Cargando…

Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS

As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Wenan, Li, Jiating, Bhatta, Madhav, Shi, Yeyin, Baenziger, P. Stephen, Ge, Yufeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731
_version_ 1783375303082508288
author Yuan, Wenan
Li, Jiating
Bhatta, Madhav
Shi, Yeyin
Baenziger, P. Stephen
Ge, Yufeng
author_facet Yuan, Wenan
Li, Jiating
Bhatta, Madhav
Shi, Yeyin
Baenziger, P. Stephen
Ge, Yufeng
author_sort Yuan, Wenan
collection PubMed
description As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research regarding direct comparisons between different height measurement methods seems to be lagging. In this study, a ground-based multi-sensor phenotyping system equipped with ultrasonic sensors and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was developed. Canopy heights of 100 wheat plots were estimated five times during a season by the ground phenotyping system and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the results were compared to manual measurements. Overall, LiDAR provided the best results, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 m and an R(2) of 0.97. UAS obtained reasonable results with an RMSE of 0.09 m and an R(2) of 0.91. Ultrasonic sensors did not perform well due to our static measurement style. In conclusion, we suggest LiDAR and UAS are reliable alternative methods for wheat height evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6263480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62634802018-12-12 Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS Yuan, Wenan Li, Jiating Bhatta, Madhav Shi, Yeyin Baenziger, P. Stephen Ge, Yufeng Sensors (Basel) Article As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research regarding direct comparisons between different height measurement methods seems to be lagging. In this study, a ground-based multi-sensor phenotyping system equipped with ultrasonic sensors and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was developed. Canopy heights of 100 wheat plots were estimated five times during a season by the ground phenotyping system and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the results were compared to manual measurements. Overall, LiDAR provided the best results, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 m and an R(2) of 0.97. UAS obtained reasonable results with an RMSE of 0.09 m and an R(2) of 0.91. Ultrasonic sensors did not perform well due to our static measurement style. In conclusion, we suggest LiDAR and UAS are reliable alternative methods for wheat height evaluation. MDPI 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6263480/ /pubmed/30400154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yuan, Wenan
Li, Jiating
Bhatta, Madhav
Shi, Yeyin
Baenziger, P. Stephen
Ge, Yufeng
Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title_full Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title_fullStr Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title_full_unstemmed Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title_short Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
title_sort wheat height estimation using lidar in comparison to ultrasonic sensor and uas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanwenan wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas
AT lijiating wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas
AT bhattamadhav wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas
AT shiyeyin wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas
AT baenzigerpstephen wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas
AT geyufeng wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas