Cargando…

Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration

BACKGROUND: Cell-based regenerative medicine therapies are now frequently tested in clinical trials. In many conditions, cell therapies are administered systemically, but there is little understanding of their fate, and adverse events are often under-reported. Currently, it is only possible to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scarfe, Lauren, Taylor, Arthur, Sharkey, Jack, Harwood, Rachel, Barrow, Michael, Comenge, Joan, Beeken, Lydia, Astley, Cai, Santeramo, Ilaria, Hutchinson, Claire, Ressel, Lorenzo, Smythe, Jon, Austin, Eric, Levy, Raphael, Rosseinsky, Matthew J., Adams, Dave J., Poptani, Harish, Park, Brian K., Murray, Patricia, Wilm, Bettina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1076-x
_version_ 1783375407509143552
author Scarfe, Lauren
Taylor, Arthur
Sharkey, Jack
Harwood, Rachel
Barrow, Michael
Comenge, Joan
Beeken, Lydia
Astley, Cai
Santeramo, Ilaria
Hutchinson, Claire
Ressel, Lorenzo
Smythe, Jon
Austin, Eric
Levy, Raphael
Rosseinsky, Matthew J.
Adams, Dave J.
Poptani, Harish
Park, Brian K.
Murray, Patricia
Wilm, Bettina
author_facet Scarfe, Lauren
Taylor, Arthur
Sharkey, Jack
Harwood, Rachel
Barrow, Michael
Comenge, Joan
Beeken, Lydia
Astley, Cai
Santeramo, Ilaria
Hutchinson, Claire
Ressel, Lorenzo
Smythe, Jon
Austin, Eric
Levy, Raphael
Rosseinsky, Matthew J.
Adams, Dave J.
Poptani, Harish
Park, Brian K.
Murray, Patricia
Wilm, Bettina
author_sort Scarfe, Lauren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell-based regenerative medicine therapies are now frequently tested in clinical trials. In many conditions, cell therapies are administered systemically, but there is little understanding of their fate, and adverse events are often under-reported. Currently, it is only possible to assess safety and fate of cell therapies in preclinical studies, specifically by monitoring animals longitudinally using multi-modal imaging approaches. Here, using a suite of in vivo imaging modalities to explore the fate of a range of human and murine cells, we investigate how route of administration, cell type and host immune status affect the fate of administered cells. METHODS: We applied a unique imaging platform combining bioluminescence, optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging modalities to assess the safety of different human and murine cell types by following their biodistribution and persistence in mice following administration into the venous or arterial system. RESULTS: Longitudinal imaging analyses (i) suggested that the intra-arterial route may be more hazardous than intravenous administration for certain cell types, (ii) revealed that the potential of a mouse mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) line to form tumours depended on administration route and mouse strain and (iii) indicated that clinically tested human umbilical cord (hUC)-derived MSCs can transiently and unexpectedly proliferate when administered intravenously to mice. CONCLUSIONS: In order to perform an adequate safety assessment of potential cell-based therapies, a thorough understanding of cell biodistribution and fate post administration is required. The non-invasive imaging platform used here can expose not only the general organ distribution of these therapies, but also a detailed view of their presence within different organs and, importantly, tumourigenic potential. Our observation that the hUC-MSCs but not the human bone marrow (hBM)-derived MSCs persisted for a period in some animals suggests that therapies with these cells should proceed with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-018-1076-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6264053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62640532018-12-05 Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration Scarfe, Lauren Taylor, Arthur Sharkey, Jack Harwood, Rachel Barrow, Michael Comenge, Joan Beeken, Lydia Astley, Cai Santeramo, Ilaria Hutchinson, Claire Ressel, Lorenzo Smythe, Jon Austin, Eric Levy, Raphael Rosseinsky, Matthew J. Adams, Dave J. Poptani, Harish Park, Brian K. Murray, Patricia Wilm, Bettina Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Cell-based regenerative medicine therapies are now frequently tested in clinical trials. In many conditions, cell therapies are administered systemically, but there is little understanding of their fate, and adverse events are often under-reported. Currently, it is only possible to assess safety and fate of cell therapies in preclinical studies, specifically by monitoring animals longitudinally using multi-modal imaging approaches. Here, using a suite of in vivo imaging modalities to explore the fate of a range of human and murine cells, we investigate how route of administration, cell type and host immune status affect the fate of administered cells. METHODS: We applied a unique imaging platform combining bioluminescence, optoacoustic and magnetic resonance imaging modalities to assess the safety of different human and murine cell types by following their biodistribution and persistence in mice following administration into the venous or arterial system. RESULTS: Longitudinal imaging analyses (i) suggested that the intra-arterial route may be more hazardous than intravenous administration for certain cell types, (ii) revealed that the potential of a mouse mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) line to form tumours depended on administration route and mouse strain and (iii) indicated that clinically tested human umbilical cord (hUC)-derived MSCs can transiently and unexpectedly proliferate when administered intravenously to mice. CONCLUSIONS: In order to perform an adequate safety assessment of potential cell-based therapies, a thorough understanding of cell biodistribution and fate post administration is required. The non-invasive imaging platform used here can expose not only the general organ distribution of these therapies, but also a detailed view of their presence within different organs and, importantly, tumourigenic potential. Our observation that the hUC-MSCs but not the human bone marrow (hBM)-derived MSCs persisted for a period in some animals suggests that therapies with these cells should proceed with caution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-018-1076-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6264053/ /pubmed/30486897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1076-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Scarfe, Lauren
Taylor, Arthur
Sharkey, Jack
Harwood, Rachel
Barrow, Michael
Comenge, Joan
Beeken, Lydia
Astley, Cai
Santeramo, Ilaria
Hutchinson, Claire
Ressel, Lorenzo
Smythe, Jon
Austin, Eric
Levy, Raphael
Rosseinsky, Matthew J.
Adams, Dave J.
Poptani, Harish
Park, Brian K.
Murray, Patricia
Wilm, Bettina
Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title_full Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title_fullStr Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title_short Non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
title_sort non-invasive imaging reveals conditions that impact distribution and persistence of cells after in vivo administration
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-1076-x
work_keys_str_mv AT scarfelauren noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT taylorarthur noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT sharkeyjack noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT harwoodrachel noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT barrowmichael noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT comengejoan noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT beekenlydia noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT astleycai noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT santeramoilaria noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT hutchinsonclaire noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT ressellorenzo noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT smythejon noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT austineric noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT levyraphael noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT rosseinskymatthewj noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT adamsdavej noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT poptaniharish noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT parkbriank noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT murraypatricia noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration
AT wilmbettina noninvasiveimagingrevealsconditionsthatimpactdistributionandpersistenceofcellsafterinvivoadministration