Cargando…
The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variabi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298 |
_version_ | 1783377786824556544 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Shivani Holloway, Lois Roach, Dale Pogson, Elise Veera, Jacqueline Batumalai, Vikneswary Lim, Karen Delaney, Geoff P. Lazarus, Elizabeth Borok, Nira Moses, Daniel Jameson, Michael G. Vinod, Shalini |
author_facet | Kumar, Shivani Holloway, Lois Roach, Dale Pogson, Elise Veera, Jacqueline Batumalai, Vikneswary Lim, Karen Delaney, Geoff P. Lazarus, Elizabeth Borok, Nira Moses, Daniel Jameson, Michael G. Vinod, Shalini |
author_sort | Kumar, Shivani |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variability in volume delineation on MRI. METHODS: Data from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre‐workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post‐workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter‐observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes. RESULTS: Post‐workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre‐workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post‐workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter‐observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4–0.8 to 0.7–0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter‐observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre‐ and post‐workshop. Post‐workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre‐workshop by 26.9%. CONCLUSION: A radiologist‐led workshop did not significantly reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6275253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62752532018-12-06 The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy Kumar, Shivani Holloway, Lois Roach, Dale Pogson, Elise Veera, Jacqueline Batumalai, Vikneswary Lim, Karen Delaney, Geoff P. Lazarus, Elizabeth Borok, Nira Moses, Daniel Jameson, Michael G. Vinod, Shalini J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on inter‐observer variability in volume delineation on MRI. METHODS: Data from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre‐workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post‐workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter‐observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes. RESULTS: Post‐workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre‐workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post‐workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter‐observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4–0.8 to 0.7–0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter‐observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre‐ and post‐workshop. Post‐workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre‐workshop by 26.9%. CONCLUSION: A radiologist‐led workshop did not significantly reduce inter‐observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-03 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6275253/ /pubmed/30076690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kumar, Shivani Holloway, Lois Roach, Dale Pogson, Elise Veera, Jacqueline Batumalai, Vikneswary Lim, Karen Delaney, Geoff P. Lazarus, Elizabeth Borok, Nira Moses, Daniel Jameson, Michael G. Vinod, Shalini The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title | The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title_full | The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title_short | The impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
title_sort | impact of a radiologist‐led workshop on mri target volume delineation for radiotherapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarshivani theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT hollowaylois theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT roachdale theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT pogsonelise theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT veerajacqueline theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT batumalaivikneswary theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT limkaren theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT delaneygeoffp theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT lazaruselizabeth theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT boroknira theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT mosesdaniel theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT jamesonmichaelg theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT vinodshalini theimpactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT kumarshivani impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT hollowaylois impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT roachdale impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT pogsonelise impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT veerajacqueline impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT batumalaivikneswary impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT limkaren impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT delaneygeoffp impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT lazaruselizabeth impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT boroknira impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT mosesdaniel impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT jamesonmichaelg impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy AT vinodshalini impactofaradiologistledworkshoponmritargetvolumedelineationforradiotherapy |