Cargando…

Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis

BACKGROUND: Proteomics is an emerging field in the study of joint disease. Our two aims with this pilot analysis were to compare healthy human knee articular cartilage with meniscus, two tissues both known to become affected in the osteoarthritic disease process, and to compare two mass spectrometry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Folkesson, Elin, Turkiewicz, Aleksandra, Englund, Martin, Önnerfjord, Patrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2346-6
_version_ 1783375978251157504
author Folkesson, Elin
Turkiewicz, Aleksandra
Englund, Martin
Önnerfjord, Patrik
author_facet Folkesson, Elin
Turkiewicz, Aleksandra
Englund, Martin
Önnerfjord, Patrik
author_sort Folkesson, Elin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proteomics is an emerging field in the study of joint disease. Our two aims with this pilot analysis were to compare healthy human knee articular cartilage with meniscus, two tissues both known to become affected in the osteoarthritic disease process, and to compare two mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods: data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA). METHODS: Healthy knee articular cartilage taken from the medial tibial condyle and medial meniscus samples taken from the body region were obtained from three adult forensic medicine cases. Proteins were extracted from tissue pieces and prepared for MS analysis. Each sample was subjected to liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, and run in both DDA and DIA mode. Linear mixed effects models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 653 proteins were identified in the DDA analysis, of which the majority was present in both tissue types. Only proteins with quantitation information in both tissues (n = 90) were selected for more detailed analysis, of which the majority did not statistically significantly differ in abundance between the two tissue types, in either of the MS analyses. However, 21 proteins were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) between meniscus and cartilage in the DIA analysis. Out of these, 11 proteins were also significantly different in the DDA analysis. Aggrecan core protein was the most abundant protein in articular cartilage and significantly differed between the two tissues in both methods. The corresponding protein in meniscus was serum albumin. Dermatopontin exhibited the highest meniscus vs articular cartilage ratio among the statistically significant proteins. The DIA method led to narrower confidence intervals for the abundance differences between the two tissue types than DDA. CONCLUSIONS: Although articular cartilage and meniscus had similar proteomic composition, we detected several differences by MS. Between the two analyses, DIA yielded more precise estimates and more statistically significant different proteins than DDA, and had no missing values, which makes it preferable for future LC-MS/MS analyses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2346-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6267052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62670522018-12-05 Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis Folkesson, Elin Turkiewicz, Aleksandra Englund, Martin Önnerfjord, Patrik BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Proteomics is an emerging field in the study of joint disease. Our two aims with this pilot analysis were to compare healthy human knee articular cartilage with meniscus, two tissues both known to become affected in the osteoarthritic disease process, and to compare two mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods: data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA). METHODS: Healthy knee articular cartilage taken from the medial tibial condyle and medial meniscus samples taken from the body region were obtained from three adult forensic medicine cases. Proteins were extracted from tissue pieces and prepared for MS analysis. Each sample was subjected to liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, and run in both DDA and DIA mode. Linear mixed effects models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 653 proteins were identified in the DDA analysis, of which the majority was present in both tissue types. Only proteins with quantitation information in both tissues (n = 90) were selected for more detailed analysis, of which the majority did not statistically significantly differ in abundance between the two tissue types, in either of the MS analyses. However, 21 proteins were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05) between meniscus and cartilage in the DIA analysis. Out of these, 11 proteins were also significantly different in the DDA analysis. Aggrecan core protein was the most abundant protein in articular cartilage and significantly differed between the two tissues in both methods. The corresponding protein in meniscus was serum albumin. Dermatopontin exhibited the highest meniscus vs articular cartilage ratio among the statistically significant proteins. The DIA method led to narrower confidence intervals for the abundance differences between the two tissue types than DDA. CONCLUSIONS: Although articular cartilage and meniscus had similar proteomic composition, we detected several differences by MS. Between the two analyses, DIA yielded more precise estimates and more statistically significant different proteins than DDA, and had no missing values, which makes it preferable for future LC-MS/MS analyses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-018-2346-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6267052/ /pubmed/30497455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2346-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Folkesson, Elin
Turkiewicz, Aleksandra
Englund, Martin
Önnerfjord, Patrik
Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title_full Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title_fullStr Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title_short Differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
title_sort differential protein expression in human knee articular cartilage and medial meniscus using two different proteomic methods: a pilot analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2346-6
work_keys_str_mv AT folkessonelin differentialproteinexpressioninhumankneearticularcartilageandmedialmeniscususingtwodifferentproteomicmethodsapilotanalysis
AT turkiewiczaleksandra differentialproteinexpressioninhumankneearticularcartilageandmedialmeniscususingtwodifferentproteomicmethodsapilotanalysis
AT englundmartin differentialproteinexpressioninhumankneearticularcartilageandmedialmeniscususingtwodifferentproteomicmethodsapilotanalysis
AT onnerfjordpatrik differentialproteinexpressioninhumankneearticularcartilageandmedialmeniscususingtwodifferentproteomicmethodsapilotanalysis