Cargando…

Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker

Traditional video-based eyetrackers require participants to perform an individual calibration procedure, which involves the fixation of multiple points on a screen. However, certain participants (e.g., people with oculomotor and/or visual problems or infants) are unable to perform this task reliably...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D., Boonstra, F. Nienke, Goossens, Jeroen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29508237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1026-7
_version_ 1783376092577398784
author Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Boonstra, F. Nienke
Goossens, Jeroen
author_facet Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Boonstra, F. Nienke
Goossens, Jeroen
author_sort Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
collection PubMed
description Traditional video-based eyetrackers require participants to perform an individual calibration procedure, which involves the fixation of multiple points on a screen. However, certain participants (e.g., people with oculomotor and/or visual problems or infants) are unable to perform this task reliably. Previous work has shown that with two cameras one can estimate the orientation of the eyes’ optical axis directly. Consequently, only one calibration point is needed to determine the deviation between an eye’s optical and visual axes. We developed a stereo eyetracker with two USB 3.0 cameras and two infrared light sources that can track both eyes at ~ 350 Hz for eccentricities of up to 20°. A user interface allows for online monitoring and threshold adjustments of the pupil and corneal reflections. We validated this tracker by collecting eye movement data from nine healthy participants and compared these data to eye movement records obtained simultaneously with an established eyetracking system (EyeLink 1000 Plus). The results demonstrated that the two-dimensional accuracy of our portable system is better than 1°, allowing for at least ± 5-cm head motion. Its resolution is better than 0.2° (SD), and its sample-to-sample noise is less than 0.05° (RMS). We concluded that our stereo eyetracker is a valid instrument, especially in settings in which individual calibration is challenging. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1026-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6267515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62675152018-12-11 Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D. Boonstra, F. Nienke Goossens, Jeroen Behav Res Methods Article Traditional video-based eyetrackers require participants to perform an individual calibration procedure, which involves the fixation of multiple points on a screen. However, certain participants (e.g., people with oculomotor and/or visual problems or infants) are unable to perform this task reliably. Previous work has shown that with two cameras one can estimate the orientation of the eyes’ optical axis directly. Consequently, only one calibration point is needed to determine the deviation between an eye’s optical and visual axes. We developed a stereo eyetracker with two USB 3.0 cameras and two infrared light sources that can track both eyes at ~ 350 Hz for eccentricities of up to 20°. A user interface allows for online monitoring and threshold adjustments of the pupil and corneal reflections. We validated this tracker by collecting eye movement data from nine healthy participants and compared these data to eye movement records obtained simultaneously with an established eyetracking system (EyeLink 1000 Plus). The results demonstrated that the two-dimensional accuracy of our portable system is better than 1°, allowing for at least ± 5-cm head motion. Its resolution is better than 0.2° (SD), and its sample-to-sample noise is less than 0.05° (RMS). We concluded that our stereo eyetracker is a valid instrument, especially in settings in which individual calibration is challenging. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13428-018-1026-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-03-05 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6267515/ /pubmed/29508237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1026-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Boonstra, F. Nienke
Goossens, Jeroen
Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title_full Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title_fullStr Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title_short Development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
title_sort development and validation of a high-speed stereoscopic eyetracker
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29508237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1026-7
work_keys_str_mv AT barsingerhornannemiekd developmentandvalidationofahighspeedstereoscopiceyetracker
AT boonstrafnienke developmentandvalidationofahighspeedstereoscopiceyetracker
AT goossensjeroen developmentandvalidationofahighspeedstereoscopiceyetracker