Cargando…
End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet?
Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400374 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768 |
_version_ | 1783375338877747200 |
---|---|
author | Robinson, Johanna Amalia Kocman, David Horvat, Milena Bartonova, Alena |
author_facet | Robinson, Johanna Amalia Kocman, David Horvat, Milena Bartonova, Alena |
author_sort | Robinson, Johanna Amalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof of concept, leaving user experience (UX) unstudied. The authors argue that UX should be taken into account to make sure that products and services are fit for purpose. Nineteen volunteers tested and evaluated a prototype device and provided feedback through semi-structured interviews and during focus group sessions. Their UX was then coded using mixed coding methods regarding device functionality and recommendations for future product development. The results indicate that UX can identify potentially problematic design aspects while giving deeper insights into user needs. For example, UX recognized that one of the most important aspects of user involvement and motivation was successful data harvesting, which frequently failed. This study recommends that future developers of low-cost portable air quality sensor systems prioritize reliable data transmission to minimize data loss. This will ensure an efficient and positive UX that supports user engagement in citizen science based research where collecting sensor-based data is the primary objective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6263673 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62636732018-12-12 End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? Robinson, Johanna Amalia Kocman, David Horvat, Milena Bartonova, Alena Sensors (Basel) Article Low-cost sensors are a current trend in citizen science projects that focus on air quality. Until now, devices incorporating such sensors have been tested primarily for their technical capabilities and limitations, whereas their usability and acceptability amongst the public rarely goes beyond proof of concept, leaving user experience (UX) unstudied. The authors argue that UX should be taken into account to make sure that products and services are fit for purpose. Nineteen volunteers tested and evaluated a prototype device and provided feedback through semi-structured interviews and during focus group sessions. Their UX was then coded using mixed coding methods regarding device functionality and recommendations for future product development. The results indicate that UX can identify potentially problematic design aspects while giving deeper insights into user needs. For example, UX recognized that one of the most important aspects of user involvement and motivation was successful data harvesting, which frequently failed. This study recommends that future developers of low-cost portable air quality sensor systems prioritize reliable data transmission to minimize data loss. This will ensure an efficient and positive UX that supports user engagement in citizen science based research where collecting sensor-based data is the primary objective. MDPI 2018-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6263673/ /pubmed/30400374 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Robinson, Johanna Amalia Kocman, David Horvat, Milena Bartonova, Alena End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title | End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title_full | End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title_fullStr | End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title_short | End-User Feedback on a Low-Cost Portable Air Quality Sensor System—Are We There Yet? |
title_sort | end-user feedback on a low-cost portable air quality sensor system—are we there yet? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263673/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400374 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinsonjohannaamalia enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet AT kocmandavid enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet AT horvatmilena enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet AT bartonovaalena enduserfeedbackonalowcostportableairqualitysensorsystemarewethereyet |