Cargando…

Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study

The most common complication in cancer patients is catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), of which Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen. Although S. aureus CRBSI patients are recommended for prolonged intravenous therapy, this is often not feasible. We assessed the effectiveness of sw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itoh, Naoya, Hadano, Yoshiro, Saito, Sho, Myokai, Michiko, Nakamura, Yasunobu, Kurai, Hanako
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30496212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207413
_version_ 1783375504926048256
author Itoh, Naoya
Hadano, Yoshiro
Saito, Sho
Myokai, Michiko
Nakamura, Yasunobu
Kurai, Hanako
author_facet Itoh, Naoya
Hadano, Yoshiro
Saito, Sho
Myokai, Michiko
Nakamura, Yasunobu
Kurai, Hanako
author_sort Itoh, Naoya
collection PubMed
description The most common complication in cancer patients is catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), of which Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen. Although S. aureus CRBSI patients are recommended for prolonged intravenous therapy, this is often not feasible. We assessed the effectiveness of switching from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients with CRBSI due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). We conducted a retrospective observational study of 60 patients at one tertiary-care cancer center between April 2005 and March 2016. Patients who received effective intravenous (IV) antibiotics for at least 10 days (IV group) were compared to the IV group of patients who had switched to effective oral (PO) antibiotics after IV treatment for at least 10 days (IV + PO group). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 90 days. Univariate and propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses using variables likely to influence the outcomes were performed. Of the 60 patients, 32 (53.3%) and 28 (46.7%) were in the IV and IV + PO groups, respectively. The median antibiotic treatment durations in the IV and IV + PO groups were 17 (13–31) and 33 (26–52) days, respectively (p<0.001). The 90-day mortality in the IV and IV + PO groups were 53.1% (17/32) and 10.7% (3/28), respectively (p = 0.001). Univariate logistic regression model showed that the odds ratios of oral switch therapy for 90-day mortality was 0.106 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.027–0.423; p = 0.001). The propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression model estimated the odds ratios of oral switched therapy for 90-day mortality as 0.377 (95% CI: 0.037–3.884; p = 0.413). Our results suggest that oral switch therapy was not associated with mortality in cancer patients with CRBSI due to MSSA compared with no oral switch therapy. Oral switch therapy may be a reasonable option for patients with CRBSI due to MSSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6264473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62644732018-12-19 Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study Itoh, Naoya Hadano, Yoshiro Saito, Sho Myokai, Michiko Nakamura, Yasunobu Kurai, Hanako PLoS One Research Article The most common complication in cancer patients is catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), of which Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen. Although S. aureus CRBSI patients are recommended for prolonged intravenous therapy, this is often not feasible. We assessed the effectiveness of switching from intravenous to oral antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients with CRBSI due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). We conducted a retrospective observational study of 60 patients at one tertiary-care cancer center between April 2005 and March 2016. Patients who received effective intravenous (IV) antibiotics for at least 10 days (IV group) were compared to the IV group of patients who had switched to effective oral (PO) antibiotics after IV treatment for at least 10 days (IV + PO group). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 90 days. Univariate and propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses using variables likely to influence the outcomes were performed. Of the 60 patients, 32 (53.3%) and 28 (46.7%) were in the IV and IV + PO groups, respectively. The median antibiotic treatment durations in the IV and IV + PO groups were 17 (13–31) and 33 (26–52) days, respectively (p<0.001). The 90-day mortality in the IV and IV + PO groups were 53.1% (17/32) and 10.7% (3/28), respectively (p = 0.001). Univariate logistic regression model showed that the odds ratios of oral switch therapy for 90-day mortality was 0.106 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.027–0.423; p = 0.001). The propensity score-adjusted multivariate logistic regression model estimated the odds ratios of oral switched therapy for 90-day mortality as 0.377 (95% CI: 0.037–3.884; p = 0.413). Our results suggest that oral switch therapy was not associated with mortality in cancer patients with CRBSI due to MSSA compared with no oral switch therapy. Oral switch therapy may be a reasonable option for patients with CRBSI due to MSSA. Public Library of Science 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6264473/ /pubmed/30496212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207413 Text en © 2018 Itoh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Itoh, Naoya
Hadano, Yoshiro
Saito, Sho
Myokai, Michiko
Nakamura, Yasunobu
Kurai, Hanako
Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title_full Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title_short Intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A single-center retrospective observational study
title_sort intravenous to oral switch therapy in cancer patients with catheter-related bloodstream infection due to methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus: a single-center retrospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30496212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207413
work_keys_str_mv AT itohnaoya intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hadanoyoshiro intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT saitosho intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT myokaimichiko intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nakamurayasunobu intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kuraihanako intravenoustooralswitchtherapyincancerpatientswithcatheterrelatedbloodstreaminfectionduetomethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusasinglecenterretrospectiveobservationalstudy