Cargando…
Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994 |
_version_ | 1783375397240438784 |
---|---|
author | Delforouzi, Ahmad Pamarthi, Bhargav Grzegorzek, Marcin |
author_facet | Delforouzi, Ahmad Pamarthi, Bhargav Grzegorzek, Marcin |
author_sort | Delforouzi, Ahmad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher level applications like object tracking in videos. This paper presents a comparative study of outstanding learning-based object detectors such as ACF, Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN), FastRCNN, FasterRCNN and You Only Look Once (YOLO) for object tracking. We use an online and offline training method for tracking. The online tracker trains the detectors with a generated synthetic set of images from the object of interest in the first frame. Then, the detectors detect the objects of interest in the next frames. The detector is updated online by using the detected objects from the last frames of the video. The offline tracker uses the detector for object detection in still images and then a tracker based on Kalman filter associates the objects among video frames. Our research is performed on a TLD dataset which contains challenging situations for tracking. Source codes and implementation details for the trackers are published to make both the reproduction of the results reported in this paper and the re-use and further development of the trackers for other researchers. The results demonstrate that ACF and YOLO trackers show more stability than the other trackers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6264009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62640092018-12-12 Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking Delforouzi, Ahmad Pamarthi, Bhargav Grzegorzek, Marcin Sensors (Basel) Article Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher level applications like object tracking in videos. This paper presents a comparative study of outstanding learning-based object detectors such as ACF, Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN), FastRCNN, FasterRCNN and You Only Look Once (YOLO) for object tracking. We use an online and offline training method for tracking. The online tracker trains the detectors with a generated synthetic set of images from the object of interest in the first frame. Then, the detectors detect the objects of interest in the next frames. The detector is updated online by using the detected objects from the last frames of the video. The offline tracker uses the detector for object detection in still images and then a tracker based on Kalman filter associates the objects among video frames. Our research is performed on a TLD dataset which contains challenging situations for tracking. Source codes and implementation details for the trackers are published to make both the reproduction of the results reported in this paper and the re-use and further development of the trackers for other researchers. The results demonstrate that ACF and YOLO trackers show more stability than the other trackers. MDPI 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6264009/ /pubmed/30453520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Delforouzi, Ahmad Pamarthi, Bhargav Grzegorzek, Marcin Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title | Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title_full | Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title_fullStr | Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title_short | Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking |
title_sort | training-based methods for comparison of object detection methods for visual object tracking |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delforouziahmad trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking AT pamarthibhargav trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking AT grzegorzekmarcin trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking |