Cargando…

Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Evalyn I., Brand, Timothy C., LaPorta, Anthony, Marescaux, Jacques, Satava, Richard M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039
_version_ 1783374994566283264
author George, Evalyn I.
Brand, Timothy C.
LaPorta, Anthony
Marescaux, Jacques
Satava, Richard M.
author_facet George, Evalyn I.
Brand, Timothy C.
LaPorta, Anthony
Marescaux, Jacques
Satava, Richard M.
author_sort George, Evalyn I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6261744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62617442018-12-06 Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care George, Evalyn I. Brand, Timothy C. LaPorta, Anthony Marescaux, Jacques Satava, Richard M. JSLS Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6261744/ /pubmed/30524184 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039 Text en © 2018 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Review
George, Evalyn I.
Brand, Timothy C.
LaPorta, Anthony
Marescaux, Jacques
Satava, Richard M.
Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title_full Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title_fullStr Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title_full_unstemmed Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title_short Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care
title_sort origins of robotic surgery: from skepticism to standard of care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6261744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524184
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeevalyni originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare
AT brandtimothyc originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare
AT laportaanthony originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare
AT marescauxjacques originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare
AT satavarichardm originsofroboticsurgeryfromskepticismtostandardofcare