Cargando…

Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action

Twenty one phenylpropanoids (including eugenol and safrole) and synthetic analogues, thirteen of them new compounds, were evaluated for antifungal properties, first with non-targeted assays against a panel of human opportunistic pathogenic fungi. Some structure-activity relationships could be observ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrasco, Héctor, Raimondi, Marcela, Svetaz, Laura, Liberto, Melina Di, Rodriguez, María V., Espinoza, Luis, Madrid, Alejandro, Zacchino, Susana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6268595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22262200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules17011002
_version_ 1783376322676916224
author Carrasco, Héctor
Raimondi, Marcela
Svetaz, Laura
Liberto, Melina Di
Rodriguez, María V.
Espinoza, Luis
Madrid, Alejandro
Zacchino, Susana
author_facet Carrasco, Héctor
Raimondi, Marcela
Svetaz, Laura
Liberto, Melina Di
Rodriguez, María V.
Espinoza, Luis
Madrid, Alejandro
Zacchino, Susana
author_sort Carrasco, Héctor
collection PubMed
description Twenty one phenylpropanoids (including eugenol and safrole) and synthetic analogues, thirteen of them new compounds, were evaluated for antifungal properties, first with non-targeted assays against a panel of human opportunistic pathogenic fungi. Some structure-activity relationships could be observed, mainly related to the influence of an allyl substituent at C-4, an OH group at C-1 and an OCH(3) at C-2 or the presence of one or two NO(2) groups in different positions of the benzene ring. All active compounds were tested in a second panel of clinical isolates of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans and dermatophytes. The eugenol derivative 4-allyl-2-methoxy-5-nitrophenol (2) was the most active structure against all strains tested, and therefore it was submitted to targeted assays. These studies showed that the antifungal activity of 2 was not reversed in the presence of an osmotic support such as sorbitol, suggesting that it does not act by inhibiting the fungal cell wall synthesis or assembly. On the other hand, the Ergosterol Assay showed that 2 did not bind to the main sterol of the fungal membrane up to 250 µg mL(−1). In contrast, a 22% of fungal membrane damage was observed at concentrations = 1 × MIC and 71% at 4× MIC, when 2 was tested in the Cellular Leakage assay. The comparison of log P and MICs for all compounds revealed that the antifungal activity of the eugenol analogues would not to be related to lipophilicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6268595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62685952018-12-11 Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action Carrasco, Héctor Raimondi, Marcela Svetaz, Laura Liberto, Melina Di Rodriguez, María V. Espinoza, Luis Madrid, Alejandro Zacchino, Susana Molecules Article Twenty one phenylpropanoids (including eugenol and safrole) and synthetic analogues, thirteen of them new compounds, were evaluated for antifungal properties, first with non-targeted assays against a panel of human opportunistic pathogenic fungi. Some structure-activity relationships could be observed, mainly related to the influence of an allyl substituent at C-4, an OH group at C-1 and an OCH(3) at C-2 or the presence of one or two NO(2) groups in different positions of the benzene ring. All active compounds were tested in a second panel of clinical isolates of C. albicans and non-albicans Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans and dermatophytes. The eugenol derivative 4-allyl-2-methoxy-5-nitrophenol (2) was the most active structure against all strains tested, and therefore it was submitted to targeted assays. These studies showed that the antifungal activity of 2 was not reversed in the presence of an osmotic support such as sorbitol, suggesting that it does not act by inhibiting the fungal cell wall synthesis or assembly. On the other hand, the Ergosterol Assay showed that 2 did not bind to the main sterol of the fungal membrane up to 250 µg mL(−1). In contrast, a 22% of fungal membrane damage was observed at concentrations = 1 × MIC and 71% at 4× MIC, when 2 was tested in the Cellular Leakage assay. The comparison of log P and MICs for all compounds revealed that the antifungal activity of the eugenol analogues would not to be related to lipophilicity. MDPI 2012-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6268595/ /pubmed/22262200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules17011002 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carrasco, Héctor
Raimondi, Marcela
Svetaz, Laura
Liberto, Melina Di
Rodriguez, María V.
Espinoza, Luis
Madrid, Alejandro
Zacchino, Susana
Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title_full Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title_fullStr Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title_full_unstemmed Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title_short Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Analogues. Influence of Different Substituents and Studies on Mechanism of Action
title_sort antifungal activity of eugenol analogues. influence of different substituents and studies on mechanism of action
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6268595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22262200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules17011002
work_keys_str_mv AT carrascohector antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT raimondimarcela antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT svetazlaura antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT libertomelinadi antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT rodriguezmariav antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT espinozaluis antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT madridalejandro antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction
AT zacchinosusana antifungalactivityofeugenolanaloguesinfluenceofdifferentsubstituentsandstudiesonmechanismofaction