Cargando…
Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x |
_version_ | 1783374881306443776 |
---|---|
author | Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel |
author_facet | Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel |
author_sort | Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies in physical therapy (PT) students to assess the quality of their performance in a professional context. METHODS: A descriptive study was designed. The Measurement Tool for Clinical Competencies in PT (MTCCP) was developed based on the evaluation of 39 experts: 15 clinicians and 24 instructors. The content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Three professors were invited to apply the tool to 10 students. Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the reliability and validity of the scale. RESULTS: The CVI was positive—higher than 0.8. Principal component analysis confirmed the construct validity of the tool for two main factors: clinical reasoning (first factor) and professional behavior (second factor). With regard to reliability, the MTCCP achieved an internal congruence of 0.982. The inter-evaluator reproducibility for clinical reasoning, professional behavior, and the total MTCCP score was almost perfect; the ICCs were 0.984, 0.930, and 0.983, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MTCCP is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the performance of PT students in hospital settings and can be used to determine what skills students feel less confident using and what additional training/learning opportunities could be provided. Further research is needed to determine whether the MTCCP has similar validity and reproducibility in other Spanish-speaking national and international PT programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6260878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62608782018-12-10 Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The evaluation of competencies in the clinical field is essential for health professionals, as it allows the acquisition of these competencies to be tracked. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the validity and reliability of a tool for measuring clinical competencies in physical therapy (PT) students to assess the quality of their performance in a professional context. METHODS: A descriptive study was designed. The Measurement Tool for Clinical Competencies in PT (MTCCP) was developed based on the evaluation of 39 experts: 15 clinicians and 24 instructors. The content validity was evaluated using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Three professors were invited to apply the tool to 10 students. Cronbach’s alpha, exploratory factor analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient were used to determine the reliability and validity of the scale. RESULTS: The CVI was positive—higher than 0.8. Principal component analysis confirmed the construct validity of the tool for two main factors: clinical reasoning (first factor) and professional behavior (second factor). With regard to reliability, the MTCCP achieved an internal congruence of 0.982. The inter-evaluator reproducibility for clinical reasoning, professional behavior, and the total MTCCP score was almost perfect; the ICCs were 0.984, 0.930, and 0.983, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The MTCCP is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the performance of PT students in hospital settings and can be used to determine what skills students feel less confident using and what additional training/learning opportunities could be provided. Further research is needed to determine whether the MTCCP has similar validity and reproducibility in other Spanish-speaking national and international PT programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6260878/ /pubmed/30470221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Torres-Narváez, Martha-Rocío Vargas-Pinilla, Olga-Cecilia Rodríguez-Grande, Eliana-Isabel Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title | Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title_full | Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title_fullStr | Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title_short | Validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
title_sort | validity and reproducibility of a tool for assessing clinical competencies in physical therapy students |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1377-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torresnarvaezmartharocio validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents AT vargaspinillaolgacecilia validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents AT rodriguezgrandeelianaisabel validityandreproducibilityofatoolforassessingclinicalcompetenciesinphysicaltherapystudents |