Cargando…
Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HIV‐1 RNA viral load (VL) in plasma samples of HIV‐1–positive patients is used to assess the level of viral replication, the risk of disease progression, and the response and efficacy to antiretroviral treatment. Knowing the performance of different tests for HIV‐1 RNA detection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.31 |
_version_ | 1783375870415601664 |
---|---|
author | Longo, Serena Bon, Isabella Musumeci, Giuseppina Bertoldi, Alessia D'Urbano, Vanessa Calza, Leonardo Re, Maria Carla |
author_facet | Longo, Serena Bon, Isabella Musumeci, Giuseppina Bertoldi, Alessia D'Urbano, Vanessa Calza, Leonardo Re, Maria Carla |
author_sort | Longo, Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HIV‐1 RNA viral load (VL) in plasma samples of HIV‐1–positive patients is used to assess the level of viral replication, the risk of disease progression, and the response and efficacy to antiretroviral treatment. Knowing the performance of different tests for HIV‐1 RNA detection is, therefore, important for clinical care. This study compared the performance of the recently introduced Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay (Hologic, Inc) and the standard COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test (CAP/CTM2) (Roche Molecular System, Inc) for HIV‐1 RNA quantitation. METHODS: Assay performance was assessed using 335 clinical samples, a standard HIV‐1 low VL panel, and 2 diluted samples from well‐characterized patients infected with different HIV‐1 subtypes tested in 5 replicates over 3 days. All samples were tested on both assays to evaluate inter‐assay agreement, both qualitatively and quantitively. Altogether, we evaluated assay sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, repeatability, and reproducibility. RESULTS: Assay agreement for qualitative results in 335 clinical samples was fair (80.6%). Correlation of quantitative assay results (n = 164) was excellent (R (2) = 0.97), with 96.3% of the results within the 95% limit of assay agreement (−0.42 to +0.86 log), and 98.8% within 1 log of each other. Aptima‐HIV‐1 yielded results, on average, 0.22 log higher than CAP/CTM2. Both assays accurately quantitated the HIV‐1 standard at low VL (R (2) ≥ 0.94), with all samples within 0.5 log of the target. CONCLUSION: Aptima‐HIV‐1 assay demonstrated sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility, and precision for the detection and quantitation of HIV‐1 RNA across a wide dynamic range of VLs. Its performance, together with full automation and high throughput, suggests that Aptima‐HIV‐1 could be a suitable assay for reliable monitoring of HIV‐1 VL in patients undergoing treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6266574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62665742019-01-08 Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients Longo, Serena Bon, Isabella Musumeci, Giuseppina Bertoldi, Alessia D'Urbano, Vanessa Calza, Leonardo Re, Maria Carla Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HIV‐1 RNA viral load (VL) in plasma samples of HIV‐1–positive patients is used to assess the level of viral replication, the risk of disease progression, and the response and efficacy to antiretroviral treatment. Knowing the performance of different tests for HIV‐1 RNA detection is, therefore, important for clinical care. This study compared the performance of the recently introduced Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay (Hologic, Inc) and the standard COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test (CAP/CTM2) (Roche Molecular System, Inc) for HIV‐1 RNA quantitation. METHODS: Assay performance was assessed using 335 clinical samples, a standard HIV‐1 low VL panel, and 2 diluted samples from well‐characterized patients infected with different HIV‐1 subtypes tested in 5 replicates over 3 days. All samples were tested on both assays to evaluate inter‐assay agreement, both qualitatively and quantitively. Altogether, we evaluated assay sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, repeatability, and reproducibility. RESULTS: Assay agreement for qualitative results in 335 clinical samples was fair (80.6%). Correlation of quantitative assay results (n = 164) was excellent (R (2) = 0.97), with 96.3% of the results within the 95% limit of assay agreement (−0.42 to +0.86 log), and 98.8% within 1 log of each other. Aptima‐HIV‐1 yielded results, on average, 0.22 log higher than CAP/CTM2. Both assays accurately quantitated the HIV‐1 standard at low VL (R (2) ≥ 0.94), with all samples within 0.5 log of the target. CONCLUSION: Aptima‐HIV‐1 assay demonstrated sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility, and precision for the detection and quantitation of HIV‐1 RNA across a wide dynamic range of VLs. Its performance, together with full automation and high throughput, suggests that Aptima‐HIV‐1 could be a suitable assay for reliable monitoring of HIV‐1 VL in patients undergoing treatment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6266574/ /pubmed/30623066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.31 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Longo, Serena Bon, Isabella Musumeci, Giuseppina Bertoldi, Alessia D'Urbano, Vanessa Calza, Leonardo Re, Maria Carla Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title | Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title_full | Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title_short | Comparison of the Aptima HIV‐1 Quant Dx assay with the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV‐1 v2.0 Test for HIV‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from HIV‐1–infected patients |
title_sort | comparison of the aptima hiv‐1 quant dx assay with the cobas ampliprep/cobas taqman hiv‐1 v2.0 test for hiv‐1 viral load quantification in plasma samples from hiv‐1–infected patients |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30623066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longoserena comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT bonisabella comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT musumecigiuseppina comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT bertoldialessia comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT durbanovanessa comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT calzaleonardo comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients AT remariacarla comparisonoftheaptimahiv1quantdxassaywiththecobasampliprepcobastaqmanhiv1v20testforhiv1viralloadquantificationinplasmasamplesfromhiv1infectedpatients |