Cargando…

Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincisio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yomoda, Ryo, Sasaki, Hiroki, Kogo, Jiro, Shiono, Akira, Jujo, Tatsuya, Sekine, Reio, Tokuda, Naoto, Kitaoka, Yasushi, Takagi, Hitoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538424
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456
_version_ 1783375250152488960
author Yomoda, Ryo
Sasaki, Hiroki
Kogo, Jiro
Shiono, Akira
Jujo, Tatsuya
Sekine, Reio
Tokuda, Naoto
Kitaoka, Yasushi
Takagi, Hitoshi
author_facet Yomoda, Ryo
Sasaki, Hiroki
Kogo, Jiro
Shiono, Akira
Jujo, Tatsuya
Sekine, Reio
Tokuda, Naoto
Kitaoka, Yasushi
Takagi, Hitoshi
author_sort Yomoda, Ryo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups. CONCLUSION: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6263245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62632452018-12-11 Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane Yomoda, Ryo Sasaki, Hiroki Kogo, Jiro Shiono, Akira Jujo, Tatsuya Sekine, Reio Tokuda, Naoto Kitaoka, Yasushi Takagi, Hitoshi Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare straight and angled incisions in 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Seventy-three eyes of 68 patients with ERM who underwent straight (35 eyes) or angled incision (38 eyes) for 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity. The intraocular pressure and rate of hypotony 1 day postoperatively did not differ between the straight- and angled-incision groups (intraocular pressure: 11.5 vs 13.4 mmHg, respectively; rate of hypotony: 20% vs 8%, respectively). Surgical wound closing occurred by postoperative day 10 in both groups. CONCLUSION: A straight incision is as safe and useful in ERM vitrectomy as an angled one. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6263245/ /pubmed/30538424 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456 Text en © 2018 Yomoda et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yomoda, Ryo
Sasaki, Hiroki
Kogo, Jiro
Shiono, Akira
Jujo, Tatsuya
Sekine, Reio
Tokuda, Naoto
Kitaoka, Yasushi
Takagi, Hitoshi
Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_full Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_fullStr Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_short Comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
title_sort comparative study of straight vs angled incision in 27-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30538424
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S183456
work_keys_str_mv AT yomodaryo comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT sasakihiroki comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT kogojiro comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT shionoakira comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT jujotatsuya comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT sekinereio comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT tokudanaoto comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT kitaokayasushi comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane
AT takagihitoshi comparativestudyofstraightvsangledincisionin27gaugevitrectomyforepiretinalmembrane