Cargando…
Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616 |
_version_ | 1783375189497610240 |
---|---|
author | De Souza, Daiana A. Kaftanoglu, Osman De Jong, David Page, Robert E. Amdam, Gro V. Wang, Ying |
author_facet | De Souza, Daiana A. Kaftanoglu, Osman De Jong, David Page, Robert E. Amdam, Gro V. Wang, Ying |
author_sort | De Souza, Daiana A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing techniques have been improved and used in many studies; they can produce queen-like and worker-like bees. Here, we questioned whether queens and workers reared in vitro are the same as queens and workers reared in a natural hive environment. We reared workers and queens both in vitro and naturally in beehives to test how these different environments affect metabolic physiology and candidate genes in newly emerged queens and workers. We found that sugar (glucose and trehalose) levels differed between queens and workers in both in vitro and in-hive-reared bees. The in vitro-reared bees had significantly higher levels of lipids in the abdomen. Moreover, hive reared queens had almost 20 times higher levels of vitellogenin than in vitro-reared queens, despite similar morphologies. In addition, hive-reared bees had significantly higher levels of expression of mrjp1. In conclusion, in vitro rearing produces queens and workers that differ from those reared in the hive environment at physiological and gene expression levels. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6262861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62628612018-11-30 Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ De Souza, Daiana A. Kaftanoglu, Osman De Jong, David Page, Robert E. Amdam, Gro V. Wang, Ying Biol Open Research Article The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing techniques have been improved and used in many studies; they can produce queen-like and worker-like bees. Here, we questioned whether queens and workers reared in vitro are the same as queens and workers reared in a natural hive environment. We reared workers and queens both in vitro and naturally in beehives to test how these different environments affect metabolic physiology and candidate genes in newly emerged queens and workers. We found that sugar (glucose and trehalose) levels differed between queens and workers in both in vitro and in-hive-reared bees. The in vitro-reared bees had significantly higher levels of lipids in the abdomen. Moreover, hive reared queens had almost 20 times higher levels of vitellogenin than in vitro-reared queens, despite similar morphologies. In addition, hive-reared bees had significantly higher levels of expression of mrjp1. In conclusion, in vitro rearing produces queens and workers that differ from those reared in the hive environment at physiological and gene expression levels. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6262861/ /pubmed/30341101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616 Text en © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article De Souza, Daiana A. Kaftanoglu, Osman De Jong, David Page, Robert E. Amdam, Gro V. Wang, Ying Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title | Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title_full | Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title_fullStr | Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title_short | Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
title_sort | differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desouzadaianaa differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu AT kaftanogluosman differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu AT dejongdavid differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu AT pageroberte differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu AT amdamgrov differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu AT wangying differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu |