Cargando…
Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alterna...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039 |
_version_ | 1783375344664838144 |
---|---|
author | Chilipirea, Cristian Baratchi, Mitra Dobre, Ciprian van Steen, Maarten |
author_facet | Chilipirea, Cristian Baratchi, Mitra Dobre, Ciprian van Steen, Maarten |
author_sort | Chilipirea, Cristian |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alternative techniques. WiFi tracking is a scalable solution that has gained attention recently. This method permits unobtrusive tracking of large crowds, at a reduced cost. However, extracting knowledge from the data gathered through WiFi tracking is not simple, due to the low positional accuracy and the dependence on signals generated by the tracked device, which are irregular and sparse. To facilitate further data analysis, we can partition individual trajectories into periods of stops and moves. This abstraction level is fundamental, and it opens the way for answering complex questions about visited locations or even social behavior. Determining stops and movements has been previously addressed for tracking data gathered using GPS. GPS trajectories have higher positional accuracy at a fixed, higher frequency as compared to trajectories obtained through WiFi. However, even with the increase in accuracy, the problem, of separating traces in periods of stops and movements, remains similar to the one we encountered for WiFi tracking. In this paper, we study three algorithms for determining stops and movements for GPS-based datasets and explore their applicability to WiFi-based data. We propose possible improvements to the best-performing algorithm considering the specifics of WiFi tracking data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6263698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62636982018-12-12 Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data Chilipirea, Cristian Baratchi, Mitra Dobre, Ciprian van Steen, Maarten Sensors (Basel) Article There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alternative techniques. WiFi tracking is a scalable solution that has gained attention recently. This method permits unobtrusive tracking of large crowds, at a reduced cost. However, extracting knowledge from the data gathered through WiFi tracking is not simple, due to the low positional accuracy and the dependence on signals generated by the tracked device, which are irregular and sparse. To facilitate further data analysis, we can partition individual trajectories into periods of stops and moves. This abstraction level is fundamental, and it opens the way for answering complex questions about visited locations or even social behavior. Determining stops and movements has been previously addressed for tracking data gathered using GPS. GPS trajectories have higher positional accuracy at a fixed, higher frequency as compared to trajectories obtained through WiFi. However, even with the increase in accuracy, the problem, of separating traces in periods of stops and movements, remains similar to the one we encountered for WiFi tracking. In this paper, we study three algorithms for determining stops and movements for GPS-based datasets and explore their applicability to WiFi-based data. We propose possible improvements to the best-performing algorithm considering the specifics of WiFi tracking data. MDPI 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6263698/ /pubmed/30463269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chilipirea, Cristian Baratchi, Mitra Dobre, Ciprian van Steen, Maarten Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title | Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title_full | Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title_fullStr | Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title_short | Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data |
title_sort | identifying stops and moves in wifi tracking data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chilipireacristian identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata AT baratchimitra identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata AT dobreciprian identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata AT vansteenmaarten identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata |