Cargando…
Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer’s disease before and after PRISMA introduction
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are distillation of current best available evidence, but are potentially prone to bias. The bias of SRs and MAs comes from sampling bias, selection bias and within study bias. So, their reporting quality is especially important as it may d...
Autores principales: | Sun, Xiao, Zhou, Xiaobin, Yu, Yan, Liu, Haihua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0622-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement
por: Nawijn, Femke, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
To Be or Not to Be: Addressing of PRISMA Checklist for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
por: Amiri, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines
por: Basenach, Lara, et al.
Publicado: (2023)