Cargando…

The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Shivani, Holloway, Lois, Roach, Dale, Pogson, Elise, Veera, Jacqueline, Batumalai, Vikneswary, Lim, Karen, Delaney, Geoff P., Lazarus, Elizabeth, Borok, Nira, Moses, Daniel, Jameson, Michael G., Vinod, Shalini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298
_version_ 1783377786824556544
author Kumar, Shivani
Holloway, Lois
Roach, Dale
Pogson, Elise
Veera, Jacqueline
Batumalai, Vikneswary
Lim, Karen
Delaney, Geoff P.
Lazarus, Elizabeth
Borok, Nira
Moses, Daniel
Jameson, Michael G.
Vinod, Shalini
author_facet Kumar, Shivani
Holloway, Lois
Roach, Dale
Pogson, Elise
Veera, Jacqueline
Batumalai, Vikneswary
Lim, Karen
Delaney, Geoff P.
Lazarus, Elizabeth
Borok, Nira
Moses, Daniel
Jameson, Michael G.
Vinod, Shalini
author_sort Kumar, Shivani
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variability in volume delineation on MRI. METHODS: Data from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre‐workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post‐workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter‐observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes. RESULTS: Post‐workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre‐workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post‐workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter‐observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4–0.8 to 0.7–0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter‐observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre‐ and post‐workshop. Post‐workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre‐workshop by 26.9%. CONCLUSION: A radiologist‐led workshop did not significantly reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6275253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62752532018-12-06 The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy Kumar, Shivani Holloway, Lois Roach, Dale Pogson, Elise Veera, Jacqueline Batumalai, Vikneswary Lim, Karen Delaney, Geoff P. Lazarus, Elizabeth Borok, Nira Moses, Daniel Jameson, Michael G. Vinod, Shalini J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variability in volume delineation on MRI. METHODS: Data from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre‐workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post‐workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter‐observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes. RESULTS: Post‐workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre‐workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post‐workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter‐observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4–0.8 to 0.7–0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter‐observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre‐ and post‐workshop. Post‐workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre‐workshop by 26.9%. CONCLUSION: A radiologist‐led workshop did not significantly reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-03 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6275253/ /pubmed/30076690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kumar, Shivani
Holloway, Lois
Roach, Dale
Pogson, Elise
Veera, Jacqueline
Batumalai, Vikneswary
Lim, Karen
Delaney, Geoff P.
Lazarus, Elizabeth
Borok, Nira
Moses, Daniel
Jameson, Michael G.
Vinod, Shalini
The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title_full The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title_fullStr The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title_short The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
title_sort impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on mri target volume delineation for radiotherapy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarshivani theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT hollowaylois theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT roachdale theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT pogsonelise theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT veerajacqueline theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT batumalaivikneswary theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT limkaren theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT delaneygeoffp theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT lazaruselizabeth theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT boroknira theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT mosesdaniel theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT jamesonmichaelg theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT vinodshalini theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT kumarshivani impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT hollowaylois impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT roachdale impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT pogsonelise impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT veerajacqueline impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT batumalaivikneswary impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT limkaren impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT delaneygeoffp impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT lazaruselizabeth impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT boroknira impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT mosesdaniel impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT jamesonmichaelg impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy
AT vinodshalini impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy