Cargando…

Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment

The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espinoza, Carolina, Feliú, Daniel, Aguilar, Claudio, Espinoza-González, Rodrigo, Lund, Fernando, Salinas, Vicente, Mujica, Nicolás
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217
_version_ 1783375915568332800
author Espinoza, Carolina
Feliú, Daniel
Aguilar, Claudio
Espinoza-González, Rodrigo
Lund, Fernando
Salinas, Vicente
Mujica, Nicolás
author_facet Espinoza, Carolina
Feliú, Daniel
Aguilar, Claudio
Espinoza-González, Rodrigo
Lund, Fernando
Salinas, Vicente
Mujica, Nicolás
author_sort Espinoza, Carolina
collection PubMed
description The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. The RUS results are compared with Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS) as well as Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) measurements. NRUS has a higher sensitivity by a factor of two to six and SHG by 14–62%. The latter technique is, however, faster and simpler. As a main result, we obtain a quantitative relation between the changes in the nonlinear parameters and the dislocation density variations, which in a first approximation is a linear relation between these differences. We also present a simple theoretical expression that explains the better sensitivity to dislocation content of the nonlinear parameters with respect to the linear ones. X-Ray diffraction measurements, although intrusive and less accurate, support the acoustics results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6266772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62667722018-12-17 Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment Espinoza, Carolina Feliú, Daniel Aguilar, Claudio Espinoza-González, Rodrigo Lund, Fernando Salinas, Vicente Mujica, Nicolás Materials (Basel) Article The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. The RUS results are compared with Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS) as well as Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) measurements. NRUS has a higher sensitivity by a factor of two to six and SHG by 14–62%. The latter technique is, however, faster and simpler. As a main result, we obtain a quantitative relation between the changes in the nonlinear parameters and the dislocation density variations, which in a first approximation is a linear relation between these differences. We also present a simple theoretical expression that explains the better sensitivity to dislocation content of the nonlinear parameters with respect to the linear ones. X-Ray diffraction measurements, although intrusive and less accurate, support the acoustics results. MDPI 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6266772/ /pubmed/30413073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Espinoza, Carolina
Feliú, Daniel
Aguilar, Claudio
Espinoza-González, Rodrigo
Lund, Fernando
Salinas, Vicente
Mujica, Nicolás
Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title_full Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title_fullStr Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title_short Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
title_sort linear versus nonlinear acoustic probing of plasticity in metals: a quantitative assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217
work_keys_str_mv AT espinozacarolina linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT feliudaniel linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT aguilarclaudio linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT espinozagonzalezrodrigo linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT lundfernando linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT salinasvicente linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment
AT mujicanicolas linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment