Cargando…
Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012
For the first time, the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported prevalence estimates based on two different diagnostic schemes in the 2014 surveillance period. Results found substantial agreement between surveil...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30500831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208079 |
_version_ | 1783376187660173312 |
---|---|
author | Wiggins, Lisa Christensen, Deborah Van Naarden Braun, Kim Martin, Lisa Baio, Jon |
author_facet | Wiggins, Lisa Christensen, Deborah Van Naarden Braun, Kim Martin, Lisa Baio, Jon |
author_sort | Wiggins, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | For the first time, the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported prevalence estimates based on two different diagnostic schemes in the 2014 surveillance period. Results found substantial agreement between surveillance case status based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition–Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria and DSM-5 criteria ASD (kappa = 0.85). No study has replicated this agreement in another independent sample of surveillance records. The objectives of this study were to (1) replicate agreement between surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD, (2) quantify the number of children who met surveillance status based on only DSM-IV-TR criteria and only DSM-5 criteria for ASD, and (3) evaluate differences in characteristics of these latter two groups of children. The study sample was 8-year-old children who had health and education records reviewed for ASD surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, GA in the 2012 surveillance year. Results found substantial agreement between child’s surveillance status using DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD (kappa = 0.80). There were no differences in child race/ethnicity, child sex, or intellectual disability between surveillance status defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria and that defined by DSM-5 criteria. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, but not DSM-5 criteria, were more likely to have developmental concerns and evaluations in the first three years. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-5 criteria, but not DSM-IV-TR criteria, were more likely to have been receiving autism-related services or previously diagnosed with ASD. These results suggest that surveillance status of ASD based on DSM-5 criteria is largely comparable to that based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, and identifies children with similar demographic and intellectual characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6267977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62679772018-12-19 Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 Wiggins, Lisa Christensen, Deborah Van Naarden Braun, Kim Martin, Lisa Baio, Jon PLoS One Research Article For the first time, the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported prevalence estimates based on two different diagnostic schemes in the 2014 surveillance period. Results found substantial agreement between surveillance case status based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fourth Edition–Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria and DSM-5 criteria ASD (kappa = 0.85). No study has replicated this agreement in another independent sample of surveillance records. The objectives of this study were to (1) replicate agreement between surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD, (2) quantify the number of children who met surveillance status based on only DSM-IV-TR criteria and only DSM-5 criteria for ASD, and (3) evaluate differences in characteristics of these latter two groups of children. The study sample was 8-year-old children who had health and education records reviewed for ASD surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, GA in the 2012 surveillance year. Results found substantial agreement between child’s surveillance status using DSM-IV-TR criteria and DSM-5 criteria for ASD (kappa = 0.80). There were no differences in child race/ethnicity, child sex, or intellectual disability between surveillance status defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria and that defined by DSM-5 criteria. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, but not DSM-5 criteria, were more likely to have developmental concerns and evaluations in the first three years. Children who met surveillance status based on DSM-5 criteria, but not DSM-IV-TR criteria, were more likely to have been receiving autism-related services or previously diagnosed with ASD. These results suggest that surveillance status of ASD based on DSM-5 criteria is largely comparable to that based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, and identifies children with similar demographic and intellectual characteristics. Public Library of Science 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6267977/ /pubmed/30500831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208079 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wiggins, Lisa Christensen, Deborah Van Naarden Braun, Kim Martin, Lisa Baio, Jon Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title | Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title_full | Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title_short | Comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: Findings from the Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 2012 |
title_sort | comparison of autism spectrum disorder surveillance status based on two different diagnostic schemes: findings from the metropolitan atlanta developmental disabilities surveillance program, 2012 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6267977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30500831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wigginslisa comparisonofautismspectrumdisordersurveillancestatusbasedontwodifferentdiagnosticschemesfindingsfromthemetropolitanatlantadevelopmentaldisabilitiessurveillanceprogram2012 AT christensendeborah comparisonofautismspectrumdisordersurveillancestatusbasedontwodifferentdiagnosticschemesfindingsfromthemetropolitanatlantadevelopmentaldisabilitiessurveillanceprogram2012 AT vannaardenbraunkim comparisonofautismspectrumdisordersurveillancestatusbasedontwodifferentdiagnosticschemesfindingsfromthemetropolitanatlantadevelopmentaldisabilitiessurveillanceprogram2012 AT martinlisa comparisonofautismspectrumdisordersurveillancestatusbasedontwodifferentdiagnosticschemesfindingsfromthemetropolitanatlantadevelopmentaldisabilitiessurveillanceprogram2012 AT baiojon comparisonofautismspectrumdisordersurveillancestatusbasedontwodifferentdiagnosticschemesfindingsfromthemetropolitanatlantadevelopmentaldisabilitiessurveillanceprogram2012 |