Cargando…

Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia

Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), commonly surgical masks but, also, industry-certified N95-style masks. However, there is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galea, Karen S., Covey, Judith, Mutia Timur, Sari, Horwell, Claire J., Nugroho, Fentiny, Mueller, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112359
_version_ 1783375777458290688
author Galea, Karen S.
Covey, Judith
Mutia Timur, Sari
Horwell, Claire J.
Nugroho, Fentiny
Mueller, William
author_facet Galea, Karen S.
Covey, Judith
Mutia Timur, Sari
Horwell, Claire J.
Nugroho, Fentiny
Mueller, William
author_sort Galea, Karen S.
collection PubMed
description Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), commonly surgical masks but, also, industry-certified N95-style masks. However, there is currently no evidence on how wearable they are within affected populations or how protective wearers perceive them being against volcanic ash (which will influence the likelihood of uptake of recommended interventions). Volunteers living near Mt. Sinabung, Sumatra, Indonesia, participated in a field wearability study, which included a high-efficiency mask certified to industry standards (N95-equiv.); a standard, pleated surgical mask (Surgical); a Basic flat-fold mask (Flat-fold), and the surgical mask plus a scarf tied over the top (Surgical Plus) to improve fit. These types of RP had all performed well during earlier laboratory filtration efficiency tests. The N95-equiv. mask had performed significantly better than the other RP in the subsequent total inward leakage volunteer trials, whilst the Flat-fold and Surgical masks performed poorly, letting in a third of PM(2.5) particles (data published elsewhere). Thirty volunteers wore each mask for a 15-min walk before being asked to rate the comfort, breathability and perceived protection and fit of each. After wearing all of the masks, volunteers compared and identified their preferred type of protection. The feedback received from the volunteers suggested that the Surgical Plus and N95-equiv. masks were rated as being significantly hotter and more humid than other masks. The Flat-fold was rated to have better breathability than the other masks. The N95-equiv. mask was ranked as providing the best level of effectiveness of the four masks tested. Ultimately, when asked which type of mask they would choose to wear during ashfall, 33% selected the Flat-fold mask due to its comfort and simplicity, with the Surgical Plus being the least likely to be chosen of the four tested. The study findings are of benefit to agencies who need to make informed decisions on the procurement and distribution of RP for use by those affected in future eruptions and the provision of advice to communities on their usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6266167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62661672018-12-15 Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia Galea, Karen S. Covey, Judith Mutia Timur, Sari Horwell, Claire J. Nugroho, Fentiny Mueller, William Int J Environ Res Public Health Communication Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), commonly surgical masks but, also, industry-certified N95-style masks. However, there is currently no evidence on how wearable they are within affected populations or how protective wearers perceive them being against volcanic ash (which will influence the likelihood of uptake of recommended interventions). Volunteers living near Mt. Sinabung, Sumatra, Indonesia, participated in a field wearability study, which included a high-efficiency mask certified to industry standards (N95-equiv.); a standard, pleated surgical mask (Surgical); a Basic flat-fold mask (Flat-fold), and the surgical mask plus a scarf tied over the top (Surgical Plus) to improve fit. These types of RP had all performed well during earlier laboratory filtration efficiency tests. The N95-equiv. mask had performed significantly better than the other RP in the subsequent total inward leakage volunteer trials, whilst the Flat-fold and Surgical masks performed poorly, letting in a third of PM(2.5) particles (data published elsewhere). Thirty volunteers wore each mask for a 15-min walk before being asked to rate the comfort, breathability and perceived protection and fit of each. After wearing all of the masks, volunteers compared and identified their preferred type of protection. The feedback received from the volunteers suggested that the Surgical Plus and N95-equiv. masks were rated as being significantly hotter and more humid than other masks. The Flat-fold was rated to have better breathability than the other masks. The N95-equiv. mask was ranked as providing the best level of effectiveness of the four masks tested. Ultimately, when asked which type of mask they would choose to wear during ashfall, 33% selected the Flat-fold mask due to its comfort and simplicity, with the Surgical Plus being the least likely to be chosen of the four tested. The study findings are of benefit to agencies who need to make informed decisions on the procurement and distribution of RP for use by those affected in future eruptions and the provision of advice to communities on their usage. MDPI 2018-10-25 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6266167/ /pubmed/30366426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112359 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Galea, Karen S.
Covey, Judith
Mutia Timur, Sari
Horwell, Claire J.
Nugroho, Fentiny
Mueller, William
Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title_full Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title_fullStr Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title_short Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia
title_sort short communication: health interventions in volcanic eruptions—community wearability assessment of respiratory protection against volcanic ash from mt sinabung, indonesia
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112359
work_keys_str_mv AT galeakarens shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia
AT coveyjudith shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia
AT mutiatimursari shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia
AT horwellclairej shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia
AT nugrohofentiny shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia
AT muellerwilliam shortcommunicationhealthinterventionsinvolcaniceruptionscommunitywearabilityassessmentofrespiratoryprotectionagainstvolcanicashfrommtsinabungindonesia