Cargando…

Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?

Objective  To determine the rate of unsuspected noncardiac abnormalities in newborns suspected to have isolated cardiac abnormalities in the second trimester. Study Design  A review of the ultrasound database from the Weill Cornell Medical Center identified fetuses with a suspected cardiac abnormali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razavi, Armin S., Chasen, Stephen T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675349
_version_ 1783376451692658688
author Razavi, Armin S.
Chasen, Stephen T.
author_facet Razavi, Armin S.
Chasen, Stephen T.
author_sort Razavi, Armin S.
collection PubMed
description Objective  To determine the rate of unsuspected noncardiac abnormalities in newborns suspected to have isolated cardiac abnormalities in the second trimester. Study Design  A review of the ultrasound database from the Weill Cornell Medical Center identified fetuses with a suspected cardiac abnormality from January 2006 to November 2016. Cases with prenatally suspected noncardiac structural abnormalities, abnormal fetal or neonatal karyotype or microarray, and those who delivered at an outside institution or underwent abortion were excluded. Neonatal records were reviewed to confirm prenatal findings and to identify anomalies not suspected in the second trimester. Results  Sixty-eight live births met the inclusion criteria. Five newborns (7.4%) had major abnormalities not identified in the second trimester. Three newborns had an imperforate anus. One newborn had left hydronephrosis and absent right lung, and one had hemifacial microsomia and fused ribs. All five newborns with unsuspected anomalies were in the group with suspected conotruncal anomalies, with a 11.9% rate of unsuspected anomalies versus 0% in those with nonconotruncal cardiac anomalies ( p  = 0.15). Conclusion  Patients with a suspected isolated fetal cardiac anomaly on ultrasound should be aware of the possibility of other major structural abnormalities, especially in cases of conotruncal cardiac anomalies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6269235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62692352018-12-03 Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated? Razavi, Armin S. Chasen, Stephen T. AJP Rep Objective  To determine the rate of unsuspected noncardiac abnormalities in newborns suspected to have isolated cardiac abnormalities in the second trimester. Study Design  A review of the ultrasound database from the Weill Cornell Medical Center identified fetuses with a suspected cardiac abnormality from January 2006 to November 2016. Cases with prenatally suspected noncardiac structural abnormalities, abnormal fetal or neonatal karyotype or microarray, and those who delivered at an outside institution or underwent abortion were excluded. Neonatal records were reviewed to confirm prenatal findings and to identify anomalies not suspected in the second trimester. Results  Sixty-eight live births met the inclusion criteria. Five newborns (7.4%) had major abnormalities not identified in the second trimester. Three newborns had an imperforate anus. One newborn had left hydronephrosis and absent right lung, and one had hemifacial microsomia and fused ribs. All five newborns with unsuspected anomalies were in the group with suspected conotruncal anomalies, with a 11.9% rate of unsuspected anomalies versus 0% in those with nonconotruncal cardiac anomalies ( p  = 0.15). Conclusion  Patients with a suspected isolated fetal cardiac anomaly on ultrasound should be aware of the possibility of other major structural abnormalities, especially in cases of conotruncal cardiac anomalies. Thieme Medical Publishers 2018-10 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6269235/ /pubmed/30510841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675349 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Razavi, Armin S.
Chasen, Stephen T.
Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title_full Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title_fullStr Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title_full_unstemmed Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title_short Isolated Fetal Cardiac Abnormalities: Are They Really Isolated?
title_sort isolated fetal cardiac abnormalities: are they really isolated?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675349
work_keys_str_mv AT razaviarmins isolatedfetalcardiacabnormalitiesaretheyreallyisolated
AT chasenstephent isolatedfetalcardiacabnormalitiesaretheyreallyisolated