Cargando…

Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods

The enantiomeric distribution and profile of volatiles in plants, which affect the biological and organoleptic properties, can be varied depending on extraction methods as well as their cultivars. The secondary volatile components of the needles of three conifer cultivars (Chamaecyparispisifera, Cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun, Yonjin, Lee, Sang Mi, Ju, Hyun Kyoung, Lee, Hong Jin, Choi, Hyung-Kyoon, Jo, Gyeong Suk, Kim, Young-Suk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6274459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26999095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21030363
_version_ 1783377623199514624
author Jun, Yonjin
Lee, Sang Mi
Ju, Hyun Kyoung
Lee, Hong Jin
Choi, Hyung-Kyoon
Jo, Gyeong Suk
Kim, Young-Suk
author_facet Jun, Yonjin
Lee, Sang Mi
Ju, Hyun Kyoung
Lee, Hong Jin
Choi, Hyung-Kyoon
Jo, Gyeong Suk
Kim, Young-Suk
author_sort Jun, Yonjin
collection PubMed
description The enantiomeric distribution and profile of volatiles in plants, which affect the biological and organoleptic properties, can be varied depending on extraction methods as well as their cultivars. The secondary volatile components of the needles of three conifer cultivars (Chamaecyparispisifera, Chamaecyparisobtusa, and Thujaorientalis) were compared. Furthermore, the effects of three different extraction methods—solid-phase microextraction (SPME), steam distillation (SD), and solvent extraction (SE)—on the composition and enantiomeric distribution of those volatiles were elucidated. Monoterpene hydrocarbons predominated in all samples, and the compositions of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes differed according to the cultivar. In particular, the yields of oxygenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were greatest for SD, whereas those of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes were highest for SE. On the other hand, more monoterpenes with higher volatility could be obtained with SPME and SD than when using SE. In addition, the enantiomeric composition of nine chiral compounds found in three cultivars differed according to their chemotype. There were also some differences in the yielded oxygenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, but not monoterpene hydrocarbons, according to the extraction method. These results demonstrate that the extraction methods used as well as the cultivars influence the measured volatile profiles and enantiomeric distribution of coniferous needle extracts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6274459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62744592018-12-28 Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods Jun, Yonjin Lee, Sang Mi Ju, Hyun Kyoung Lee, Hong Jin Choi, Hyung-Kyoon Jo, Gyeong Suk Kim, Young-Suk Molecules Article The enantiomeric distribution and profile of volatiles in plants, which affect the biological and organoleptic properties, can be varied depending on extraction methods as well as their cultivars. The secondary volatile components of the needles of three conifer cultivars (Chamaecyparispisifera, Chamaecyparisobtusa, and Thujaorientalis) were compared. Furthermore, the effects of three different extraction methods—solid-phase microextraction (SPME), steam distillation (SD), and solvent extraction (SE)—on the composition and enantiomeric distribution of those volatiles were elucidated. Monoterpene hydrocarbons predominated in all samples, and the compositions of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes differed according to the cultivar. In particular, the yields of oxygenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were greatest for SD, whereas those of sesquiterpenes and diterpenes were highest for SE. On the other hand, more monoterpenes with higher volatility could be obtained with SPME and SD than when using SE. In addition, the enantiomeric composition of nine chiral compounds found in three cultivars differed according to their chemotype. There were also some differences in the yielded oxygenated monoterpenes and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, but not monoterpene hydrocarbons, according to the extraction method. These results demonstrate that the extraction methods used as well as the cultivars influence the measured volatile profiles and enantiomeric distribution of coniferous needle extracts. MDPI 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6274459/ /pubmed/26999095 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21030363 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jun, Yonjin
Lee, Sang Mi
Ju, Hyun Kyoung
Lee, Hong Jin
Choi, Hyung-Kyoon
Jo, Gyeong Suk
Kim, Young-Suk
Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title_full Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title_fullStr Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title_short Comparison of the Profile and Composition of Volatiles in Coniferous Needles According to Extraction Methods
title_sort comparison of the profile and composition of volatiles in coniferous needles according to extraction methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6274459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26999095
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21030363
work_keys_str_mv AT junyonjin comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT leesangmi comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT juhyunkyoung comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT leehongjin comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT choihyungkyoon comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT jogyeongsuk comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods
AT kimyoungsuk comparisonoftheprofileandcompositionofvolatilesinconiferousneedlesaccordingtoextractionmethods