Cargando…
Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey
BACKGROUND: Dose-response meta-analysis (DRMA) is a useful tool to investigate potential dose-response relationship between certain exposure or intervention and the outcome of interest. A large number of DRMAs have been published in the past several years. However, the standard of reporting for such...
Autores principales: | Xu, Chang, Liu, Tong-Zu, Jia, Peng-Li, Liu, Yu, Li, Ling, Cheng, Liang-Liang, Sun, Xin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0623-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study
por: Gao, Ya, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey
por: Xu, Chang, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Tests Published by Authors in China
por: Ge, Long, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study
por: Chen, Yuehong, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional survey
por: Jia, Pengli, et al.
Publicado: (2018)