Cargando…
Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036 |
_version_ | 1783374980264755200 |
---|---|
author | Buti, María Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel Casado, Miguel Ángel Sabater, Eliazar Esteban, Rafael |
author_facet | Buti, María Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel Casado, Miguel Ángel Sabater, Eliazar Esteban, Rafael |
author_sort | Buti, María |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental cost-utility ratio, ICUR) of 3 HCV screening strategies: a) general population of adults, b) high-risk groups, and c) population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. METHODS: An analytical decision model, projecting progression of the disease over a lifetime, was used to establish the candidate population for HCV screening. HCV data were obtained from the literature: anti-HCV prevalence (0.56%-1.54%), viremic patients (31.5%), and percentage of undiagnosed persons among those with viremia (35%). It was assumed that most patients would be treated and have HCV therapy response (98% SVR); transition probabilities, utilities, and disease management annual costs were obtained from the literature. Efficiency over the life of patients under the National Health System perspective was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total cost (screening, diagnosis, pharmacological and disease management). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. RESULTS: Screening of the adult population would identify a larger number of additional chronic hepatitis C cases (N = 52,694) than screening the highest anti-HCV prevalence population plus high-risk groups (N = 42,027) or screening high-risk groups (N = 26,128). ICUR for the general population vs. high-risk groups was €8914/QALY gained per patient (€18,157 incremental cost and 2.037 QALY). ICUR for the general population vs. population with highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups was €7,448/QALY gained per patient (€7,733 incremental cost and 1.038 QALY). These ICUR values are below the accepted efficiency threshold (€22,000-€30,000). CONCLUSION: HCV screening and treatment of the general adult population is cost-effective compared to screening of high-risk groups or the population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6261617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62616172018-12-19 Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain Buti, María Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel Casado, Miguel Ángel Sabater, Eliazar Esteban, Rafael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental cost-utility ratio, ICUR) of 3 HCV screening strategies: a) general population of adults, b) high-risk groups, and c) population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. METHODS: An analytical decision model, projecting progression of the disease over a lifetime, was used to establish the candidate population for HCV screening. HCV data were obtained from the literature: anti-HCV prevalence (0.56%-1.54%), viremic patients (31.5%), and percentage of undiagnosed persons among those with viremia (35%). It was assumed that most patients would be treated and have HCV therapy response (98% SVR); transition probabilities, utilities, and disease management annual costs were obtained from the literature. Efficiency over the life of patients under the National Health System perspective was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total cost (screening, diagnosis, pharmacological and disease management). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. RESULTS: Screening of the adult population would identify a larger number of additional chronic hepatitis C cases (N = 52,694) than screening the highest anti-HCV prevalence population plus high-risk groups (N = 42,027) or screening high-risk groups (N = 26,128). ICUR for the general population vs. high-risk groups was €8914/QALY gained per patient (€18,157 incremental cost and 2.037 QALY). ICUR for the general population vs. population with highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups was €7,448/QALY gained per patient (€7,733 incremental cost and 1.038 QALY). These ICUR values are below the accepted efficiency threshold (€22,000-€30,000). CONCLUSION: HCV screening and treatment of the general adult population is cost-effective compared to screening of high-risk groups or the population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. Public Library of Science 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6261617/ /pubmed/30485377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036 Text en © 2018 Buti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Buti, María Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel Casado, Miguel Ángel Sabater, Eliazar Esteban, Rafael Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title | Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title_full | Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title_fullStr | Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title_full_unstemmed | Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title_short | Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain |
title_sort | healthcare value of implementing hepatitis c screening in the adult general population in spain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butimaria healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain AT dominguezhernandezraquel healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain AT casadomiguelangel healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain AT sabatereliazar healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain AT estebanrafael healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain |