Cargando…

Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study

To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kominiarek, Michelle A., Vyhmeister, Heidi, Balmert, Lauren C., Fairchild, Paige, Tolo, Hallie, Grobman, William, Simon, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0021
_version_ 1783376032827441152
author Kominiarek, Michelle A.
Vyhmeister, Heidi
Balmert, Lauren C.
Fairchild, Paige
Tolo, Hallie
Grobman, William
Simon, Melissa
author_facet Kominiarek, Michelle A.
Vyhmeister, Heidi
Balmert, Lauren C.
Fairchild, Paige
Tolo, Hallie
Grobman, William
Simon, Melissa
author_sort Kominiarek, Michelle A.
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21–79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4–77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076–15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145–475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8–16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (p < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62–927 range) vs. 238 (212–290 range), p = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35–581 range) vs. 222 (196–272 range), p = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6267286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62672862018-11-30 Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study Kominiarek, Michelle A. Vyhmeister, Heidi Balmert, Lauren C. Fairchild, Paige Tolo, Hallie Grobman, William Simon, Melissa Biores Open Access Original Research Article To evaluate the feasibility (adherence to the study protocol and satisfaction) of using an activity tracking device (ATD) in group prenatal care. Women participated if they (1) were in group prenatal care, (2) owned a smartphone, and (3) had no activity restrictions. Women were instructed to wear and sync the ATD daily. Protocol adherence and satisfaction were assessed via surveys. Mixed models assessed the relationship between gestational age and ATD data. Self-reported energy expenditure from the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was compared with ATD-calculated energy expenditure. The baseline characteristics of the 49 women were as follows: 24 years old, prepregnancy body mass index 28, 80% Hispanic, 86% nulliparas, and 21 weeks of gestation. Of the 30 women who completed the follow-up survey, 47% self-reported wearing the ATD daily, 27% reported a lost or broken ATD, and 22% reported technical problems; however, 97% enjoyed wearing it, 100% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, and 77% thought it helped them reach activity goals. According to ATD data, the median active days were 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 21–79) and the median proportion of active days of potential days was 43.7% (IQR 15.4–77.1). For women who wore the ATD for the first 7 days, mean steps/day were 7574 (range 3076–15,828), active minutes/day were 277 (range 145–475), and sedentary hours/day were 12 (range 7.8–16.2). As gestational age increased, mean log steps decreased, mean active minutes decreased, and mean sedentary hours increased in unadjusted and adjusted models (p < 0.001 all comparisons). There were no differences in mean energy expenditure (MET-h/week) by PPAQ or ATD data at 28 weeks of gestation [231 (62–927 range) vs. 238 (212–290 range), p = 0.74] and at 36 weeks of gestation [145 (35–581 range) vs. 222 (196–272 range), p = 0.27]. Most women reported high satisfaction with an ATD in group prenatal care, yet adherence to the study protocol was low and ATD technical problems were common. As gestational age increased, activity decreased while sedentary time increased, suggesting that additional research is needed to find ways to engage women in physical activity during pregnancy. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2018-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6267286/ /pubmed/30505631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0021 Text en © Michelle A. Kominiarek et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kominiarek, Michelle A.
Vyhmeister, Heidi
Balmert, Lauren C.
Fairchild, Paige
Tolo, Hallie
Grobman, William
Simon, Melissa
Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title_full Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title_short Activity Tracking Devices in Group Prenatal Care: A Feasibility Study
title_sort activity tracking devices in group prenatal care: a feasibility study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/biores.2018.0021
work_keys_str_mv AT kominiarekmichellea activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT vyhmeisterheidi activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT balmertlaurenc activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT fairchildpaige activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT tolohallie activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT grobmanwilliam activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy
AT simonmelissa activitytrackingdevicesingroupprenatalcareafeasibilitystudy