Cargando…

Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling

Background: Nowadays there is a strong debate on the need to introduce mandatory nutritional information on alcoholic beverages labels, and particularly on wine, as a tool to promote more health-conscious drinking patterns in society. In 2018, the European alcoholic beverages industry presented a se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vecchio, Riccardo, Annunziata, Azzurra, Mariani, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10111667
_version_ 1783375672742248448
author Vecchio, Riccardo
Annunziata, Azzurra
Mariani, Angela
author_facet Vecchio, Riccardo
Annunziata, Azzurra
Mariani, Angela
author_sort Vecchio, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description Background: Nowadays there is a strong debate on the need to introduce mandatory nutritional information on alcoholic beverages labels, and particularly on wine, as a tool to promote more health-conscious drinking patterns in society. In 2018, the European alcoholic beverages industry presented a self-regulatory proposal, now under assessment by the European Commission. The most critical issue is how to convey nutritional information to consumers, as producers should decide to apply information on label or off-label. Method: The current study measured, through a non-hypothetical, incentive compatible artefactual field experiment, Italian wine consumers (N = 103) preferences for four different formats of wine nutritional labelling, namely: back label with the indication of kcal for glass of wine, with the nutritional panel referred to 100 mL, without nutritional information (but with a link to an external website) and with the indication of key nutrients for glass of wine. Results: Findings reveal that respondents preferred the nutritional panel on the back label, assigning the lowest preference to the less informative wine label (only with a website recall). Furthermore, results show a low level of respondents’ knowledge of wine nutritional properties. Conclusion: Findings, while limited in terms of sample representativeness, seem to support the European Consumer Organisation and the European Alcohol Policy Alliance objection to an off-line label and the advocacy for a traditional and complete on label nutritional information on wine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6265679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62656792018-12-06 Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling Vecchio, Riccardo Annunziata, Azzurra Mariani, Angela Nutrients Article Background: Nowadays there is a strong debate on the need to introduce mandatory nutritional information on alcoholic beverages labels, and particularly on wine, as a tool to promote more health-conscious drinking patterns in society. In 2018, the European alcoholic beverages industry presented a self-regulatory proposal, now under assessment by the European Commission. The most critical issue is how to convey nutritional information to consumers, as producers should decide to apply information on label or off-label. Method: The current study measured, through a non-hypothetical, incentive compatible artefactual field experiment, Italian wine consumers (N = 103) preferences for four different formats of wine nutritional labelling, namely: back label with the indication of kcal for glass of wine, with the nutritional panel referred to 100 mL, without nutritional information (but with a link to an external website) and with the indication of key nutrients for glass of wine. Results: Findings reveal that respondents preferred the nutritional panel on the back label, assigning the lowest preference to the less informative wine label (only with a website recall). Furthermore, results show a low level of respondents’ knowledge of wine nutritional properties. Conclusion: Findings, while limited in terms of sample representativeness, seem to support the European Consumer Organisation and the European Alcohol Policy Alliance objection to an off-line label and the advocacy for a traditional and complete on label nutritional information on wine. MDPI 2018-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6265679/ /pubmed/30400373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10111667 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vecchio, Riccardo
Annunziata, Azzurra
Mariani, Angela
Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title_full Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title_fullStr Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title_full_unstemmed Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title_short Is More Better? Insights on Consumers’ Preferences for Nutritional Information on Wine Labelling
title_sort is more better? insights on consumers’ preferences for nutritional information on wine labelling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6265679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10111667
work_keys_str_mv AT vecchioriccardo ismorebetterinsightsonconsumerspreferencesfornutritionalinformationonwinelabelling
AT annunziataazzurra ismorebetterinsightsonconsumerspreferencesfornutritionalinformationonwinelabelling
AT marianiangela ismorebetterinsightsonconsumerspreferencesfornutritionalinformationonwinelabelling