Cargando…

Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is critically dependent on patients’ adherence to intake regimens. We studied the relative impact of attributes related to effectiveness, safety, convenience, and costs on the value of OAC therapy from the perspective of patients with non-val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weernink, Marieke G. M., Vaanholt, Melissa C. W., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M., von Birgelen, Clemens, IJzerman, Maarten J., van Til, Janine A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0
_version_ 1783376098463055872
author Weernink, Marieke G. M.
Vaanholt, Melissa C. W.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
IJzerman, Maarten J.
van Til, Janine A.
author_facet Weernink, Marieke G. M.
Vaanholt, Melissa C. W.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
IJzerman, Maarten J.
van Til, Janine A.
author_sort Weernink, Marieke G. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is critically dependent on patients’ adherence to intake regimens. We studied the relative impact of attributes related to effectiveness, safety, convenience, and costs on the value of OAC therapy from the perspective of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Four attributes were identified by literature review and expert interviews: effectiveness (risk of ischemic stroke), safety (risk of major bleeding, minor bleeding, gastrointestinal complaints), convenience (intake frequency, diet restrictions, international normalized ratio [INR] blood monitoring, pill type/intake instructions), and out-of-pocket costs. Focus groups were held in Spain, Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom (N = 48) to elicit patients’ preferences through the use of the analytical hierarchy process method. RESULTS: Effectiveness (60%) and side effects (27%) have a higher impact on the perceived value of OACs than drug convenience (7%) and out-of-pocket costs (6%). As for convenience, eliminating monthly INR monitoring was given the highest priority (40%), followed by reducing diet restrictions (27%), reducing intake frequency (17%) and improving the pill type/intake instructions (15%). The most important side effect was major bleeding (75%), followed by minor bleeding (15%) and gastrointestinal complaints (10%). Furthermore, 71% of patients preferred once-daily intake to twice-daily intake. DISCUSSION: Although the relative impact of convenience on therapy value is small, patients have different preferences for options within convenience criteria. Besides considerations on safety and effectiveness, physicians should also discuss attributes of convenience with patients, as it can be assumed that alignment to patient preferences in drug prescription and better patient education could result in higher adherence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6267541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62675412018-12-11 Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Weernink, Marieke G. M. Vaanholt, Melissa C. W. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M. von Birgelen, Clemens IJzerman, Maarten J. van Til, Janine A. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Effectiveness of oral anticoagulants (OACs) is critically dependent on patients’ adherence to intake regimens. We studied the relative impact of attributes related to effectiveness, safety, convenience, and costs on the value of OAC therapy from the perspective of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Four attributes were identified by literature review and expert interviews: effectiveness (risk of ischemic stroke), safety (risk of major bleeding, minor bleeding, gastrointestinal complaints), convenience (intake frequency, diet restrictions, international normalized ratio [INR] blood monitoring, pill type/intake instructions), and out-of-pocket costs. Focus groups were held in Spain, Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom (N = 48) to elicit patients’ preferences through the use of the analytical hierarchy process method. RESULTS: Effectiveness (60%) and side effects (27%) have a higher impact on the perceived value of OACs than drug convenience (7%) and out-of-pocket costs (6%). As for convenience, eliminating monthly INR monitoring was given the highest priority (40%), followed by reducing diet restrictions (27%), reducing intake frequency (17%) and improving the pill type/intake instructions (15%). The most important side effect was major bleeding (75%), followed by minor bleeding (15%) and gastrointestinal complaints (10%). Furthermore, 71% of patients preferred once-daily intake to twice-daily intake. DISCUSSION: Although the relative impact of convenience on therapy value is small, patients have different preferences for options within convenience criteria. Besides considerations on safety and effectiveness, physicians should also discuss attributes of convenience with patients, as it can be assumed that alignment to patient preferences in drug prescription and better patient education could result in higher adherence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6267541/ /pubmed/30132140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Weernink, Marieke G. M.
Vaanholt, Melissa C. W.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
IJzerman, Maarten J.
van Til, Janine A.
Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title_full Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title_fullStr Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title_short Patients’ Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
title_sort patients’ priorities for oral anticoagulation therapy in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a multi-criteria decision analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30132140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40256-018-0293-0
work_keys_str_mv AT weerninkmariekegm patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT vaanholtmelissacw patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT groothuisoudshoorncatharinagm patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT vonbirgelenclemens patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT ijzermanmaartenj patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT vantiljaninea patientsprioritiesfororalanticoagulationtherapyinnonvalvularatrialfibrillationamulticriteriadecisionanalysis