Cargando…
Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness?
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of evidence for efficacy of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) for rare malignancies may be hampered by the use of tumor measurements instead of clinical endpoints. This may cause efficacy data to not always match effectiveness in the real-world. We investigated whether an effic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0900-9 |
_version_ | 1783375228279193600 |
---|---|
author | Schuller, Yvonne Biegstraaten, Marieke Hollak, Carla E. M. Klümpen, Heinz-Josef Gispen-de Wied, Christine C. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta |
author_facet | Schuller, Yvonne Biegstraaten, Marieke Hollak, Carla E. M. Klümpen, Heinz-Josef Gispen-de Wied, Christine C. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta |
author_sort | Schuller, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Evaluation of evidence for efficacy of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) for rare malignancies may be hampered by the use of tumor measurements instead of clinical endpoints. This may cause efficacy data to not always match effectiveness in the real-world. We investigated whether an efficacy-effectiveness gap exists for oncologic OMPs and aimed to identify which factors contribute to it. Also, the magnitude of the clinical efficacy of oncologic OMPs was evaluated. METHODS: We included all oncologic OMPs authorized in the European Union from 2000 to 2017. Pivotal studies were evaluated by means of the European Society for Medical Oncology - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). To estimate real-world effectiveness, a literature search was performed to identify post-marketing studies, of which data on overall survival (OS) were extracted. OS of the new OMP was compared with OS data of standard of care. An OS gain of ≥3 months compared to pre-marketing data was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Twenty OMPs were included, of which 5 were authorized based on OS as a primary endpoint. 10 OMPs had post-marketing data available, of which 40% did not show a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. All OMPs that were studied with OS as primary endpoint in the pivotal study had a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. Furthermore, all OMPs that had a high ESMO-MCBS score and post-marketing data available, resulted in a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, our results indicate an efficacy-effectiveness gap for oncologic OMPs exists. Significant changes in PFS do not always lead to an increased OS. The use of PFS may be justified, but validation of surrogate endpoints is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0900-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6263065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62630652018-12-05 Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? Schuller, Yvonne Biegstraaten, Marieke Hollak, Carla E. M. Klümpen, Heinz-Josef Gispen-de Wied, Christine C. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of evidence for efficacy of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) for rare malignancies may be hampered by the use of tumor measurements instead of clinical endpoints. This may cause efficacy data to not always match effectiveness in the real-world. We investigated whether an efficacy-effectiveness gap exists for oncologic OMPs and aimed to identify which factors contribute to it. Also, the magnitude of the clinical efficacy of oncologic OMPs was evaluated. METHODS: We included all oncologic OMPs authorized in the European Union from 2000 to 2017. Pivotal studies were evaluated by means of the European Society for Medical Oncology - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). To estimate real-world effectiveness, a literature search was performed to identify post-marketing studies, of which data on overall survival (OS) were extracted. OS of the new OMP was compared with OS data of standard of care. An OS gain of ≥3 months compared to pre-marketing data was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Twenty OMPs were included, of which 5 were authorized based on OS as a primary endpoint. 10 OMPs had post-marketing data available, of which 40% did not show a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. All OMPs that were studied with OS as primary endpoint in the pivotal study had a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. Furthermore, all OMPs that had a high ESMO-MCBS score and post-marketing data available, resulted in a clinically relevant OS gain in the real world. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, our results indicate an efficacy-effectiveness gap for oncologic OMPs exists. Significant changes in PFS do not always lead to an increased OS. The use of PFS may be justified, but validation of surrogate endpoints is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0900-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6263065/ /pubmed/30486835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0900-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Schuller, Yvonne Biegstraaten, Marieke Hollak, Carla E. M. Klümpen, Heinz-Josef Gispen-de Wied, Christine C. Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title | Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title_full | Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title_fullStr | Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title_short | Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
title_sort | oncologic orphan drugs approved in the eu – do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0900-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulleryvonne oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness AT biegstraatenmarieke oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness AT hollakcarlaem oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness AT klumpenheinzjosef oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness AT gispendewiedchristinec oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness AT stoyanovabeninskavioleta oncologicorphandrugsapprovedintheeudoclinicaltrialdatacorrespondwithrealworldeffectiveness |