Cargando…

The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis

AIMS: The Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) consists of 8 subscales measuring different aspects of eating behavior and is a widely used instrument in pediatric settings, both in relation to eating disorders and overweight/obesity. However, despite its widespread usage, research results have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Njardvik, Urdur, Klar, Elin Kristin, Thorsdottir, Fanney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.28
_version_ 1783375820608241664
author Njardvik, Urdur
Klar, Elin Kristin
Thorsdottir, Fanney
author_facet Njardvik, Urdur
Klar, Elin Kristin
Thorsdottir, Fanney
author_sort Njardvik, Urdur
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) consists of 8 subscales measuring different aspects of eating behavior and is a widely used instrument in pediatric settings, both in relation to eating disorders and overweight/obesity. However, despite its widespread usage, research results have, to this date, been inconsistent in regard to the factor structure of the CEBQ, with several factorial models suggested. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the 4 factor structures commonly reported in the literature on the 35‐item CEBQ, using confirmatory factor analysis in the same sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, parents of 560 children aged 5 to 12 years old completed the CEBQ; 70 questionnaires were incomplete, resulting in a final sample of 490. Confirmatory factor analyses tested the 4 competing models: a 6‐factor model, 2 seven‐factor models, and an 8‐factor model. The 8‐factor model provided an acceptable fit to the data and turned out to be the best fitting model. Correlation coefficients between the 8 factors never exceeded r = .77, supporting the construct uniqueness of the 8 subscales. Results also indicated that the CEBQ subscales have good factorial validity and internal reliability (α ≥ .75). CONCLUSION: In summary, this study of Icelandic children supports the appropriateness of using the CEBQ as a measure of 8 distinct dimensions of eating behavior style in school‐aged children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6266355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62663552019-01-08 The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis Njardvik, Urdur Klar, Elin Kristin Thorsdottir, Fanney Health Sci Rep Research Articles AIMS: The Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) consists of 8 subscales measuring different aspects of eating behavior and is a widely used instrument in pediatric settings, both in relation to eating disorders and overweight/obesity. However, despite its widespread usage, research results have, to this date, been inconsistent in regard to the factor structure of the CEBQ, with several factorial models suggested. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the 4 factor structures commonly reported in the literature on the 35‐item CEBQ, using confirmatory factor analysis in the same sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, parents of 560 children aged 5 to 12 years old completed the CEBQ; 70 questionnaires were incomplete, resulting in a final sample of 490. Confirmatory factor analyses tested the 4 competing models: a 6‐factor model, 2 seven‐factor models, and an 8‐factor model. The 8‐factor model provided an acceptable fit to the data and turned out to be the best fitting model. Correlation coefficients between the 8 factors never exceeded r = .77, supporting the construct uniqueness of the 8 subscales. Results also indicated that the CEBQ subscales have good factorial validity and internal reliability (α ≥ .75). CONCLUSION: In summary, this study of Icelandic children supports the appropriateness of using the CEBQ as a measure of 8 distinct dimensions of eating behavior style in school‐aged children. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6266355/ /pubmed/30623064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.28 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Njardvik, Urdur
Klar, Elin Kristin
Thorsdottir, Fanney
The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title_full The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title_fullStr The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title_full_unstemmed The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title_short The factor structure of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: A comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
title_sort factor structure of the children's eating behaviour questionnaire: a comparison of four models using confirmatory factor analysis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.28
work_keys_str_mv AT njardvikurdur thefactorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT klarelinkristin thefactorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT thorsdottirfanney thefactorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT njardvikurdur factorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT klarelinkristin factorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis
AT thorsdottirfanney factorstructureofthechildrenseatingbehaviourquestionnaireacomparisonoffourmodelsusingconfirmatoryfactoranalysis