Cargando…

A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study

BACKGROUND: During intrahospital transport, adverse events are inevitable. Real-time monitoring can be helpful for preventing these events during intrahospital transport. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the viability of risk signal detection using wearable devices and mobile apps during intraho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jang Ho, Park, Yu Rang, Kweon, Solbi, Kim, Seulgi, Ji, Wonjun, Choi, Chang-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429115
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12048
_version_ 1783375059027492864
author Lee, Jang Ho
Park, Yu Rang
Kweon, Solbi
Kim, Seulgi
Ji, Wonjun
Choi, Chang-Min
author_facet Lee, Jang Ho
Park, Yu Rang
Kweon, Solbi
Kim, Seulgi
Ji, Wonjun
Choi, Chang-Min
author_sort Lee, Jang Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During intrahospital transport, adverse events are inevitable. Real-time monitoring can be helpful for preventing these events during intrahospital transport. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the viability of risk signal detection using wearable devices and mobile apps during intrahospital transport. An alarm was sent to clinicians in the event of oxygen saturation below 90%, heart rate above 140 or below 60 beats per minute (bpm), and network errors. We validated the reliability of the risk signal transmitted over the network. METHODS: We used two wearable devices to monitor oxygen saturation and heart rate for 23 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic workup or rehabilitation. To determine the agreement between the devices, records collected every 4 seconds were matched and imputation was performed if no records were collected at the same time by both devices. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to evaluate the relationships between the two devices. RESULTS: Data for 21 patients were delivered to the cloud over LTE, and data for two patients were delivered over Wi-Fi. Monitoring devices were used for 20 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic work up and for three patients during rehabilitation. Three patients using supplemental oxygen before the study were included. In our study, the ICC for the heart rate between the two devices was 0.940 (95% CI 0.939-0.942) and that of oxygen saturation was 0.719 (95% CI 0.711-0.727). Systemic error analyzed with Bland-Altman analysis was 0.428 for heart rate and –1.404 for oxygen saturation. During the study, 14 patients had 20 risk signals: nine signals for eight patients with less than 90% oxygen saturation, four for four patients with a heart rate of 60 bpm or less, and seven for five patients due to network error. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a system that notifies the health care provider of the risk level of a patient during transportation using a wearable device and a mobile app. Although there were some problems such as missing values and network errors, this paper is meaningful in that the previously mentioned risk detection system was validated with actual patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6262206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62622062019-01-16 A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study Lee, Jang Ho Park, Yu Rang Kweon, Solbi Kim, Seulgi Ji, Wonjun Choi, Chang-Min JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: During intrahospital transport, adverse events are inevitable. Real-time monitoring can be helpful for preventing these events during intrahospital transport. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the viability of risk signal detection using wearable devices and mobile apps during intrahospital transport. An alarm was sent to clinicians in the event of oxygen saturation below 90%, heart rate above 140 or below 60 beats per minute (bpm), and network errors. We validated the reliability of the risk signal transmitted over the network. METHODS: We used two wearable devices to monitor oxygen saturation and heart rate for 23 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic workup or rehabilitation. To determine the agreement between the devices, records collected every 4 seconds were matched and imputation was performed if no records were collected at the same time by both devices. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to evaluate the relationships between the two devices. RESULTS: Data for 21 patients were delivered to the cloud over LTE, and data for two patients were delivered over Wi-Fi. Monitoring devices were used for 20 patients during intrahospital transport for diagnostic work up and for three patients during rehabilitation. Three patients using supplemental oxygen before the study were included. In our study, the ICC for the heart rate between the two devices was 0.940 (95% CI 0.939-0.942) and that of oxygen saturation was 0.719 (95% CI 0.711-0.727). Systemic error analyzed with Bland-Altman analysis was 0.428 for heart rate and –1.404 for oxygen saturation. During the study, 14 patients had 20 risk signals: nine signals for eight patients with less than 90% oxygen saturation, four for four patients with a heart rate of 60 bpm or less, and seven for five patients due to network error. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a system that notifies the health care provider of the risk level of a patient during transportation using a wearable device and a mobile app. Although there were some problems such as missing values and network errors, this paper is meaningful in that the previously mentioned risk detection system was validated with actual patients. JMIR Publications 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6262206/ /pubmed/30429115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12048 Text en ©Jang Ho Lee, Yu Rang Park, Solbi Kweon, Seulgi Kim, Wonjun Ji, Chang-Min Choi. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 14.11.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lee, Jang Ho
Park, Yu Rang
Kweon, Solbi
Kim, Seulgi
Ji, Wonjun
Choi, Chang-Min
A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title_full A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title_fullStr A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title_short A Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System for Patient Transport Within Hospitals Using Mobile Internet of Things Technology: Observational Validation Study
title_sort cardiopulmonary monitoring system for patient transport within hospitals using mobile internet of things technology: observational validation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429115
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12048
work_keys_str_mv AT leejangho acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT parkyurang acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT kweonsolbi acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT kimseulgi acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT jiwonjun acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT choichangmin acardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT leejangho cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT parkyurang cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT kweonsolbi cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT kimseulgi cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT jiwonjun cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy
AT choichangmin cardiopulmonarymonitoringsystemforpatienttransportwithinhospitalsusingmobileinternetofthingstechnologyobservationalvalidationstudy