Cargando…

Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments

Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siddiqee, Mahbubul H., Henry, Rebekah, Coulthard, Rebecca, Schang, Christelle, Williamson, Richard, Coleman, Rhys, Rooney, Graham, Deletic, Ana, McCarthy, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30469325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597
_version_ 1783375896660410368
author Siddiqee, Mahbubul H.
Henry, Rebekah
Coulthard, Rebecca
Schang, Christelle
Williamson, Richard
Coleman, Rhys
Rooney, Graham
Deletic, Ana
McCarthy, David
author_facet Siddiqee, Mahbubul H.
Henry, Rebekah
Coulthard, Rebecca
Schang, Christelle
Williamson, Richard
Coleman, Rhys
Rooney, Graham
Deletic, Ana
McCarthy, David
author_sort Siddiqee, Mahbubul H.
collection PubMed
description Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks in estuaries. In this study, simultaneous survival of Escherichia coli and a fecal pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, was studied for 21 days in estuarine bank sediment microcosms. Observed growth patterns for both organisms were comparable under four simulated scenarios; for continuous-desiccation, extended-desiccation, periodic-inundation, and continuous-inundation systems, logarithmic decay coefficients were 1.54/day, 1.51/day, 0.14/day, and 0.20/day, respectively, for E. coli, and 1.72/day, 1.64/day, 0.21/day, and 0.24/day for S. Typhimurium. Re-wetting of continuous-desiccated systems resulted in potential re-growth, suggesting survival under moisture-limited conditions. Key findings from this study include: (i) Bank sediments can potentially support human pathogens (S. Typhimurium), (ii) inundation levels influence the survival of fecal bacteria in estuarine bank sediments, and (iii) comparable survival rates of S. Typhimurium and E. coli implies the latter could be a reliable fecal indicator in urban estuaries. The results from this study will help select suitable monitoring and management strategies for safer recreational activities in urban estuaries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6266694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62666942018-12-15 Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments Siddiqee, Mahbubul H. Henry, Rebekah Coulthard, Rebecca Schang, Christelle Williamson, Richard Coleman, Rhys Rooney, Graham Deletic, Ana McCarthy, David Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Estuarine bank sediments have the potential to support the survival and growth of fecal indicator organisms, including Escherichia coli. However, survival of fecal pathogens in estuarine sediments is not well researched and therefore remains a significant knowledge gap regarding public health risks in estuaries. In this study, simultaneous survival of Escherichia coli and a fecal pathogen, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, was studied for 21 days in estuarine bank sediment microcosms. Observed growth patterns for both organisms were comparable under four simulated scenarios; for continuous-desiccation, extended-desiccation, periodic-inundation, and continuous-inundation systems, logarithmic decay coefficients were 1.54/day, 1.51/day, 0.14/day, and 0.20/day, respectively, for E. coli, and 1.72/day, 1.64/day, 0.21/day, and 0.24/day for S. Typhimurium. Re-wetting of continuous-desiccated systems resulted in potential re-growth, suggesting survival under moisture-limited conditions. Key findings from this study include: (i) Bank sediments can potentially support human pathogens (S. Typhimurium), (ii) inundation levels influence the survival of fecal bacteria in estuarine bank sediments, and (iii) comparable survival rates of S. Typhimurium and E. coli implies the latter could be a reliable fecal indicator in urban estuaries. The results from this study will help select suitable monitoring and management strategies for safer recreational activities in urban estuaries. MDPI 2018-11-21 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6266694/ /pubmed/30469325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Siddiqee, Mahbubul H.
Henry, Rebekah
Coulthard, Rebecca
Schang, Christelle
Williamson, Richard
Coleman, Rhys
Rooney, Graham
Deletic, Ana
McCarthy, David
Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title_full Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title_fullStr Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title_full_unstemmed Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title_short Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli Survival in Estuarine Bank Sediments
title_sort salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and escherichia coli survival in estuarine bank sediments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30469325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112597
work_keys_str_mv AT siddiqeemahbubulh salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT henryrebekah salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT coulthardrebecca salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT schangchristelle salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT williamsonrichard salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT colemanrhys salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT rooneygraham salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT deleticana salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments
AT mccarthydavid salmonellaentericaserovartyphimuriumandescherichiacolisurvivalinestuarinebanksediments