Cargando…

Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants

OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty. Non-contact induction heating of metal implants is a new and emerging treatment for PJI. However, there may be concerns for potential tissue necrosis. It is thought that segmental induction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pijls, B. G., Sanders, I. M. J. G., Kuijper, E. J., Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0080.R1
_version_ 1783376506238533632
author Pijls, B. G.
Sanders, I. M. J. G.
Kuijper, E. J.
Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
author_facet Pijls, B. G.
Sanders, I. M. J. G.
Kuijper, E. J.
Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
author_sort Pijls, B. G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty. Non-contact induction heating of metal implants is a new and emerging treatment for PJI. However, there may be concerns for potential tissue necrosis. It is thought that segmental induction heating can be used to control the thermal dose and to limit collateral thermal injury to the bone and surrounding tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the thermal dose, for commonly used metal implants in orthopaedic surgery, at various distances from the heating centre (HC). METHODS: Commonly used metal orthopaedic implants (hip stem, intramedullary nail, and locking compression plate (LCP)) were heated segmentally using an induction heater. The thermal dose was expressed in cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C (CEM43) and measured with a thermal camera at several different distances from the HC. A value of 16 CEM43 was used as the threshold for thermal damage in bone. RESULTS: Despite high thermal doses at the HC (7161 CEM43 to 66 640 CEM43), the thermal dose at various distances from the HC was lower than 16 CEM43 for the hip stem and nail. For the fracture plate without corresponding metal screws, doses higher than 16 CEM43 were measured up to 5 mm from the HC. CONCLUSION: Segmental induction heating concentrates the thermal dose at the targeted metal implant areas and minimizes collateral thermal injury by using the non-heated metal as a heat sink. Implant type and geometry are important factors to consider, as they influence dissipation of heat and associated collateral thermal injury. Cite this article: B. G. Pijls, I. M. J. G. Sanders, E. J. Kuijper, R. G. H. H. Nelissen. Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:609–619. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0080.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6269597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62695972018-12-21 Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants Pijls, B. G. Sanders, I. M. J. G. Kuijper, E. J. Nelissen, R. G. H. H. Bone Joint Res Infection OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasty. Non-contact induction heating of metal implants is a new and emerging treatment for PJI. However, there may be concerns for potential tissue necrosis. It is thought that segmental induction heating can be used to control the thermal dose and to limit collateral thermal injury to the bone and surrounding tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the thermal dose, for commonly used metal implants in orthopaedic surgery, at various distances from the heating centre (HC). METHODS: Commonly used metal orthopaedic implants (hip stem, intramedullary nail, and locking compression plate (LCP)) were heated segmentally using an induction heater. The thermal dose was expressed in cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C (CEM43) and measured with a thermal camera at several different distances from the HC. A value of 16 CEM43 was used as the threshold for thermal damage in bone. RESULTS: Despite high thermal doses at the HC (7161 CEM43 to 66 640 CEM43), the thermal dose at various distances from the HC was lower than 16 CEM43 for the hip stem and nail. For the fracture plate without corresponding metal screws, doses higher than 16 CEM43 were measured up to 5 mm from the HC. CONCLUSION: Segmental induction heating concentrates the thermal dose at the targeted metal implant areas and minimizes collateral thermal injury by using the non-heated metal as a heat sink. Implant type and geometry are important factors to consider, as they influence dissipation of heat and associated collateral thermal injury. Cite this article: B. G. Pijls, I. M. J. G. Sanders, E. J. Kuijper, R. G. H. H. Nelissen. Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:609–619. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0080.R1. 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6269597/ /pubmed/30581559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0080.R1 Text en © 2018 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Infection
Pijls, B. G.
Sanders, I. M. J. G.
Kuijper, E. J.
Nelissen, R. G. H. H.
Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title_full Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title_fullStr Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title_full_unstemmed Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title_short Segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
title_sort segmental induction heating of orthopaedic metal implants
topic Infection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0080.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT pijlsbg segmentalinductionheatingoforthopaedicmetalimplants
AT sandersimjg segmentalinductionheatingoforthopaedicmetalimplants
AT kuijperej segmentalinductionheatingoforthopaedicmetalimplants
AT nelissenrghh segmentalinductionheatingoforthopaedicmetalimplants