Cargando…
The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% IC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1 |
_version_ | 1783375599918645248 |
---|---|
author | Bertucci, François Finetti, Pascal Simeone, Ines Hendrickx, Wouter Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Viens, Patrice Mamessier, Emilie Ceccarelli, Michele Birnbaum, Daniel Bedognetti, Davide |
author_facet | Bertucci, François Finetti, Pascal Simeone, Ines Hendrickx, Wouter Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Viens, Patrice Mamessier, Emilie Ceccarelli, Michele Birnbaum, Daniel Bedognetti, Davide |
author_sort | Bertucci, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% ICR2, 23% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. In univariate analysis, ICR4 was associated with a 36% reduction in risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR1-3 (p = 2.30E–03). In multivariate analysis including notably the three major prognostic signatures (Recurrence score, 70-gene signature, ROR-P), ICR was the strongest predictive variable (p = 9.80E–04). ICR showed no prognostic value in the HR+/HER2− subtype, but prognostic value in the HER2+ and TN subtypes. Furthermore, in each molecular subtype and among the tumours defined as high risk by the three prognostic signatures, ICR4 patients had a 41–75% reduction in risk of relapse as compared with ICR1-3 patients. ICR added significant prognostic information to that provided by the clinico-genomic models in the overall population and in each molecular subtype. ICR4 was independently associated with achievement of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 2.97E–04). CONCLUSION: ICR signature adds prognostic information to that of current proliferation-based signatures, with which it could be integrated to improve patients’ stratification and guide adjuvant treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6265245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62652452019-10-24 The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer Bertucci, François Finetti, Pascal Simeone, Ines Hendrickx, Wouter Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Viens, Patrice Mamessier, Emilie Ceccarelli, Michele Birnbaum, Daniel Bedognetti, Davide Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% ICR2, 23% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. In univariate analysis, ICR4 was associated with a 36% reduction in risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR1-3 (p = 2.30E–03). In multivariate analysis including notably the three major prognostic signatures (Recurrence score, 70-gene signature, ROR-P), ICR was the strongest predictive variable (p = 9.80E–04). ICR showed no prognostic value in the HR+/HER2− subtype, but prognostic value in the HER2+ and TN subtypes. Furthermore, in each molecular subtype and among the tumours defined as high risk by the three prognostic signatures, ICR4 patients had a 41–75% reduction in risk of relapse as compared with ICR1-3 patients. ICR added significant prognostic information to that provided by the clinico-genomic models in the overall population and in each molecular subtype. ICR4 was independently associated with achievement of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 2.97E–04). CONCLUSION: ICR signature adds prognostic information to that of current proliferation-based signatures, with which it could be integrated to improve patients’ stratification and guide adjuvant treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-24 2018-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6265245/ /pubmed/30353048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Article Bertucci, François Finetti, Pascal Simeone, Ines Hendrickx, Wouter Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Viens, Patrice Mamessier, Emilie Ceccarelli, Michele Birnbaum, Daniel Bedognetti, Davide The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title | The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title_full | The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title_fullStr | The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title_short | The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
title_sort | immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertuccifrancois theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT finettipascal theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT simeoneines theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT hendrickxwouter theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT wangena theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT marincolafrancescom theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT vienspatrice theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT mamessieremilie theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT ceccarellimichele theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT birnbaumdaniel theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT bedognettidavide theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT bertuccifrancois immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT finettipascal immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT simeoneines immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT hendrickxwouter immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT wangena immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT marincolafrancescom immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT vienspatrice immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT mamessieremilie immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT ceccarellimichele immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT birnbaumdaniel immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer AT bedognettidavide immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer |