Cargando…

Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera

Helicoverpa armigera can develop resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which threaten the long-term success of Bt crops. In the present study, RNAseq was employed to investigate the midgut genes response to strains with different levels of resistance (LF5, LF10, LF20, LF30, LF60, and LF120) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Jizhen, Yang, Shuo, Chen, Lin, Liu, Xiaoguang, Du, Mengfang, An, Shiheng, Liang, Gemei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01653
_version_ 1783375037949018112
author Wei, Jizhen
Yang, Shuo
Chen, Lin
Liu, Xiaoguang
Du, Mengfang
An, Shiheng
Liang, Gemei
author_facet Wei, Jizhen
Yang, Shuo
Chen, Lin
Liu, Xiaoguang
Du, Mengfang
An, Shiheng
Liang, Gemei
author_sort Wei, Jizhen
collection PubMed
description Helicoverpa armigera can develop resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which threaten the long-term success of Bt crops. In the present study, RNAseq was employed to investigate the midgut genes response to strains with different levels of resistance (LF5, LF10, LF20, LF30, LF60, and LF120) in H. armigera. Results revealed that a series of differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) were expressed significantly in resistant strains compared with the LF-susceptible strain. Nine trypsin genes, ALP2, were downregulated significantly in all the six resistant strains and further verified by qRT-PCR, indicating that these genes may be used as markers to monitor and manage pest resistance in transgenic crops. Most importantly, the differences in DEG functions in the different resistant strains revealed that different resistance mechanisms may develop during the evolution of resistance. The immune and detoxification processes appear to be associated with the low-level resistance (LF5 strain). Metabolic process-related macromolecules possibly lead to resistance to Cry1Ac in the LF10 and LF20 strains. The DEGs involved in the “proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex” and the “proton-transporting two-sector ATPase complex” were significantly expressed in the LF30 strain, probably causing resistance to Cry1Ac in the LF30 strain. The DEGs involved in binding and iron ion homeostasis appear to lead to high-level resistance in the LF60 and LF120 strains, respectively. The multiple genes and different pathways seem to be involved in Cry1Ac resistance depending on the levels of resistance. Although the mechanisms of resistance are very complex in H. armigera, a main pathway seemingly exists, which contributes to resistance in each level of resistant strain. Altogether, the findings in the current study provide a transcriptome-based foundation for identifying the functional genes involved in Cry1Ac resistance in H. armigera.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6262065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62620652018-12-06 Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera Wei, Jizhen Yang, Shuo Chen, Lin Liu, Xiaoguang Du, Mengfang An, Shiheng Liang, Gemei Front Physiol Physiology Helicoverpa armigera can develop resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which threaten the long-term success of Bt crops. In the present study, RNAseq was employed to investigate the midgut genes response to strains with different levels of resistance (LF5, LF10, LF20, LF30, LF60, and LF120) in H. armigera. Results revealed that a series of differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) were expressed significantly in resistant strains compared with the LF-susceptible strain. Nine trypsin genes, ALP2, were downregulated significantly in all the six resistant strains and further verified by qRT-PCR, indicating that these genes may be used as markers to monitor and manage pest resistance in transgenic crops. Most importantly, the differences in DEG functions in the different resistant strains revealed that different resistance mechanisms may develop during the evolution of resistance. The immune and detoxification processes appear to be associated with the low-level resistance (LF5 strain). Metabolic process-related macromolecules possibly lead to resistance to Cry1Ac in the LF10 and LF20 strains. The DEGs involved in the “proton-transporting V-type ATPase complex” and the “proton-transporting two-sector ATPase complex” were significantly expressed in the LF30 strain, probably causing resistance to Cry1Ac in the LF30 strain. The DEGs involved in binding and iron ion homeostasis appear to lead to high-level resistance in the LF60 and LF120 strains, respectively. The multiple genes and different pathways seem to be involved in Cry1Ac resistance depending on the levels of resistance. Although the mechanisms of resistance are very complex in H. armigera, a main pathway seemingly exists, which contributes to resistance in each level of resistant strain. Altogether, the findings in the current study provide a transcriptome-based foundation for identifying the functional genes involved in Cry1Ac resistance in H. armigera. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6262065/ /pubmed/30524311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01653 Text en Copyright © 2018 Wei, Yang, Chen, Liu, Du, An and Liang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Wei, Jizhen
Yang, Shuo
Chen, Lin
Liu, Xiaoguang
Du, Mengfang
An, Shiheng
Liang, Gemei
Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title_full Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title_fullStr Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title_short Transcriptomic Responses to Different Cry1Ac Selection Stresses in Helicoverpa armigera
title_sort transcriptomic responses to different cry1ac selection stresses in helicoverpa armigera
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01653
work_keys_str_mv AT weijizhen transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT yangshuo transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT chenlin transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT liuxiaoguang transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT dumengfang transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT anshiheng transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera
AT lianggemei transcriptomicresponsestodifferentcry1acselectionstressesinhelicoverpaarmigera