Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters
After 6 months of operation a long-term biofilter was stopped for two weeks and then it was started up again for a second experimental period of almost 1.3 years, with high toluene loads and submitted to several physical and chemical treatments in order to remove excess biomass that could affect the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16086927 |
_version_ | 1783375447755587584 |
---|---|
author | Flores-Valle, Sergio Odín Ríos-Bernÿ, Omar Chanona-Pérez, Jorge Fregoso-Aguilar, Tomas Morales-González, José A. Prado-Rubianes, Oscar Jesús Herrera-Bucio, Rafael López-Albarán, Pablo Morales-González, Ángel Garibay-Febles, Vicente Domínguez, Enrique Godínez Kennes, Christian Veiga-Barbazán, Ma. Carmen Mendoza-Pérez, Jorge Alberto |
author_facet | Flores-Valle, Sergio Odín Ríos-Bernÿ, Omar Chanona-Pérez, Jorge Fregoso-Aguilar, Tomas Morales-González, José A. Prado-Rubianes, Oscar Jesús Herrera-Bucio, Rafael López-Albarán, Pablo Morales-González, Ángel Garibay-Febles, Vicente Domínguez, Enrique Godínez Kennes, Christian Veiga-Barbazán, Ma. Carmen Mendoza-Pérez, Jorge Alberto |
author_sort | Flores-Valle, Sergio Odín |
collection | PubMed |
description | After 6 months of operation a long-term biofilter was stopped for two weeks and then it was started up again for a second experimental period of almost 1.3 years, with high toluene loads and submitted to several physical and chemical treatments in order to remove excess biomass that could affect the reactor’s performance due to clogging, whose main effect is a high pressure drop. Elimination capacity and removal efficiency were determined after each treatment. The methods applied were: filling with water and draining, backwashing, and air sparging. Different flows and temperatures (20, 30, 45 and 60 °C) were applied, either with distilled water or with different chemicals in aqueous solutions. Treatments with chemicals caused a decrease of the biofilter performance, requiring periods of 1 to 2 weeks to recover previous values. The results indicate that air sparging with pure distilled water as well as with solutions of NaOH (0.01% w/v) and NaOCl (0.01% w/v) were the treatments that removed more biomass, working either at 20, 30 or 45 °C and at relatively low flow rates (below 320 L h(−1)), but with a high biodegradation inhibition after the treatments. Dry biomass (g VS) content was determined at three different heights of the biofilter in order to carry out each experiment under the same conditions. The same amount of dry biomass when applying a treatment was established so it could be considered that the biofilm conditions were identical. Wet biomass was used as a control of the biofilter’s water content during treatments. Several batch assays were performed to support and quantify the observed inhibitory effects of the different chemicals and temperatures applied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6264225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62642252018-12-10 A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters Flores-Valle, Sergio Odín Ríos-Bernÿ, Omar Chanona-Pérez, Jorge Fregoso-Aguilar, Tomas Morales-González, José A. Prado-Rubianes, Oscar Jesús Herrera-Bucio, Rafael López-Albarán, Pablo Morales-González, Ángel Garibay-Febles, Vicente Domínguez, Enrique Godínez Kennes, Christian Veiga-Barbazán, Ma. Carmen Mendoza-Pérez, Jorge Alberto Molecules Article After 6 months of operation a long-term biofilter was stopped for two weeks and then it was started up again for a second experimental period of almost 1.3 years, with high toluene loads and submitted to several physical and chemical treatments in order to remove excess biomass that could affect the reactor’s performance due to clogging, whose main effect is a high pressure drop. Elimination capacity and removal efficiency were determined after each treatment. The methods applied were: filling with water and draining, backwashing, and air sparging. Different flows and temperatures (20, 30, 45 and 60 °C) were applied, either with distilled water or with different chemicals in aqueous solutions. Treatments with chemicals caused a decrease of the biofilter performance, requiring periods of 1 to 2 weeks to recover previous values. The results indicate that air sparging with pure distilled water as well as with solutions of NaOH (0.01% w/v) and NaOCl (0.01% w/v) were the treatments that removed more biomass, working either at 20, 30 or 45 °C and at relatively low flow rates (below 320 L h(−1)), but with a high biodegradation inhibition after the treatments. Dry biomass (g VS) content was determined at three different heights of the biofilter in order to carry out each experiment under the same conditions. The same amount of dry biomass when applying a treatment was established so it could be considered that the biofilm conditions were identical. Wet biomass was used as a control of the biofilter’s water content during treatments. Several batch assays were performed to support and quantify the observed inhibitory effects of the different chemicals and temperatures applied. MDPI 2011-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6264225/ /pubmed/21844842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16086927 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Flores-Valle, Sergio Odín Ríos-Bernÿ, Omar Chanona-Pérez, Jorge Fregoso-Aguilar, Tomas Morales-González, José A. Prado-Rubianes, Oscar Jesús Herrera-Bucio, Rafael López-Albarán, Pablo Morales-González, Ángel Garibay-Febles, Vicente Domínguez, Enrique Godínez Kennes, Christian Veiga-Barbazán, Ma. Carmen Mendoza-Pérez, Jorge Alberto A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title | A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Physical and Chemical Processes for Removal of Biomass in Biofilters |
title_sort | comparative study of physical and chemical processes for removal of biomass in biofilters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16086927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT floresvallesergioodin acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT riosbernyomar acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT chanonaperezjorge acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT fregosoaguilartomas acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT moralesgonzalezjosea acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT pradorubianesoscarjesus acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT herrerabuciorafael acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT lopezalbaranpablo acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT moralesgonzalezangel acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT garibayfeblesvicente acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT dominguezenriquegodinez acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT kenneschristian acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT veigabarbazanmacarmen acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT mendozaperezjorgealberto acomparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT floresvallesergioodin comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT riosbernyomar comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT chanonaperezjorge comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT fregosoaguilartomas comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT moralesgonzalezjosea comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT pradorubianesoscarjesus comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT herrerabuciorafael comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT lopezalbaranpablo comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT moralesgonzalezangel comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT garibayfeblesvicente comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT dominguezenriquegodinez comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT kenneschristian comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT veigabarbazanmacarmen comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters AT mendozaperezjorgealberto comparativestudyofphysicalandchemicalprocessesforremovalofbiomassinbiofilters |