Cargando…
Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment
The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217 |
_version_ | 1783375915568332800 |
---|---|
author | Espinoza, Carolina Feliú, Daniel Aguilar, Claudio Espinoza-González, Rodrigo Lund, Fernando Salinas, Vicente Mujica, Nicolás |
author_facet | Espinoza, Carolina Feliú, Daniel Aguilar, Claudio Espinoza-González, Rodrigo Lund, Fernando Salinas, Vicente Mujica, Nicolás |
author_sort | Espinoza, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. The RUS results are compared with Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS) as well as Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) measurements. NRUS has a higher sensitivity by a factor of two to six and SHG by 14–62%. The latter technique is, however, faster and simpler. As a main result, we obtain a quantitative relation between the changes in the nonlinear parameters and the dislocation density variations, which in a first approximation is a linear relation between these differences. We also present a simple theoretical expression that explains the better sensitivity to dislocation content of the nonlinear parameters with respect to the linear ones. X-Ray diffraction measurements, although intrusive and less accurate, support the acoustics results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6266772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62667722018-12-17 Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment Espinoza, Carolina Feliú, Daniel Aguilar, Claudio Espinoza-González, Rodrigo Lund, Fernando Salinas, Vicente Mujica, Nicolás Materials (Basel) Article The relative dislocation density of aluminum and copper samples is quantitatively measured using linear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (RUS). For each metallic group, four samples were prepared with different thermomechanical treatments in order to induce changes in their dislocation densities. The RUS results are compared with Nonlinear Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy (NRUS) as well as Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) measurements. NRUS has a higher sensitivity by a factor of two to six and SHG by 14–62%. The latter technique is, however, faster and simpler. As a main result, we obtain a quantitative relation between the changes in the nonlinear parameters and the dislocation density variations, which in a first approximation is a linear relation between these differences. We also present a simple theoretical expression that explains the better sensitivity to dislocation content of the nonlinear parameters with respect to the linear ones. X-Ray diffraction measurements, although intrusive and less accurate, support the acoustics results. MDPI 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6266772/ /pubmed/30413073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Espinoza, Carolina Feliú, Daniel Aguilar, Claudio Espinoza-González, Rodrigo Lund, Fernando Salinas, Vicente Mujica, Nicolás Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title | Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title_full | Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title_fullStr | Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title_short | Linear Versus Nonlinear Acoustic Probing of Plasticity in Metals: A Quantitative Assessment |
title_sort | linear versus nonlinear acoustic probing of plasticity in metals: a quantitative assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6266772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11112217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espinozacarolina linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT feliudaniel linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT aguilarclaudio linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT espinozagonzalezrodrigo linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT lundfernando linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT salinasvicente linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment AT mujicanicolas linearversusnonlinearacousticprobingofplasticityinmetalsaquantitativeassessment |