Cargando…

The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% IC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertucci, François, Finetti, Pascal, Simeone, Ines, Hendrickx, Wouter, Wang, Ena, Marincola, Francesco M., Viens, Patrice, Mamessier, Emilie, Ceccarelli, Michele, Birnbaum, Daniel, Bedognetti, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1
_version_ 1783375599918645248
author Bertucci, François
Finetti, Pascal
Simeone, Ines
Hendrickx, Wouter
Wang, Ena
Marincola, Francesco M.
Viens, Patrice
Mamessier, Emilie
Ceccarelli, Michele
Birnbaum, Daniel
Bedognetti, Davide
author_facet Bertucci, François
Finetti, Pascal
Simeone, Ines
Hendrickx, Wouter
Wang, Ena
Marincola, Francesco M.
Viens, Patrice
Mamessier, Emilie
Ceccarelli, Michele
Birnbaum, Daniel
Bedognetti, Davide
author_sort Bertucci, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% ICR2, 23% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. In univariate analysis, ICR4 was associated with a 36% reduction in risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR1-3 (p = 2.30E–03). In multivariate analysis including notably the three major prognostic signatures (Recurrence score, 70-gene signature, ROR-P), ICR was the strongest predictive variable (p = 9.80E–04). ICR showed no prognostic value in the HR+/HER2− subtype, but prognostic value in the HER2+ and TN subtypes. Furthermore, in each molecular subtype and among the tumours defined as high risk by the three prognostic signatures, ICR4 patients had a 41–75% reduction in risk of relapse as compared with ICR1-3 patients. ICR added significant prognostic information to that provided by the clinico-genomic models in the overall population and in each molecular subtype. ICR4 was independently associated with achievement of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 2.97E–04). CONCLUSION: ICR signature adds prognostic information to that of current proliferation-based signatures, with which it could be integrated to improve patients’ stratification and guide adjuvant treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6265245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62652452019-10-24 The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer Bertucci, François Finetti, Pascal Simeone, Ines Hendrickx, Wouter Wang, Ena Marincola, Francesco M. Viens, Patrice Mamessier, Emilie Ceccarelli, Michele Birnbaum, Daniel Bedognetti, Davide Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The immunologic constant of rejection (ICR) is a broad phenomenon of Th-1 immunity-mediated, tissue-specific destruction. METHODS: We tested the prognostic value of a 20-gene ICR expression signature in 8766 early breast cancers. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of tumours were ICR1, 29% ICR2, 23% ICR3, and 15% ICR4. In univariate analysis, ICR4 was associated with a 36% reduction in risk of metastatic relapse when compared with ICR1-3 (p = 2.30E–03). In multivariate analysis including notably the three major prognostic signatures (Recurrence score, 70-gene signature, ROR-P), ICR was the strongest predictive variable (p = 9.80E–04). ICR showed no prognostic value in the HR+/HER2− subtype, but prognostic value in the HER2+ and TN subtypes. Furthermore, in each molecular subtype and among the tumours defined as high risk by the three prognostic signatures, ICR4 patients had a 41–75% reduction in risk of relapse as compared with ICR1-3 patients. ICR added significant prognostic information to that provided by the clinico-genomic models in the overall population and in each molecular subtype. ICR4 was independently associated with achievement of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 2.97E–04). CONCLUSION: ICR signature adds prognostic information to that of current proliferation-based signatures, with which it could be integrated to improve patients’ stratification and guide adjuvant treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-24 2018-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6265245/ /pubmed/30353048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
spellingShingle Article
Bertucci, François
Finetti, Pascal
Simeone, Ines
Hendrickx, Wouter
Wang, Ena
Marincola, Francesco M.
Viens, Patrice
Mamessier, Emilie
Ceccarelli, Michele
Birnbaum, Daniel
Bedognetti, Davide
The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title_full The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title_fullStr The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title_short The immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
title_sort immunologic constant of rejection classification refines the prognostic value of conventional prognostic signatures in breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0309-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bertuccifrancois theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT finettipascal theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT simeoneines theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT hendrickxwouter theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT wangena theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT marincolafrancescom theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT vienspatrice theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT mamessieremilie theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT ceccarellimichele theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT birnbaumdaniel theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT bedognettidavide theimmunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT bertuccifrancois immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT finettipascal immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT simeoneines immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT hendrickxwouter immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT wangena immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT marincolafrancescom immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT vienspatrice immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT mamessieremilie immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT ceccarellimichele immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT birnbaumdaniel immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer
AT bedognettidavide immunologicconstantofrejectionclassificationrefinestheprognosticvalueofconventionalprognosticsignaturesinbreastcancer