Cargando…
Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincisio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456 |
_version_ | 1783375250152488960 |
---|---|
author | Yomoda, Ryo Sasaki, Hiroki Kogo, Jiro Shiono, Akira Jujo, Tatsuya Sekine, Reio Tokuda, Naoto Kitaoka, Yasushi Takagi, Hitoshi |
author_facet | Yomoda, Ryo Sasaki, Hiroki Kogo, Jiro Shiono, Akira Jujo, Tatsuya Sekine, Reio Tokuda, Naoto Kitaoka, Yasushi Takagi, Hitoshi |
author_sort | Yomoda, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups. CONCLUSION: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6263245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62632452018-12-11 Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane Yomoda, Ryo Sasaki, Hiroki Kogo, Jiro Shiono, Akira Jujo, Tatsuya Sekine, Reio Tokuda, Naoto Kitaoka, Yasushi Takagi, Hitoshi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups. CONCLUSION: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6263245/ /pubmed/30538424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456 Text en © 2018 Yomoda et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yomoda, Ryo Sasaki, Hiroki Kogo, Jiro Shiono, Akira Jujo, Tatsuya Sekine, Reio Tokuda, Naoto Kitaoka, Yasushi Takagi, Hitoshi Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title | Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title_full | Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title_short | Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
title_sort | comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yomodaryo comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT sasakihiroki comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT kogojiro comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT shionoakira comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT jujotatsuya comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT sekinereio comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT tokudanaoto comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT kitaokayasushi comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane AT takagihitoshi comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane |