Cargando…

The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration

Tissue engineered cartilage substitutes, which induce the process of endochondral ossification, represent a regenerative strategy for bone defect healing. Such constructs typically consist of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) forming a cartilage template in vitro, which can be implanted t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longoni, A., Knežević, L., Schepers, K., Weinans, H., Rosenberg, A. J. W. P., Gawlitta, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-018-0060-5
_version_ 1783375606451273728
author Longoni, A.
Knežević, L.
Schepers, K.
Weinans, H.
Rosenberg, A. J. W. P.
Gawlitta, D.
author_facet Longoni, A.
Knežević, L.
Schepers, K.
Weinans, H.
Rosenberg, A. J. W. P.
Gawlitta, D.
author_sort Longoni, A.
collection PubMed
description Tissue engineered cartilage substitutes, which induce the process of endochondral ossification, represent a regenerative strategy for bone defect healing. Such constructs typically consist of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) forming a cartilage template in vitro, which can be implanted to stimulate bone formation in vivo. The use of MSCs of allogeneic origin could potentially improve the clinical utility of the tissue engineered cartilage constructs in three ways. First, ready-to-use construct availability can speed up the treatment process. Second, MSCs derived and expanded from a single donor could be applied to treat several patients and thus the costs of the medical interventions would decrease. Finally, it would allow more control over the quality of the MSC chondrogenic differentiation. However, even though the envisaged clinical use of allogeneic cell sources for bone regeneration is advantageous, their immunogenicity poses a significant obstacle to their clinical application. The aim of this review is to increase the awareness of the role played by immune cells during endochondral ossification, and in particular during regenerative strategies when the immune response is altered by the presence of implanted biomaterials and/or cells. More specifically, we focus on how this balance between immune response and bone regeneration is affected by the implantation of a cartilaginous tissue engineered construct of allogeneic origin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6265275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62652752018-12-03 The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration Longoni, A. Knežević, L. Schepers, K. Weinans, H. Rosenberg, A. J. W. P. Gawlitta, D. NPJ Regen Med Review Article Tissue engineered cartilage substitutes, which induce the process of endochondral ossification, represent a regenerative strategy for bone defect healing. Such constructs typically consist of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) forming a cartilage template in vitro, which can be implanted to stimulate bone formation in vivo. The use of MSCs of allogeneic origin could potentially improve the clinical utility of the tissue engineered cartilage constructs in three ways. First, ready-to-use construct availability can speed up the treatment process. Second, MSCs derived and expanded from a single donor could be applied to treat several patients and thus the costs of the medical interventions would decrease. Finally, it would allow more control over the quality of the MSC chondrogenic differentiation. However, even though the envisaged clinical use of allogeneic cell sources for bone regeneration is advantageous, their immunogenicity poses a significant obstacle to their clinical application. The aim of this review is to increase the awareness of the role played by immune cells during endochondral ossification, and in particular during regenerative strategies when the immune response is altered by the presence of implanted biomaterials and/or cells. More specifically, we focus on how this balance between immune response and bone regeneration is affected by the implantation of a cartilaginous tissue engineered construct of allogeneic origin. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6265275/ /pubmed/30510772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-018-0060-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Longoni, A.
Knežević, L.
Schepers, K.
Weinans, H.
Rosenberg, A. J. W. P.
Gawlitta, D.
The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title_full The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title_fullStr The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title_full_unstemmed The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title_short The impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
title_sort impact of immune response on endochondral bone regeneration
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-018-0060-5
work_keys_str_mv AT longonia theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT knezevicl theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT schepersk theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT weinansh theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT rosenbergajwp theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT gawlittad theimpactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT longonia impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT knezevicl impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT schepersk impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT weinansh impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT rosenbergajwp impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration
AT gawlittad impactofimmuneresponseonendochondralboneregeneration