Cargando…

Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space

It is widely accepted that the integration of visual and tactile information is a necessity to induce ownership over a rubber hand. This idea has recently been challenged by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1–7, 2013), as they found that sense of ownership was evident by mere expectation of touch. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smit, M., Brummelman, J. T. H., Keizer, A., van der Smagt, M. J., Dijkerman, H. C., van der Ham, I. J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5361-9
_version_ 1783376132833280000
author Smit, M.
Brummelman, J. T. H.
Keizer, A.
van der Smagt, M. J.
Dijkerman, H. C.
van der Ham, I. J. M.
author_facet Smit, M.
Brummelman, J. T. H.
Keizer, A.
van der Smagt, M. J.
Dijkerman, H. C.
van der Ham, I. J. M.
author_sort Smit, M.
collection PubMed
description It is widely accepted that the integration of visual and tactile information is a necessity to induce ownership over a rubber hand. This idea has recently been challenged by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1–7, 2013), as they found that sense of ownership was evident by mere expectation of touch. In our study, we aimed to further investigate this finding, by studying whether the mere potential for touch yields a sense of ownership similar in magnitude to that resulting from actually being touched. We conducted two experiments. In the first experiment, our set-up was the classical horizontal set-up (similar to Botvinick and Cohen, Nature 391:756, 1998). Sixty-three individuals were included and performed the classical conditions (synchronous, asynchronous), an approached but not touched (potential for touch), and a ‘visual only’ condition. In the second experiment, we controlled for differences between the current set-up and the vertical set-up used by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1–7, 2013). Fifteen individuals were included and performed a synchronous and various approaching conditions [i.e., vertical approach, horizontal approach, and a control approach (no hands)]. In our first experiment, we found that approaching the rubber hand neither induced a larger proprioceptive drift nor a stronger subjective sense of ownership than asynchronous stimulation did. Generally, our participants gained most sense of ownership in the synchronous condition, followed by the visual only condition. When using a vertical set-up (second experiment), we confirmed previous suggestions that tactile expectation was able to induce embodiment over a foreign hand, similar in magnitude to actual touch, but only when the real and rubber hand were aligned on the vertical axis, thus along the trajectory of the approaching stimulus. These results indicate that our brain uses bottom-up sensory information, as well as top-down predictions for building a representation of our body.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6267689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62676892018-12-18 Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space Smit, M. Brummelman, J. T. H. Keizer, A. van der Smagt, M. J. Dijkerman, H. C. van der Ham, I. J. M. Exp Brain Res Research Article It is widely accepted that the integration of visual and tactile information is a necessity to induce ownership over a rubber hand. This idea has recently been challenged by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1–7, 2013), as they found that sense of ownership was evident by mere expectation of touch. In our study, we aimed to further investigate this finding, by studying whether the mere potential for touch yields a sense of ownership similar in magnitude to that resulting from actually being touched. We conducted two experiments. In the first experiment, our set-up was the classical horizontal set-up (similar to Botvinick and Cohen, Nature 391:756, 1998). Sixty-three individuals were included and performed the classical conditions (synchronous, asynchronous), an approached but not touched (potential for touch), and a ‘visual only’ condition. In the second experiment, we controlled for differences between the current set-up and the vertical set-up used by Ferri et al. (Proc R Soc B 280:1–7, 2013). Fifteen individuals were included and performed a synchronous and various approaching conditions [i.e., vertical approach, horizontal approach, and a control approach (no hands)]. In our first experiment, we found that approaching the rubber hand neither induced a larger proprioceptive drift nor a stronger subjective sense of ownership than asynchronous stimulation did. Generally, our participants gained most sense of ownership in the synchronous condition, followed by the visual only condition. When using a vertical set-up (second experiment), we confirmed previous suggestions that tactile expectation was able to induce embodiment over a foreign hand, similar in magnitude to actual touch, but only when the real and rubber hand were aligned on the vertical axis, thus along the trajectory of the approaching stimulus. These results indicate that our brain uses bottom-up sensory information, as well as top-down predictions for building a representation of our body. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-09-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6267689/ /pubmed/30220004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5361-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smit, M.
Brummelman, J. T. H.
Keizer, A.
van der Smagt, M. J.
Dijkerman, H. C.
van der Ham, I. J. M.
Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title_full Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title_fullStr Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title_full_unstemmed Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title_short Body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
title_sort body ownership and the absence of touch: approaching the rubber hand inside and outside peri-hand space
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5361-9
work_keys_str_mv AT smitm bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace
AT brummelmanjth bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace
AT keizera bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace
AT vandersmagtmj bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace
AT dijkermanhc bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace
AT vanderhamijm bodyownershipandtheabsenceoftouchapproachingtherubberhandinsideandoutsideperihandspace