Cargando…

Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío, Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia, Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x
_version_ 1783374881306443776
author Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío
Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia
Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel
author_facet Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío
Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia
Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel
author_sort Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies in physical therapy (PT) students to assess the quality of their performance in a professional context. METHODS: A descriptive study was designed. The Measurement Tool for Clinical Competencies in PT (MTCCP) was developed based on the evaluation of 39 experts: 15 clinicians and 24 instructors. The content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Three professors were invited to apply the tool to 10 students. Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the reliability and validity of the scale. RESULTS: The CVI was positive—higher than 0.8. Principal component analysis confirmed the construct validity of the tool for two main factors: clinical reasoning (first factor) and professional behavior (second factor). With regard to reliability, the MTCCP achieved an internal congruence of 0.982. The inter-evaluator reproducibility for clinical reasoning, professional behavior, and the total MTCCP score was almost perfect; the ICCs were 0.984, 0.930, and 0.983, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MTCCP is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the performance of PT students in hospital settings and can be used to determine what skills students feel less confident using and what additional training/learning opportunities could be provided. Further research is needed to determine whether the MTCCP has similar validity and reproducibility in other Spanish-speaking national and international PT programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6260878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62608782018-12-10 Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies in physical therapy (PT) students to assess the quality of their performance in a professional context. METHODS: A descriptive study was designed. The Measurement Tool for Clinical Competencies in PT (MTCCP) was developed based on the evaluation of 39 experts: 15 clinicians and 24 instructors. The content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Three professors were invited to apply the tool to 10 students. Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the reliability and validity of the scale. RESULTS: The CVI was positive—higher than 0.8. Principal component analysis confirmed the construct validity of the tool for two main factors: clinical reasoning (first factor) and professional behavior (second factor). With regard to reliability, the MTCCP achieved an internal congruence of 0.982. The inter-evaluator reproducibility for clinical reasoning, professional behavior, and the total MTCCP score was almost perfect; the ICCs were 0.984, 0.930, and 0.983, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MTCCP is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the performance of PT students in hospital settings and can be used to determine what skills students feel less confident using and what additional training/learning opportunities could be provided. Further research is needed to determine whether the MTCCP has similar validity and reproducibility in other Spanish-speaking national and international PT programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6260878/ /pubmed/30470221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío
Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia
Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel
Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title_full Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title_fullStr Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title_short Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
title_sort validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x
work_keys_str_mv AT torresnarvaezmartharocio validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents
AT vargaspinillaolgacecilia validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents
AT rodriguezgrandeelianaisabel validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents