Cargando…

Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies

Micro-fabricated devices integrated with fluidic components provide an in vitro platform for cell studies best mimicking the in vivo micro-environment. These devices are capable of creating precise and controllable surroundings of pH value, temperature, salt concentration, and other physical or chem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sun, Yung-Shin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6273264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060778
_version_ 1783377344183926784
author Sun, Yung-Shin
author_facet Sun, Yung-Shin
author_sort Sun, Yung-Shin
collection PubMed
description Micro-fabricated devices integrated with fluidic components provide an in vitro platform for cell studies best mimicking the in vivo micro-environment. These devices are capable of creating precise and controllable surroundings of pH value, temperature, salt concentration, and other physical or chemical stimuli. Various cell studies such as chemotaxis and electrotaxis can be performed by using such devices. Moreover, microfluidic chips are designed and fabricated for applications in cell separations such as circulating tumor cell (CTC) chips. Usually, there are two most commonly used inlets in connecting the microfluidic chip to sample/reagent loading tubes: the vertical (top-loading) inlet and the parallel (in-line) inlet. Designing this macro-to-micro interface is believed to play an important role in device performance. In this study, by using the commercial COMSOL Multiphysics software, we compared the cell capture behavior in microfluidic devices with different inlet types and sample flow velocities. Three different inlets were constructed: the vertical inlet, the parallel inlet, and the vertically parallel inlet. We investigated the velocity field, the flow streamline, the cell capture rate, and the laminar shear stress in these inlets. It was concluded that the inlet should be designed depending on the experimental purpose, i.e., one wants to maximize or minimize cell capture. Also, although increasing the flow velocity could reduce cell sedimentation, too high shear stresses are thought harmful to cells. Our findings indicate that the inlet design and flow velocity are crucial and should be well considered in fabricating microfluidic devices for cell studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6273264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62732642018-12-28 Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies Sun, Yung-Shin Molecules Article Micro-fabricated devices integrated with fluidic components provide an in vitro platform for cell studies best mimicking the in vivo micro-environment. These devices are capable of creating precise and controllable surroundings of pH value, temperature, salt concentration, and other physical or chemical stimuli. Various cell studies such as chemotaxis and electrotaxis can be performed by using such devices. Moreover, microfluidic chips are designed and fabricated for applications in cell separations such as circulating tumor cell (CTC) chips. Usually, there are two most commonly used inlets in connecting the microfluidic chip to sample/reagent loading tubes: the vertical (top-loading) inlet and the parallel (in-line) inlet. Designing this macro-to-micro interface is believed to play an important role in device performance. In this study, by using the commercial COMSOL Multiphysics software, we compared the cell capture behavior in microfluidic devices with different inlet types and sample flow velocities. Three different inlets were constructed: the vertical inlet, the parallel inlet, and the vertically parallel inlet. We investigated the velocity field, the flow streamline, the cell capture rate, and the laminar shear stress in these inlets. It was concluded that the inlet should be designed depending on the experimental purpose, i.e., one wants to maximize or minimize cell capture. Also, although increasing the flow velocity could reduce cell sedimentation, too high shear stresses are thought harmful to cells. Our findings indicate that the inlet design and flow velocity are crucial and should be well considered in fabricating microfluidic devices for cell studies. MDPI 2016-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6273264/ /pubmed/27314318 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060778 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Yung-Shin
Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title_full Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title_fullStr Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title_short Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies
title_sort comparison of chip inlet geometry in microfluidic devices for cell studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6273264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27314318
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060778
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyungshin comparisonofchipinletgeometryinmicrofluidicdevicesforcellstudies