Cargando…

Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking

Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delforouzi, Ahmad, Pamarthi, Bhargav, Grzegorzek, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994
_version_ 1783375397240438784
author Delforouzi, Ahmad
Pamarthi, Bhargav
Grzegorzek, Marcin
author_facet Delforouzi, Ahmad
Pamarthi, Bhargav
Grzegorzek, Marcin
author_sort Delforouzi, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher level applications like object tracking in videos. This paper presents a comparative study of outstanding learning-based object detectors such as ACF, Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN), FastRCNN, FasterRCNN and You Only Look Once (YOLO) for object tracking. We use an online and offline training method for tracking. The online tracker trains the detectors with a generated synthetic set of images from the object of interest in the first frame. Then, the detectors detect the objects of interest in the next frames. The detector is updated online by using the detected objects from the last frames of the video. The offline tracker uses the detector for object detection in still images and then a tracker based on Kalman filter associates the objects among video frames. Our research is performed on a TLD dataset which contains challenging situations for tracking. Source codes and implementation details for the trackers are published to make both the reproduction of the results reported in this paper and the re-use and further development of the trackers for other researchers. The results demonstrate that ACF and YOLO trackers show more stability than the other trackers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6264009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62640092018-12-12 Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking Delforouzi, Ahmad Pamarthi, Bhargav Grzegorzek, Marcin Sensors (Basel) Article Object tracking in challenging videos is a hot topic in machine vision. Recently, novel training-based detectors, especially using the powerful deep learning schemes, have been proposed to detect objects in still images. However, there is still a semantic gap between the object detectors and higher level applications like object tracking in videos. This paper presents a comparative study of outstanding learning-based object detectors such as ACF, Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN), FastRCNN, FasterRCNN and You Only Look Once (YOLO) for object tracking. We use an online and offline training method for tracking. The online tracker trains the detectors with a generated synthetic set of images from the object of interest in the first frame. Then, the detectors detect the objects of interest in the next frames. The detector is updated online by using the detected objects from the last frames of the video. The offline tracker uses the detector for object detection in still images and then a tracker based on Kalman filter associates the objects among video frames. Our research is performed on a TLD dataset which contains challenging situations for tracking. Source codes and implementation details for the trackers are published to make both the reproduction of the results reported in this paper and the re-use and further development of the trackers for other researchers. The results demonstrate that ACF and YOLO trackers show more stability than the other trackers. MDPI 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6264009/ /pubmed/30453520 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Delforouzi, Ahmad
Pamarthi, Bhargav
Grzegorzek, Marcin
Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title_full Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title_fullStr Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title_full_unstemmed Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title_short Training-Based Methods for Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Visual Object Tracking
title_sort training-based methods for comparison of object detection methods for visual object tracking
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453520
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18113994
work_keys_str_mv AT delforouziahmad trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking
AT pamarthibhargav trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking
AT grzegorzekmarcin trainingbasedmethodsforcomparisonofobjectdetectionmethodsforvisualobjecttracking