Cargando…
Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS
As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731 |
_version_ | 1783375303082508288 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Wenan Li, Jiating Bhatta, Madhav Shi, Yeyin Baenziger, P. Stephen Ge, Yufeng |
author_facet | Yuan, Wenan Li, Jiating Bhatta, Madhav Shi, Yeyin Baenziger, P. Stephen Ge, Yufeng |
author_sort | Yuan, Wenan |
collection | PubMed |
description | As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research regarding direct comparisons between different height measurement methods seems to be lagging. In this study, a ground-based multi-sensor phenotyping system equipped with ultrasonic sensors and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was developed. Canopy heights of 100 wheat plots were estimated five times during a season by the ground phenotyping system and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the results were compared to manual measurements. Overall, LiDAR provided the best results, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 m and an R(2) of 0.97. UAS obtained reasonable results with an RMSE of 0.09 m and an R(2) of 0.91. Ultrasonic sensors did not perform well due to our static measurement style. In conclusion, we suggest LiDAR and UAS are reliable alternative methods for wheat height evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6263480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62634802018-12-12 Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS Yuan, Wenan Li, Jiating Bhatta, Madhav Shi, Yeyin Baenziger, P. Stephen Ge, Yufeng Sensors (Basel) Article As one of the key crop traits, plant height is traditionally evaluated manually, which can be slow, laborious and prone to error. Rapid development of remote and proximal sensing technologies in recent years allows plant height to be estimated in more objective and efficient fashions, while research regarding direct comparisons between different height measurement methods seems to be lagging. In this study, a ground-based multi-sensor phenotyping system equipped with ultrasonic sensors and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was developed. Canopy heights of 100 wheat plots were estimated five times during a season by the ground phenotyping system and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), and the results were compared to manual measurements. Overall, LiDAR provided the best results, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.05 m and an R(2) of 0.97. UAS obtained reasonable results with an RMSE of 0.09 m and an R(2) of 0.91. Ultrasonic sensors did not perform well due to our static measurement style. In conclusion, we suggest LiDAR and UAS are reliable alternative methods for wheat height evaluation. MDPI 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6263480/ /pubmed/30400154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yuan, Wenan Li, Jiating Bhatta, Madhav Shi, Yeyin Baenziger, P. Stephen Ge, Yufeng Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title | Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title_full | Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title_fullStr | Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title_full_unstemmed | Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title_short | Wheat Height Estimation Using LiDAR in Comparison to Ultrasonic Sensor and UAS |
title_sort | wheat height estimation using lidar in comparison to ultrasonic sensor and uas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanwenan wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas AT lijiating wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas AT bhattamadhav wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas AT shiyeyin wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas AT baenzigerpstephen wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas AT geyufeng wheatheightestimationusinglidarincomparisontoultrasonicsensoranduas |