Cargando…

Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ

The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Souza, Daiana A., Kaftanoglu, Osman, De Jong, David, Page, Robert E., Amdam, Gro V., Wang, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616
_version_ 1783375189497610240
author De Souza, Daiana A.
Kaftanoglu, Osman
De Jong, David
Page, Robert E.
Amdam, Gro V.
Wang, Ying
author_facet De Souza, Daiana A.
Kaftanoglu, Osman
De Jong, David
Page, Robert E.
Amdam, Gro V.
Wang, Ying
author_sort De Souza, Daiana A.
collection PubMed
description The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing techniques have been improved and used in many studies; they can produce queen-like and worker-like bees. Here, we questioned whether queens and workers reared in vitro are the same as queens and workers reared in a natural hive environment. We reared workers and queens both in vitro and naturally in beehives to test how these different environments affect metabolic physiology and candidate genes in newly emerged queens and workers. We found that sugar (glucose and trehalose) levels differed between queens and workers in both in vitro and in-hive-reared bees. The in vitro-reared bees had significantly higher levels of lipids in the abdomen. Moreover, hive reared queens had almost 20 times higher levels of vitellogenin than in vitro-reared queens, despite similar morphologies. In addition, hive-reared bees had significantly higher levels of expression of mrjp1. In conclusion, in vitro rearing produces queens and workers that differ from those reared in the hive environment at physiological and gene expression levels. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6262861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62628612018-11-30 Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ De Souza, Daiana A. Kaftanoglu, Osman De Jong, David Page, Robert E. Amdam, Gro V. Wang, Ying Biol Open Research Article The effect of larval nutrition on female fertility in honey bees is a focus for both scientific studies and for practical applications in beekeeping. In general, morphological traits are standards for classifying queens and workers and for evaluating their quality. In recent years, in vitro rearing techniques have been improved and used in many studies; they can produce queen-like and worker-like bees. Here, we questioned whether queens and workers reared in vitro are the same as queens and workers reared in a natural hive environment. We reared workers and queens both in vitro and naturally in beehives to test how these different environments affect metabolic physiology and candidate genes in newly emerged queens and workers. We found that sugar (glucose and trehalose) levels differed between queens and workers in both in vitro and in-hive-reared bees. The in vitro-reared bees had significantly higher levels of lipids in the abdomen. Moreover, hive reared queens had almost 20 times higher levels of vitellogenin than in vitro-reared queens, despite similar morphologies. In addition, hive-reared bees had significantly higher levels of expression of mrjp1. In conclusion, in vitro rearing produces queens and workers that differ from those reared in the hive environment at physiological and gene expression levels. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6262861/ /pubmed/30341101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616 Text en © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Souza, Daiana A.
Kaftanoglu, Osman
De Jong, David
Page, Robert E.
Amdam, Gro V.
Wang, Ying
Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title_full Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title_fullStr Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title_short Differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
title_sort differences in the morphology, physiology and gene expression of honey bee queens and workers reared in vitro versus in situ
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6262861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30341101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/bio.036616
work_keys_str_mv AT desouzadaianaa differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu
AT kaftanogluosman differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu
AT dejongdavid differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu
AT pageroberte differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu
AT amdamgrov differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu
AT wangying differencesinthemorphologyphysiologyandgeneexpressionofhoneybeequeensandworkersrearedinvitroversusinsitu