are trying to improve will have better outcomes. METHODS: We identified a convenience sample of high-quality care transition intervention studies included in a care transition synthesis report by Kansagara and colleagues. After excluding studies that did not meet our criteria, we scored each study based on (1) the presence or absence of 5 CAS characteristics (learning, interconnections, self-organization, co-evolution, and emergence), as well as system-level interdependencies (resources and processes) in the intervention design, and (2) scored study readmission-related outcomes for effectiveness. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 154 reviewed articles met our inclusion criteria; these studies reported on 46 interventions. Nearly all the interventions involved a change in interconnections between people compared with care as usual (96% of interventions), and added resources (98%) and processes (98%). Most contained elements impacting learning (67%) and self-organization (69%). No intervention reflected either co-evolution or emergence. Almost 40% of interventions were rated as effective in terms of impact on hospital readmissions. Chi square testing for an association between outcomes and CAS characteristics was not significant for learning or self-organization, however interventions rated as effective were significantly more likely to have both of these characteristics (78%) than interventions rated as having no effect (32%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with components that influenced learning and self-organization were associated with a significant improvement in hospital readmissions-related outcomes. Learning alone might be necessary but not be sufficient for improving transitions. However, building self-organization into the intervention might help people effectively respond to problems and adapt in uncertain situations to reduce the likelihood of readmission. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6260570/ /pubmed/30477576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Penney, Lauren S.
Nahid, Musarrat
Leykum, Luci K.
Lanham, Holly Jordan
Noël, Polly H.
Finley, Erin P.
Pugh, Jacqueline
Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title_full Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title_short Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review
title_sort interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7
work_keys_str_mv AT penneylaurens interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT nahidmusarrat interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT leykumlucik interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT lanhamhollyjordan interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT noelpollyh interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT finleyerinp interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview
AT pughjacqueline interventionstoreducereadmissionscancomplexadaptivesystemtheoryexplaintheheterogeneityineffectivenessasystematicreview