Cargando…

Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals

INTRODUCTION: Online media may influence women’s decision to undergo vaccination during pregnancy. The aims of this mixed-methods study were to: (1) examine the portrayal of maternal vaccination in online media and (2) establish the perceived target of vaccine protection as viewed by pregnant women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilcox, Christopher R, Bottrell, Kathryn, Paterson, Pauline, Schulz, William S, Vandrevala, Tushna, Larson, Heidi J, Jones, Christine E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.092
_version_ 1783375256729157632
author Wilcox, Christopher R
Bottrell, Kathryn
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S
Vandrevala, Tushna
Larson, Heidi J
Jones, Christine E
author_facet Wilcox, Christopher R
Bottrell, Kathryn
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S
Vandrevala, Tushna
Larson, Heidi J
Jones, Christine E
author_sort Wilcox, Christopher R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Online media may influence women’s decision to undergo vaccination during pregnancy. The aims of this mixed-methods study were to: (1) examine the portrayal of maternal vaccination in online media and (2) establish the perceived target of vaccine protection as viewed by pregnant women and maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Online media articles on maternal vaccination (published July-December 2012 or November 2015-April 2016) were identified through the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine’s Vaccine Confidence Database and thematically analysed. Questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within four English hospitals (July 2017-January 2018). RESULTS: Of 203 articles identified, 60% related to pertussis vaccination, 33% to influenza and 6% both. The majority positively portrayed vaccination in pregnancy (97%), but inaccurate, negative articles persist which criticize pertussis vaccination’s safety and efficacy. Positively-worded articles about pertussis tended to focus on infant protection and highlight examples of recent cases, whereas positively-worded articles about influenza focused on maternal protection. These themes were reflected in questionnaire responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs, who perceived pertussis vaccination as protecting the baby, and influenza vaccination as protecting the mother, or mother and baby equally. A minority of the pregnant women surveyed intended to decline influenza (22%) or pertussis (8%) vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of online articles support pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The portrayal of pertussis vaccination as primarily benefiting the child, using real-examples, may influence its higher uptake compared with influenza. This approach should be considered by HCPs when recommending vaccination. HCPs should be prepared to provide advice to women hesitant about vaccination, including addressing any negative media, and consider educational strategies to counteract inaccurate information. Future studies should directly assess the influence of media on vaccine decision-making and establish which media platforms are typically used by pregnant women to gather information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6263273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62632732018-12-07 Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals Wilcox, Christopher R Bottrell, Kathryn Paterson, Pauline Schulz, William S Vandrevala, Tushna Larson, Heidi J Jones, Christine E Vaccine Article INTRODUCTION: Online media may influence women’s decision to undergo vaccination during pregnancy. The aims of this mixed-methods study were to: (1) examine the portrayal of maternal vaccination in online media and (2) establish the perceived target of vaccine protection as viewed by pregnant women and maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Online media articles on maternal vaccination (published July-December 2012 or November 2015-April 2016) were identified through the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine’s Vaccine Confidence Database and thematically analysed. Questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within four English hospitals (July 2017-January 2018). RESULTS: Of 203 articles identified, 60% related to pertussis vaccination, 33% to influenza and 6% both. The majority positively portrayed vaccination in pregnancy (97%), but inaccurate, negative articles persist which criticize pertussis vaccination’s safety and efficacy. Positively-worded articles about pertussis tended to focus on infant protection and highlight examples of recent cases, whereas positively-worded articles about influenza focused on maternal protection. These themes were reflected in questionnaire responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs, who perceived pertussis vaccination as protecting the baby, and influenza vaccination as protecting the mother, or mother and baby equally. A minority of the pregnant women surveyed intended to decline influenza (22%) or pertussis (8%) vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of online articles support pertussis and influenza vaccination during pregnancy. The portrayal of pertussis vaccination as primarily benefiting the child, using real-examples, may influence its higher uptake compared with influenza. This approach should be considered by HCPs when recommending vaccination. HCPs should be prepared to provide advice to women hesitant about vaccination, including addressing any negative media, and consider educational strategies to counteract inaccurate information. Future studies should directly assess the influence of media on vaccine decision-making and establish which media platforms are typically used by pregnant women to gather information. Elsevier Science 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6263273/ /pubmed/30401620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.092 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wilcox, Christopher R
Bottrell, Kathryn
Paterson, Pauline
Schulz, William S
Vandrevala, Tushna
Larson, Heidi J
Jones, Christine E
Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title_full Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title_short Influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: Portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
title_sort influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy: portrayal in online media articles and perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare professionals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.092
work_keys_str_mv AT wilcoxchristopherr influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT bottrellkathryn influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT patersonpauline influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT schulzwilliams influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT vandrevalatushna influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT larsonheidij influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals
AT joneschristinee influenzaandpertussisvaccinationinpregnancyportrayalinonlinemediaarticlesandperceptionsofpregnantwomenandhealthcareprofessionals