Cargando…
Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30469325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597 |
_version_ | 1783375896660410368 |
---|---|
author | Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. Henry, Rebekah Coulthard, Rebecca Schang, Christelle Williamson, Richard Coleman, Rhys Rooney, Graham Deletic, Ana McCarthy, David |
author_facet | Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. Henry, Rebekah Coulthard, Rebecca Schang, Christelle Williamson, Richard Coleman, Rhys Rooney, Graham Deletic, Ana McCarthy, David |
author_sort | Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks in estuaries. In this study, simultaneous survival of Escherichia coli and a fecal pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, was studied for 21 days in estuarine bank sediment microcosms. Observed growth patterns for both organisms were comparable under four simulated scenarios; for continuous-desiccation, extended-desiccation, periodic-inundation, and continuous-inundation systems, logarithmic decay coefficients were 1.54/day, 1.51/day, 0.14/day, and 0.20/day, respectively, for E. coli, and 1.72/day, 1.64/day, 0.21/day, and 0.24/day for S. Typhimurium. Re-wetting of continuous-desiccated systems resulted in potential re-growth, suggesting survival under moisture-limited conditions. Key findings from this study include: (i) Bank sediments can potentially support human pathogens (S. Typhimurium), (ii) inundation levels influence the survival of fecal bacteria in estuarine bank sediments, and (iii) comparable survival rates of S. Typhimurium and E. coli implies the latter could be a reliable fecal indicator in urban estuaries. The results from this study will help select suitable monitoring and management strategies for safer recreational activities in urban estuaries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6266694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62666942018-12-15 Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. Henry, Rebekah Coulthard, Rebecca Schang, Christelle Williamson, Richard Coleman, Rhys Rooney, Graham Deletic, Ana McCarthy, David Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks in estuaries. In this study, simultaneous survival of Escherichia coli and a fecal pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, was studied for 21 days in estuarine bank sediment microcosms. Observed growth patterns for both organisms were comparable under four simulated scenarios; for continuous-desiccation, extended-desiccation, periodic-inundation, and continuous-inundation systems, logarithmic decay coefficients were 1.54/day, 1.51/day, 0.14/day, and 0.20/day, respectively, for E. coli, and 1.72/day, 1.64/day, 0.21/day, and 0.24/day for S. Typhimurium. Re-wetting of continuous-desiccated systems resulted in potential re-growth, suggesting survival under moisture-limited conditions. Key findings from this study include: (i) Bank sediments can potentially support human pathogens (S. Typhimurium), (ii) inundation levels influence the survival of fecal bacteria in estuarine bank sediments, and (iii) comparable survival rates of S. Typhimurium and E. coli implies the latter could be a reliable fecal indicator in urban estuaries. The results from this study will help select suitable monitoring and management strategies for safer recreational activities in urban estuaries. MDPI 2018-11-21 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6266694/ /pubmed/30469325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. Henry, Rebekah Coulthard, Rebecca Schang, Christelle Williamson, Richard Coleman, Rhys Rooney, Graham Deletic, Ana McCarthy, David Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title | Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title_full | Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title_fullStr | Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title_full_unstemmed | Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title_short | Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments |
title_sort | salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and escherichia coli survival in estuarine bank sediments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30469325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siddiqeemahbubulh salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT henryrebekah salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT coulthardrebecca salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT schangchristelle salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT williamsonrichard salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT colemanrhys salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT rooneygraham salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT deleticana salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments AT mccarthydavid salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments |