Cargando…
Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation
Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are used in experimental and clinical fields for their potential effects on brain network dynamics and behavior. Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30504921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07233-7 |
_version_ | 1783376467854360576 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Anli Vöröslakos, Mihály Kronberg, Greg Henin, Simon Krause, Matthew R. Huang, Yu Opitz, Alexander Mehta, Ashesh Pack, Christopher C. Krekelberg, Bart Berényi, Antal Parra, Lucas C. Melloni, Lucia Devinsky, Orrin Buzsáki, György |
author_facet | Liu, Anli Vöröslakos, Mihály Kronberg, Greg Henin, Simon Krause, Matthew R. Huang, Yu Opitz, Alexander Mehta, Ashesh Pack, Christopher C. Krekelberg, Bart Berényi, Antal Parra, Lucas C. Melloni, Lucia Devinsky, Orrin Buzsáki, György |
author_sort | Liu, Anli |
collection | PubMed |
description | Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are used in experimental and clinical fields for their potential effects on brain network dynamics and behavior. Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has gained popularity because of its convenience and potential as a chronic therapy. However, a mechanistic understanding of TES has lagged behind its widespread adoption. Here, we review data and modelling on the immediate neurophysiological effects of TES in vitro as well as in vivo in both humans and other animals. While it remains unclear how typical TES protocols affect neural activity, we propose that validated models of current flow should inform study design and artifacts should be carefully excluded during signal recording and analysis. Potential indirect effects of TES (e.g., peripheral stimulation) should be investigated in more detail and further explored in experimental designs. We also consider how novel technologies may stimulate the next generation of TES experiments and devices, thus enhancing validity, specificity, and reproducibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6269428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62694282018-12-03 Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation Liu, Anli Vöröslakos, Mihály Kronberg, Greg Henin, Simon Krause, Matthew R. Huang, Yu Opitz, Alexander Mehta, Ashesh Pack, Christopher C. Krekelberg, Bart Berényi, Antal Parra, Lucas C. Melloni, Lucia Devinsky, Orrin Buzsáki, György Nat Commun Review Article Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques are used in experimental and clinical fields for their potential effects on brain network dynamics and behavior. Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has gained popularity because of its convenience and potential as a chronic therapy. However, a mechanistic understanding of TES has lagged behind its widespread adoption. Here, we review data and modelling on the immediate neurophysiological effects of TES in vitro as well as in vivo in both humans and other animals. While it remains unclear how typical TES protocols affect neural activity, we propose that validated models of current flow should inform study design and artifacts should be carefully excluded during signal recording and analysis. Potential indirect effects of TES (e.g., peripheral stimulation) should be investigated in more detail and further explored in experimental designs. We also consider how novel technologies may stimulate the next generation of TES experiments and devices, thus enhancing validity, specificity, and reproducibility. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6269428/ /pubmed/30504921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07233-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Liu, Anli Vöröslakos, Mihály Kronberg, Greg Henin, Simon Krause, Matthew R. Huang, Yu Opitz, Alexander Mehta, Ashesh Pack, Christopher C. Krekelberg, Bart Berényi, Antal Parra, Lucas C. Melloni, Lucia Devinsky, Orrin Buzsáki, György Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title | Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title_full | Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title_fullStr | Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title_short | Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
title_sort | immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30504921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07233-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuanli immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT voroslakosmihaly immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT kronberggreg immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT heninsimon immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT krausematthewr immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT huangyu immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT opitzalexander immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT mehtaashesh immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT packchristopherc immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT krekelbergbart immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT berenyiantal immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT parralucasc immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT mellonilucia immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT devinskyorrin immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation AT buzsakigyorgy immediateneurophysiologicaleffectsoftranscranialelectricalstimulation |