Cargando…

End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?

Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Johanna Amalia, Kocman, David, Horvat, Milena, Bartonova, Alena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400374
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768
_version_ 1783375338877747200
author Robinson, Johanna Amalia
Kocman, David
Horvat, Milena
Bartonova, Alena
author_facet Robinson, Johanna Amalia
Kocman, David
Horvat, Milena
Bartonova, Alena
author_sort Robinson, Johanna Amalia
collection PubMed
description Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof of concept, leaving user experience (UX) unstudied. The authors argue that UX should be taken into account to make sure that products and services are fit for purpose. Nineteen volunteers tested and evaluated a prototype device and provided feedback through semi-structured interviews and during focus group sessions. Their UX was then coded using mixed coding methods regarding device functionality and recommendations for future product development. The results indicate that UX can identify potentially problematic design aspects while giving deeper insights into user needs. For example, UX recognized that one of the most important aspects of user involvement and motivation was successful data harvesting, which frequently failed. This study recommends that future developers of low-cost portable air quality sensor systems prioritize reliable data transmission to minimize data loss. This will ensure an efficient and positive UX that supports user engagement in citizen science based research where collecting sensor-based data is the primary objective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6263673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62636732018-12-12 End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? Robinson, Johanna Amalia Kocman, David Horvat, Milena Bartonova, Alena Sensors (Basel) Article Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof of concept, leaving user experience (UX) unstudied. The authors argue that UX should be taken into account to make sure that products and services are fit for purpose. Nineteen volunteers tested and evaluated a prototype device and provided feedback through semi-structured interviews and during focus group sessions. Their UX was then coded using mixed coding methods regarding device functionality and recommendations for future product development. The results indicate that UX can identify potentially problematic design aspects while giving deeper insights into user needs. For example, UX recognized that one of the most important aspects of user involvement and motivation was successful data harvesting, which frequently failed. This study recommends that future developers of low-cost portable air quality sensor systems prioritize reliable data transmission to minimize data loss. This will ensure an efficient and positive UX that supports user engagement in citizen science based research where collecting sensor-based data is the primary objective. MDPI 2018-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6263673/ /pubmed/30400374 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Robinson, Johanna Amalia
Kocman, David
Horvat, Milena
Bartonova, Alena
End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title_full End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title_fullStr End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title_full_unstemmed End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title_short End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
title_sort end-user feedback on a low-cost portable air quality sensor system—are we there yet?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400374
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonjohannaamalia enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet
AT kocmandavid enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet
AT horvatmilena enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet
AT bartonovaalena enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet