Cargando…

Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil

Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhan, Taylor, Stephen E., Sharma, Prabhakar, Flury, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30496263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
_version_ 1783375586375237632
author Wang, Zhan
Taylor, Stephen E.
Sharma, Prabhakar
Flury, Markus
author_facet Wang, Zhan
Taylor, Stephen E.
Sharma, Prabhakar
Flury, Markus
author_sort Wang, Zhan
collection PubMed
description Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the extraction of nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. We spiked biosolids and soil samples with polystyrene nano- and microbeads (0.05, 1.0, 2.6, 4.8, and 100 μm diameter). Different extraction methods (w/ and w/o H(2)O(2) digestion) were tested, and plastic beads were separated from mineral particles by flotation in a ZnCl(2) solution. Plastic particles were quantified by UV-Vis spectrometry and gravimetrically. While large beads (100 μm) could be quantitatively extracted (∼100%) from both biosolids and soils, smaller beads had low extraction efficiencies (ranging from 5 to 80%, with an average of 20%). Except for the 100 μm beads, oxidation with H(2)O(2) negatively impacted the extraction efficiencies. For the soil, extraction with water only, followed by flotation in a ZnCl(2) solution, resulted in relatively high extraction efficiencies (>75%) for beads larger than 1 μm, but low efficiencies (<30%) for the 0.05 and 1.0 μm beads. Our results indicate that while flotation generally works to separate plastic nano- and microbeads in a solution, the challenge is to quantitatively extract nano- and microbeads from a biosolids or soil matrix. Samples high in organic matter content require removal of the organic matter, but the common method of H(2)O(2) oxidation leads to poor extraction efficiencies for nano- and microbeads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6264880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62648802018-12-19 Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil Wang, Zhan Taylor, Stephen E. Sharma, Prabhakar Flury, Markus PLoS One Research Article Extraction and quantification of nano- and microplastics from sediments and soils is challenging. Although no standard method has been established so far, flotation is commonly used to separate plastic from mineral material. The objective of this study was to test the efficiency of flotation for the extraction of nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil. We spiked biosolids and soil samples with polystyrene nano- and microbeads (0.05, 1.0, 2.6, 4.8, and 100 μm diameter). Different extraction methods (w/ and w/o H(2)O(2) digestion) were tested, and plastic beads were separated from mineral particles by flotation in a ZnCl(2) solution. Plastic particles were quantified by UV-Vis spectrometry and gravimetrically. While large beads (100 μm) could be quantitatively extracted (∼100%) from both biosolids and soils, smaller beads had low extraction efficiencies (ranging from 5 to 80%, with an average of 20%). Except for the 100 μm beads, oxidation with H(2)O(2) negatively impacted the extraction efficiencies. For the soil, extraction with water only, followed by flotation in a ZnCl(2) solution, resulted in relatively high extraction efficiencies (>75%) for beads larger than 1 μm, but low efficiencies (<30%) for the 0.05 and 1.0 μm beads. Our results indicate that while flotation generally works to separate plastic nano- and microbeads in a solution, the challenge is to quantitatively extract nano- and microbeads from a biosolids or soil matrix. Samples high in organic matter content require removal of the organic matter, but the common method of H(2)O(2) oxidation leads to poor extraction efficiencies for nano- and microbeads. Public Library of Science 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6264880/ /pubmed/30496263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009 Text en © 2018 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Zhan
Taylor, Stephen E.
Sharma, Prabhakar
Flury, Markus
Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title_full Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title_fullStr Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title_full_unstemmed Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title_short Poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
title_sort poor extraction efficiencies of polystyrene nano- and microplastics from biosolids and soil
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6264880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30496263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208009
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhan poorextractionefficienciesofpolystyrenenanoandmicroplasticsfrombiosolidsandsoil
AT taylorstephene poorextractionefficienciesofpolystyrenenanoandmicroplasticsfrombiosolidsandsoil
AT sharmaprabhakar poorextractionefficienciesofpolystyrenenanoandmicroplasticsfrombiosolidsandsoil
AT flurymarkus poorextractionefficienciesofpolystyrenenanoandmicroplasticsfrombiosolidsandsoil