Cargando…

Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain

BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buti, María, Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel, Casado, Miguel Ángel, Sabater, Eliazar, Esteban, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036
_version_ 1783374980264755200
author Buti, María
Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel
Casado, Miguel Ángel
Sabater, Eliazar
Esteban, Rafael
author_facet Buti, María
Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel
Casado, Miguel Ángel
Sabater, Eliazar
Esteban, Rafael
author_sort Buti, María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental cost-utility ratio, ICUR) of 3 HCV screening strategies: a) general population of adults, b) high-risk groups, and c) population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. METHODS: An analytical decision model, projecting progression of the disease over a lifetime, was used to establish the candidate population for HCV screening. HCV data were obtained from the literature: anti-HCV prevalence (0.56%-1.54%), viremic patients (31.5%), and percentage of undiagnosed persons among those with viremia (35%). It was assumed that most patients would be treated and have HCV therapy response (98% SVR); transition probabilities, utilities, and disease management annual costs were obtained from the literature. Efficiency over the life of patients under the National Health System perspective was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total cost (screening, diagnosis, pharmacological and disease management). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. RESULTS: Screening of the adult population would identify a larger number of additional chronic hepatitis C cases (N = 52,694) than screening the highest anti-HCV prevalence population plus high-risk groups (N = 42,027) or screening high-risk groups (N = 26,128). ICUR for the general population vs. high-risk groups was €8914/QALY gained per patient (€18,157 incremental cost and 2.037 QALY). ICUR for the general population vs. population with highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups was €7,448/QALY gained per patient (€7,733 incremental cost and 1.038 QALY). These ICUR values are below the accepted efficiency threshold (€22,000-€30,000). CONCLUSION: HCV screening and treatment of the general adult population is cost-effective compared to screening of high-risk groups or the population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6261617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62616172018-12-19 Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain Buti, María Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel Casado, Miguel Ángel Sabater, Eliazar Esteban, Rafael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires high diagnostic rates and universal access to treatment. Around 40% of infected individuals are unaware of their infection, which indicates that effective screening strategies are needed. We analyzed the efficiency (incremental cost-utility ratio, ICUR) of 3 HCV screening strategies: a) general population of adults, b) high-risk groups, and c) population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. METHODS: An analytical decision model, projecting progression of the disease over a lifetime, was used to establish the candidate population for HCV screening. HCV data were obtained from the literature: anti-HCV prevalence (0.56%-1.54%), viremic patients (31.5%), and percentage of undiagnosed persons among those with viremia (35%). It was assumed that most patients would be treated and have HCV therapy response (98% SVR); transition probabilities, utilities, and disease management annual costs were obtained from the literature. Efficiency over the life of patients under the National Health System perspective was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and total cost (screening, diagnosis, pharmacological and disease management). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. RESULTS: Screening of the adult population would identify a larger number of additional chronic hepatitis C cases (N = 52,694) than screening the highest anti-HCV prevalence population plus high-risk groups (N = 42,027) or screening high-risk groups (N = 26,128). ICUR for the general population vs. high-risk groups was €8914/QALY gained per patient (€18,157 incremental cost and 2.037 QALY). ICUR for the general population vs. population with highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups was €7,448/QALY gained per patient (€7,733 incremental cost and 1.038 QALY). These ICUR values are below the accepted efficiency threshold (€22,000-€30,000). CONCLUSION: HCV screening and treatment of the general adult population is cost-effective compared to screening of high-risk groups or the population with the highest anti-HCV prevalence plus high-risk groups. Public Library of Science 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6261617/ /pubmed/30485377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036 Text en © 2018 Buti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buti, María
Domínguez-Hernández, Raquel
Casado, Miguel Ángel
Sabater, Eliazar
Esteban, Rafael
Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title_full Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title_fullStr Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title_short Healthcare value of implementing hepatitis C screening in the adult general population in Spain
title_sort healthcare value of implementing hepatitis c screening in the adult general population in spain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208036
work_keys_str_mv AT butimaria healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain
AT dominguezhernandezraquel healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain
AT casadomiguelangel healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain
AT sabatereliazar healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain
AT estebanrafael healthcarevalueofimplementinghepatitiscscreeningintheadultgeneralpopulationinspain