Cargando…
Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039 |
_version_ | 1783374994566283264 |
---|---|
author | George, Evalyn I. Brand, Timothy C. LaPorta, Anthony Marescaux, Jacques Satava, Richard M. |
author_facet | George, Evalyn I. Brand, Timothy C. LaPorta, Anthony Marescaux, Jacques Satava, Richard M. |
author_sort | George, Evalyn I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6261744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62617442018-12-06 Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care George, Evalyn I. Brand, Timothy C. LaPorta, Anthony Marescaux, Jacques Satava, Richard M. JSLS Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6261744/ /pubmed/30524184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039 Text en © 2018 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Review George, Evalyn I. Brand, Timothy C. LaPorta, Anthony Marescaux, Jacques Satava, Richard M. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title | Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title_full | Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title_fullStr | Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title_short | Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care |
title_sort | origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georgeevalyni originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare AT brandtimothyc originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare AT laportaanthony originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare AT marescauxjacques originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare AT satavarichardm originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare |