Cargando…

Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data

There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alterna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chilipirea, Cristian, Baratchi, Mitra, Dobre, Ciprian, van Steen, Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039
_version_ 1783375344664838144
author Chilipirea, Cristian
Baratchi, Mitra
Dobre, Ciprian
van Steen, Maarten
author_facet Chilipirea, Cristian
Baratchi, Mitra
Dobre, Ciprian
van Steen, Maarten
author_sort Chilipirea, Cristian
collection PubMed
description There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alternative techniques. WiFi tracking is a scalable solution that has gained attention recently. This method permits unobtrusive tracking of large crowds, at a reduced cost. However, extracting knowledge from the data gathered through WiFi tracking is not simple, due to the low positional accuracy and the dependence on signals generated by the tracked device, which are irregular and sparse. To facilitate further data analysis, we can partition individual trajectories into periods of stops and moves. This abstraction level is fundamental, and it opens the way for answering complex questions about visited locations or even social behavior. Determining stops and movements has been previously addressed for tracking data gathered using GPS. GPS trajectories have higher positional accuracy at a fixed, higher frequency as compared to trajectories obtained through WiFi. However, even with the increase in accuracy, the problem, of separating traces in periods of stops and movements, remains similar to the one we encountered for WiFi tracking. In this paper, we study three algorithms for determining stops and movements for GPS-based datasets and explore their applicability to WiFi-based data. We propose possible improvements to the best-performing algorithm considering the specifics of WiFi tracking data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6263698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62636982018-12-12 Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data Chilipirea, Cristian Baratchi, Mitra Dobre, Ciprian van Steen, Maarten Sensors (Basel) Article There are multiple methods for tracking individuals, but the classical ones such as using GPS or video surveillance systems do not scale or have large costs. The need for large-scale tracking, for thousands or even millions of individuals, over large areas such as cities, requires the use of alternative techniques. WiFi tracking is a scalable solution that has gained attention recently. This method permits unobtrusive tracking of large crowds, at a reduced cost. However, extracting knowledge from the data gathered through WiFi tracking is not simple, due to the low positional accuracy and the dependence on signals generated by the tracked device, which are irregular and sparse. To facilitate further data analysis, we can partition individual trajectories into periods of stops and moves. This abstraction level is fundamental, and it opens the way for answering complex questions about visited locations or even social behavior. Determining stops and movements has been previously addressed for tracking data gathered using GPS. GPS trajectories have higher positional accuracy at a fixed, higher frequency as compared to trajectories obtained through WiFi. However, even with the increase in accuracy, the problem, of separating traces in periods of stops and movements, remains similar to the one we encountered for WiFi tracking. In this paper, we study three algorithms for determining stops and movements for GPS-based datasets and explore their applicability to WiFi-based data. We propose possible improvements to the best-performing algorithm considering the specifics of WiFi tracking data. MDPI 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6263698/ /pubmed/30463269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chilipirea, Cristian
Baratchi, Mitra
Dobre, Ciprian
van Steen, Maarten
Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title_full Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title_fullStr Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title_short Identifying Stops and Moves in WiFi Tracking Data
title_sort identifying stops and moves in wifi tracking data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18114039
work_keys_str_mv AT chilipireacristian identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata
AT baratchimitra identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata
AT dobreciprian identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata
AT vansteenmaarten identifyingstopsandmovesinwifitrackingdata