Cargando…

Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases

BACKGROUND: Lymphoma is common in the dog. Studies of population risk factors primarily have been derived from referral institution or insurance data. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the host risk factors for lymphoma in a broad population of Australian dogs. ANIMALS: Data on 6201 client owned d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Peter F., Taylor, Rosanne, Williamson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6271309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15306
_version_ 1783376898770862080
author Bennett, Peter F.
Taylor, Rosanne
Williamson, Peter
author_facet Bennett, Peter F.
Taylor, Rosanne
Williamson, Peter
author_sort Bennett, Peter F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymphoma is common in the dog. Studies of population risk factors primarily have been derived from referral institution or insurance data. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the host risk factors for lymphoma in a broad population of Australian dogs. ANIMALS: Data on 6201 client owned dogs were retrieved from a commercial veterinary laboratory, a general practice group and 2 referral hospitals. METHODS: Data collected included breed, sex, and neuter status. A reference population of 640 105 dogs was generated from the referral hospitals and from council registration data. The risk of lymphoma by sex and neuter status was calculated as odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: The study identified 30 breeds at increased risk of lymphoma, 15 that have not been reported previously, and 26 breeds at decreased risk, 18 that have not been reported previously. Males were over represented compared to females with an OR of 1.1 (95% CI, 1.1–1.2; P < .001). Neutered animals were at higher risk compared to intact animals with an OR of 3.2 (95% CI, 2.9–3.5) which was found in both males (OR, 2.8; 95% CI; 2.5–3.2) and females (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 3.5–5.1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Breed, sex, and neuter status alter the risk of lymphoma in dogs. These 3 factors must be considered when evaluating lymphoma risk as potential markers of underlying differences in disease etiology. Comparison of breeds at increased and decreased risk could be advantageous when evaluating specific etiological factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6271309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62713092018-12-05 Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases Bennett, Peter F. Taylor, Rosanne Williamson, Peter J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Lymphoma is common in the dog. Studies of population risk factors primarily have been derived from referral institution or insurance data. OBJECTIVE: To identify and quantify the host risk factors for lymphoma in a broad population of Australian dogs. ANIMALS: Data on 6201 client owned dogs were retrieved from a commercial veterinary laboratory, a general practice group and 2 referral hospitals. METHODS: Data collected included breed, sex, and neuter status. A reference population of 640 105 dogs was generated from the referral hospitals and from council registration data. The risk of lymphoma by sex and neuter status was calculated as odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: The study identified 30 breeds at increased risk of lymphoma, 15 that have not been reported previously, and 26 breeds at decreased risk, 18 that have not been reported previously. Males were over represented compared to females with an OR of 1.1 (95% CI, 1.1–1.2; P < .001). Neutered animals were at higher risk compared to intact animals with an OR of 3.2 (95% CI, 2.9–3.5) which was found in both males (OR, 2.8; 95% CI; 2.5–3.2) and females (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 3.5–5.1). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Breed, sex, and neuter status alter the risk of lymphoma in dogs. These 3 factors must be considered when evaluating lymphoma risk as potential markers of underlying differences in disease etiology. Comparison of breeds at increased and decreased risk could be advantageous when evaluating specific etiological factors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-10-11 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6271309/ /pubmed/30307659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15306 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle SMALL ANIMAL
Bennett, Peter F.
Taylor, Rosanne
Williamson, Peter
Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title_full Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title_fullStr Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title_full_unstemmed Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title_short Demographic risk factors for lymphoma in Australian dogs: 6201 cases
title_sort demographic risk factors for lymphoma in australian dogs: 6201 cases
topic SMALL ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6271309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15306
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettpeterf demographicriskfactorsforlymphomainaustraliandogs6201cases
AT taylorrosanne demographicriskfactorsforlymphomainaustraliandogs6201cases
AT williamsonpeter demographicriskfactorsforlymphomainaustraliandogs6201cases